Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK ARBA No.30 of 2004 & 33 of 2005 In the matter of an apeal under Section 37(i)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. -------------In ARBA No.30 of 2004 Durga Charan Routray Appellant -VersusSecretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Orissa & Others. Respondents For Appellant : M/s. D. Routray, G.Routray, S. Routray & D.Chatterjee For Respondents : Additional Government Advocate In ARBA No.33 of 2005 State of Orissa represented through the Secretary to Government Water Resources Department & Others. Appellants -VersusDurga Charan Routray Respondent For Appellants : Additional Government Advcoate For Respondent : M/s. D. Routray, G.Routray, S. Routray & D.Chatterjee --------------- 2 PRESENT: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE INDRAJIT MAHANTY. Date of judgment : 18.06.2014 I. Mahanty, J.Both the aforesaid appeals arise out of challenges made by the claimant as well as the State to a common judgment dated 08.09.2004 passed in Arbitration Misc. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK MISC. APPEAL NO.491 of 1993 _______________________________________________ In the matter of an application under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act. -------------Marketing Manager, The Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. and another Appellants Respondent -VersusM/s. L.M.Hati & Co. For Appellants : M/s. Ganeshwar Rath, P.K.Mohapatra, A.K.Patnaik, J.C.Sahoo & S.Mishra. For Respondent : M/s. K.N.Jena, D.K.Mohapatra, P.K.Jena & R.Rath. PRESENT: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE INDRAJIT MAHANTY Date of judgment : 18.06.2014 I. Mahanty, J.This appeal has been filed by the appellants seeking to challenge a decree dated 15.05.1993 passed by the learned SubJudge, Jagatsinghpur in T.S. No.194 of 1992 making an arbitral award rule of the court. 2 2. The impugned decree was passed in the suit whereby, the plaintiff-respondent had prayed to make an award dated 26.09.1992 passed by the sole arbitrator rule of the court with costs and interest.3. The case of the plaintiff-...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK ARBA No.30 of 2004 & 33 of 2005 In the matter of an apeal under Section 37(i)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. -------------In ARBA No.30 of 2004 Durga Charan Routray Appellant -VersusSecretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Orissa & Others. Respondents For Appellant : M/s. D. Routray, G.Routray, S. Routray & D.Chatterjee For Respondents : Additional Government Advocate In ARBA No.33 of 2005 State of Orissa represented through the Secretary to Government Water Resources Department & Others. Appellants -VersusDurga Charan Routray Respondent For Appellants : Additional Government Advcoate For Respondent : M/s. D. Routray, G.Routray, S. Routray & D.Chatterjee --------------- 2 PRESENT: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE INDRAJIT MAHANTY. Date of judgment : 18.06.2014 I. Mahanty, J.Both the aforesaid appeals arise out of challenges made by the claimant as well as the State to a common judgment dated 08.09.2004 passed in Arbitration Misc. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
W.A.No.206 of 2014 BEFORE HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.A.K.GOEL HONBLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.RATH 03. For the Appellant : Mr.D.Mishra, Advocate. For the respondent Nos.1 to 7 : Mr.R.K.Mohapatra, Govt. Advocate. 18.06.2014 ORDER (Dr. A.K.Rath, J.) Challenge is made to the orders dated 5.5.2014 and 25.3.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in RVWPET No.61 of 2014 and W.P.(C) No.18941 of 2008 respectively. BKB Respondent no.9 filed W.P.(C) No.18941 of 2008 challenging, inter alia, the selection of the appellant as Grama Rojagar Sevak of Solopata Gram Panchayat with a further prayer to direct the Collector, Nayagarh and the Project Director, District Rural Development Agency, Nayagarh to consider his candidature for the said post. It is submitted on behalf of the writ petitioner that he secured highest marks amongst the candidates. It is further submitted that no letter was sent by the authority to him for verification of the certificates. In the counter affidavit filed by the contesting oppos...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK W.P.(C) Nos.6715 of 2011, 30882 of 2011, 22838 of 2011, 27628 of 2011, 17476 of 2009, 9326 of 2009, & 15042 of 2009 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. -------------(In W.P.(C) No.6715 of 2011) Sachalabala Sethy and Ors. Petitioners Opp. Parties -VersusChief Secretary and Chief Development Commission, Orissa and others For Petitioners : Mr.Trilochan Barik For Opp. Parties : Mr. Ashok Mohanty, Advocate General (For O.P.Nos.1 to5) Mr. S.K.Padhi, Sr. Advocate M/s.M.Padhi, A.Dash, B.Panigrahi, S.B.Dash, S.S.Mohanty & H.K.Panigrahi (For O.P. No.6) (In W.P.(C) No.30882 of 2011) Budhi Bewa and Ors. -VersusCommissioner-cum-Secretary, Revenue and Disaster Management, Odisha and others Petitioners Opp. Parties For Petitioners : Mr.Trilochan Barik For Opp. Parties : Mr. Ashok Mohanty, Advocate General (For O.P.Nos.1 to3) M/s. H.K.Panigrahi, B.K.Das & N.Tripathy (For O.P. No.4) 2 Mr.J.Pattnaik, Sr. Advocate M...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK W.P.(C) Nos.2065 of 2010, 7303 of 2011, 27845 of 2011, 11738 of 2009, 15988 of 2009 & W.A. No.211 of 2012 _______________________________________________________________________ In the matter of an application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. -------------(In W.P.(C) No.2065 of 2010) Narayan Sahoo Petitioner -VersusState of Odisha and Ors. Opp. Parties For Petitioners : M/s.Sachidananda Sahoo & P.R.Bhuyan For Opp. Parties : Mr. Ashok Mohanty, Advocate General (For O.P.Nos.1 to12) : Mr.Pinaki Mishra, Sr. Advocate M/s. S.K.Padhi (Sr. Advocate), M.Padhi, A.Das, B.Panigrahi & S.B.Dash, (For opposite party Nos.13 &14) : Mr.J.Pattnaik, Sr. Advocate M/s.B.Mohanty, T.Pattnaik, S.Pattnaik, A.Pattnaik, B.S.Rayaguru (For opposite party No.16) : None (For opposite party Nos.15 &17) (In W.P.(C) No.7303 of 2011) Narendra Ku. Mohapatra & Ors. -VersusChief Secretary & Chief Development Commissioner and Ors. Petitioners Opp. Parties 2 For Pet...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK W.P.(C) Nos. 9384 of 2012, 30369 of 2011, 3926 of 2010 & W.A. No.321 of 2011 _______________________________________________________________________ In the matter of an applications under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India & Article-4 of the Orissa High Court Order, 1948. -------------(In W.P.(C) No.9384 of 2012) Charidesa Krusak Surakhya Sangha and another Petitioners Opp. Parties -VersusState of Orissa and others For Petitioners : M/s. Jayant Das, Sr. Advocate S.N.Sarkar, B.K.Jena For Opp. Parties : Mr. Ashok Mohanty, Advocate General (For O.P.Nos.1, 3, 4 and5) Mr. S.D.Das, Asst. Solicitor General (For O.P. No.2) M/s.Pinaki Mishra, Sr. Advocate Milan Kanungo, Sr. Advocate and Mr.S.Das (For O.P. No.6) (In W.P.(C) No.30369 of 2011) M/s. K.V.K. Nilachal Power Pvt. Ltd. Petitioner -VersusState of Orissa and others Opp. Parties For Petitioner : Mr.Pinaki Mishra, Sr. Advocate M/s. Milan Kanungo, Sr. Advocate and Mr.S.Das For Opp. Parties ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK. W.P.(C) No.15543 of 2013 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. Shri Diwan Chand Garg . Petitioner Versus Govt. of India represented through Secretary in Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, New Delhi & another . For Petitioner Opposite parties : Mr. M. Mohanty, Advocate For opposite parties: Mr. A. Das, Advocate (O.P. No.2) P R E S E N T: THE HONBLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. A.K. GOEL AND THE HONBLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.RATH Date of hearing:07.05.2014 Date of Judgment:14.05.2014 ________________________________________________________________________ Dr. A.K.Rath,J.By this application under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has prayed, inter alia, to quash the notification dated 18.9.2012 issued by the Land Acquisition Officer & Competent Authority, National Highway No.5 Project, Khurda, Bhubaneswar, in respect of his 2 land appertaining to Plot Nos.253, 254/1103, Khata No.166, of MouzaBomikhal, Bhuban...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK Writ Appeal No.533 of 2013 From the judgment and order dated 18.12.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.9330 of 2010. ----------Smt.Sarojini Sahoo . Appellant Versus State of Orissa and others . Respondents For the Appellant Mr.K.K.Swain, Advocate For the Respondents Mr.R.K.Mohapatra, Govt.Advocate (for R.1 to3) Mr.A.K.Mohapatra-1, Advocate (for R.4-Caveator) PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. A.K.GOEL AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.RATH Date of hearing: 30.04.2014 : Date of judgment: 14.5.2014 Dr. A.K.Rath, J.This writ appeal has been filed under Clause-10 of the Letters Patent against the judgment and order dated 18.12.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.9330 of 2010, whereby and whereunder, the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition and confirmed the order of the Sub-Collector, Sadar, Cuttack rejecting the candidature of the appellant to the post of Anganwadi Worker as she does No.belong to Adalia ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK FULL BENCH WP(C) Nos.1319 & 300 of 2013 and RVWPET No.6 of 2013 In WP(C) Nos.1319 & 300 of 2013 Sashirekha Samal . Petitioner -VersusState of Orissa & others . Opp. Parties . Petitioner In RVWPET No.6 of 2013 Smt. Reena Trivedi -VersusState of Orissa & others For the petitioner . : Opp. Parties Mr.B.Mohanty, Adv. For the Review Petitioner : Mr.P.P.Mohanty, Adv. For the State Mr.Ashok Mohanty, Adv. General & Mr.R.K.Mohapatra, Govt. Advocate : PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. A.K.GOEL AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.RATH Date of hearing : 01.05.2014 Dr.A.K.Rath, J.: Date of judgment : 14.05.2014 In this reference, we have been called upon to decide the expression total number of Councillors. appearing in Section 54(2)(a) of the Orissa Municipal Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Act.). -2- 2. against Section 54 of the Act deals with vote of no confidence Chairperson or Vice-Chairperson. The same is herei...
Tag this Judgment!