Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK. W.P.(C) No.7060 of 2013 An application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ---------- Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co.Ltd Petitioner Versus Golekh @ Golak Chandra Mohanty & Another Opposite Parties For Petitioner : Mr.Balakrisha Rao. For Opp. Parties : Mr.M.Sinha. (opposite party no.1) ---------- PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of hearing : 11.09.2014 Date of Judgment : 24.09.2014 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Biswanath Rath, J. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner-Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co.Ltd (Private Insurance Company) assailing the award dated 30.11.2012 under Annexure-5 passed by the opposite party no.2 in the Permanent Lok Adalat Case No.1 of 2012 in allowing the claim of the claimant on account of death of the policy holder...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK. GOVERNMENT APPEAL No.19 OF 2002 From an order dated 29.04.1998 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhadrak in S.T. Case No.23/80 of 1996. -------------------State of Orissa .... -Versus.. Sk. Himat and others Appellant Respondents For Appellant: - Mr. Sk. Zafarulla, Addl. Standing Counsel For Respondents: - Mr. M.A. Alli (For Respondents 2, 4 and5) Mr. B.K. Ragada (For Respondent no.1 & Amicus Curiae for Respondent No.3) ------------P R E S E N T :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINo.PRASAD AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of hearing-15.09.2014 : Date of Judgment-22.09.2014 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------S.K.SAHOO, J.The respondents Sk. Himat, Taslima Bibi, Noorjan Bibi, Sk. Das Mahammad and Sk. Roj Mahammad faced trial under section 498(A)/34 I.P.C. and section 302/34 I.P.C. in the court of learned Ad...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK. MATA No.43 OF 2011 In the matter of an application under Section 19 (1) of the Family Court Act, 1984 read with Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act,1958. ----------- Birendra Sahoo Appellant -VersusJyoshna Rani Sahoo For Appellant : For Respondent : Respondent M/S.MRS.Sujata Jena, G.B.Jena M/S.Niranjan Lenka, M.R.Mohapatra and P.K.Panda P R E S E N T :THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE VINo.PRASAD AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.K.SAHOO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of hearing 16.09.2014 : Date of Judgment 22.09.2014 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------S.K.SAHOO,J. This appeal has been filed by the appellant-husband under Section 19 (1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 read with Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 challenging the judgment and order dtd. 29.04.2011 of the Judge, Family Court, Bhubaneswar passed in Civil Proceedings No.239 of 2011 (MAT Case No.4...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
,ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK W.P.(Crl.) No.1684 of 2013 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. -------------Nari @ Narasingh Mohanty, S/o. Magi Mohanty, AT: Bada Sahi Huma: Ganjam ...Petitioner -VersusUnion of India & others ...Opposite Parties For petitioner : M/s. D.R.Mohapatra, A.Pasayat & D.Samantray For Opp. Parties : Mr. A.K. Bose, Asst. Solicitor General of India (For O.P.1-Union of India) Mr. M.S. Sahoo Addl. Standing Counsel (For O.Ps. 2 to 6-State) -----------P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I.MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment: 22.09.2014 B.N. Mahapatra, J.The present Writ Petition seeking issue of a writ of Habeas Corpus has been filed by the petitioner-Nari @ Narasingh Mohanty challenging the legality of the order of his detention dated 15.11.2013 passed by the District Magistrate, Ganjam under Section 3(2) of the 2 National Security Act, 1980 on the ground that such order as well...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.16739 of 2014 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. -------------- M/s Orissa Stevedores Ltd., Link Road, PO: Arunodaya Market, Madhupatna, Cuttack ...Petitioner -VersusDeputy Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax, Cuttacck and others ...Opposite Parties For petitioner : Mr.J.Sahoo, Sr. Advocate M/s. A.Mohapatra, D.Panda & B.K.Nayak For Opp. Parties : M/s M.Padhi (Sr. Standing Counsel) -----------P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I.MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. MAHAPATRA Date of Order: 22.09.2014 B.N. Mahapatra, J.This Writ Petition has been filed with a prayer to quash the notice dated 20.08.2014 (Annexure-3) issued by opposite party No.1Deputy Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax, Cuttack Division, Cuttack for recovery of Rs.11,44,54,732/- levied towards interest from the petitioner. The further prayer of the petitioner is for issuance of a 2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK. W.A. No.30 of 2014 From the order and judgment 02.12.2013 and 18.12.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.18138 of 2013. Dr. (Smt.) Geetanjali Panda . Appellant Versus Dr. Pranaya Ballari Mohanty & others . Respondents For Appellant : Mr. K.K.Swain, Advocate For Respondents : Mr.Sameer Ku. Das, Advocate (R-1) P R E S E N T: THE HONBLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONBLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.RATH Date of hearing: 10.09.2014 Date of Judgment: 19.09.2014 ____________________________________________________________________ Dr. A.K. Rath, J.The appellant has prayed, inter alia, to quash the order and judgment dated 02.12.2003 and 18.12.2013 respectively passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.18138 of 2013. By order dated 02.12.2013, the learned Single Judge dismissed the application filed by the appellant for addition of the party and eventually allowed the writ petition filed by respondent no.1 by judgment dated 18.12.2013.2. Though ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK. W.A. No.272 of 2014 From the judgment/order dated 15.07.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.21530 of 2012. Radhika Padhan . Appellant Versus Debaraj Meher . Respondent For Appellant : Mr. A.P. Bose, Advocate For Respondents : Mr.S.K. Mishra, Advocate (R-1) Addl. Government Advocate (R-2) P R E S E N T: THE HONBLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONBLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.RATH Date of hearing: 05.09.2014 Date of Judgment: 12.09.2014 ____________________________________________________________________ Dr. A.K. Rath, J.This writ appeal has been filed under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 15.7.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.21530 of 2012. By the said order, the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition and thereby confirmed the order dated 6.11.2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Patnagarh, (in short, the Election Tribunal.), in E.P No.2 of 2012 allowing the applicat...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK W.P.(C ) No.4722 of 2013 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ------------Budhiram Ho . Petitioner Versus State of Orissa and others . Opposite parties For Petitioner -- Mr.M.K.Mohanty, Advocate For Opp. Parties -- Mr.S.N.Mohapatra, Standing Counsel for S & ME. (For O.Ps. 1 to3) Mr.A.K.Biswal, Advocate (For O.P.4) PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.RATH Date of hearing: 4.9.2014 : Date of judgment: 10.9.2014 DR.A.K.RATH, J.In this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed, inter alia, for issuance of a writ of mandamus to the opposite parties to take immediate action for dismissal of opposite party no.4 from Government service as per Rule 18 read with Rule 2 13 of the Orissa Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1962.2. Bereft of unnecessary details, the short facts of the case of t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK WRIT APPEAL No.152 of 2014 This appeal arises out of the order dated 3.4.2014 passed by the Honble Single Judge in W.P(C) No.19810 of 2009. ---------Smt. Pratima Kumari Devi Appellant -versusState of Odisha and others _______________ Respondent For Appellant : M/s.Arun Kumar Acharya and S.Mishra. For Respondents : Mr. Pravat Kumar Muduli, Additional Standing Counsel (for Respondent Nos.1 to 4), M/s.Upendra Kumar Samal, C.D.Sahoo S.P.Patra and Mrs.S.Nayak (for Respondent No.5), P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE PRADIP MOHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE BISWAJIT MOHANTY Date of Judgment : 21.08.2014 Biswajit Mohanty,J.The present writ appeal has been filed by the selected candidate (appellant) with a prayer for setting aside the order dated 3.4.2014 passed by the Honble Single Judge in W.P.(C ) No.19810 of 2009. Vide order dated 3.4.2014, the Honble Single Judge quashed the order dated 7.11.2009 passed by the Sub-Collector, Athagarh (Respondent ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK C.M.P NO.213 OF 2014 (In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India) ----------------------------Narayan Chandra Sahu Petitioners -Vs- Radhashyam Maheswar and others Opp. Parties ----------------------------For Petitioners For Opp. Party No.1 : M/s. Prasanna Kumar Swain, and N.Behera : M/s B.Bhuyan, S.Patra and B.N.Mishra -----------------------------PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE KUMARI JUSTICE S.PANDA Date of Judgment : 20.08.2014 S.Panda, J.This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the order dated 31.8.2013 passed by the learned 3rd Addl. District Judge, Cuttack in T.A No.93 of 1999 allowing an application filed by the opposite party no.1 under Order 22, Rule 4 (4) of C.P.C for exemption from substituting the legal heirs of the deceased defendant no.1, who died on 19.1.2013. 2 2. The facts leading to the present case are that opposite party no.1 as plaintiff filed T.S No.284 of 1990...
Tag this Judgment!