Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK. W.P.(C) NO.11267 of 2005 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ------M/s IPISTEEL Limited and another. - Petitioners Versus- Central Electricity Supply Company of Orissa Limited and another Opposite Parties For Petitioners : M/s Umesh Ch. Pattnaik, S.D. Mishra and S.Patnaik For Opp. Parties : Mr. R.K.Rath M/s. B.K.Nayak and D.K.Mohanty PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.K. PATEL Date of Judgment 19.08.2014 B.K. PATEL, J.In this writ application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioners have made prayer for the following reliefs:In the circumstances, it is therefore prayed that this Honble would graciously be pleased to examine the aforesaid facts and issue a writ of Mandamus commanding CESCO, Opposite Party No.1 to implement the Revised Rehabilitation Scheme sanctioned by BIFR vide Annexure-1 which was communicated to all the concerned parties by the Registrar, BIFR. AND...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK. W.P.(C) NO.15866 of 2007 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ------Executive Engineer,Electrical, Khurda Electrical Division, CESU,Khurda - Petitioner Versus- Ombudsman,Central Zone & another Opposite Parties For Petitioners : M/s B.K.Nayak, D.K.Mohanty and S.K.Samal. For Opp. Parties : M/s. B.Jena, S.R.Pani ( for O.P. No.2 ) PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.K. PATEL Date of Judgment 19.08.2014 B.K. PATEL, J.In this writ application petitioner, representing CESU, has made prayer to quash the award dated 5.11.2007 passed by the opposite party no.1-Ombudsman, Central Zone in Consumer Representation Case No.OM(CZ)-60 of 2007 at Annexure-12 by which order dated 22.8.2007 passed by the Grievance Redressal Forum(GRF), CESU,Khurda in Complaint Case No.31 of 2007(KED) at Annexure-8 was set aside and it was directed, inter alia, that energy bills of the opposite party no.2 for the period of seven month...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.14999 of 2014 TECHSUPPORT .. Petitioner -VersusBharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. & ors. . Opp.Parties. For the petitioner Mr. B.M.Patnaik, Sr.Advocate, For the opp.parties None PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONBLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of hearing : 12.08.2014 Date of Judgment : 19.08.2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AMITAVA ROY, C.J.Heard Mr. B.M.Pattnaik, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner.2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, we do No.consider it necessary to issue formal notice to the opposite party.3. The petitioner, a partnership firm dealing with computer and electrical devices and aspiring to participate in the process initiated by the NIT No.BBSTD/Comp-6/2014/5, dated 8.7.2014 for supply of computer software, net work technical support -2- and m...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK Writ Appeal (Civil) No.86 of 2014 In the matter of an appeal under Article 4 of the Orissa High Court Order, 1948 read with Clause 10 of the Letter Patent Constituting the High Court of Judicature at Patna. ---------Sanjukta Devi Appellant -versusState of Odisha and others For Appellant Respondents : M/s. A.R. Dash, P.K. Nayak, H.B. Dash, A.C.R. Das, B.Mohapatra, S.K.Nanda-1. For Respondents: Mr. P.K. Muduli, Addl. Standing Counsel (for Res.Nos.1 to4) M/s. Gautam Kumar Routray (for Res.No.5) PRESENT: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI Date of hearing: 13.08.2014| Date of judgment : 19.08.2014 Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.Opposite party no.6 in W.P.(C) No.20754 of 2010 has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 7.3.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in the said 2 W.P.(C) and for quashing of the order dated 19.10.2010 passed by the Sub-Collector, Cuttack, respondent no.2 in the Writ Appeal selecting resp...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK OJ.No.11403 of 2000 Bhakta Bandhu Ghadei .. Petitioner -VersusDistrict Judge, Cuttack & Anr. .. Opp.Parties. For the petitioner Mr. S.S.Das & R.C.Mishra, For the opp.parties Mr. Patnaik, Addl.Govt.Advocate PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONBLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of hearing : 13.08.2014 Date of Judgment : 19.08.2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AMITAVA ROY, C.J.The petitioner, who was appointed as Lower Division Clerk in the office of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jajpur under the judgeship of Cuttack has put to challenge his removal from service by way of disciplinary measure.2. We have heard Mr. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner and also Mr. Patnaik, learned counsel for the opposite party.3. The skeletal facts are that the petitioner, while was serving i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK Writ Appeal (Civil) No.36 of 2013 In the matter of an appeal under Article 4 of the Orissa High Court Order, 1948 read with Clause 10 of the Letter Patent Constituting the High Court of Judicature at Patna. ---------Urmila Das Appellant -versusState of Odisha and others For appellant : For respondents : Respondents M/s. Sujata Jena, G.B. Jena and P. Dash M/s. P.K. Das, H.B. Dash and, A.C.B. Das (For Opp. No.6) PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI Date of hearing: 13.08.2014| Date of judgment : 19.08.2014 Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.This appeal challenges the order of the learned Single Judge dated 7.1.2013 in W.P.(C) No.22553 of 2011.2. The factual backdrop is that an advertisement bearing notification No.225 dated 19.02.2009 was floated by the C.D.P.O., Mahanga, respondent no.5, vide Annexure-1 inviting applications for filling up of a post of Anganwadi Worker which related to Hansadia Mundasahi Addit...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK W.P.(C) Nos. 15174, 15175, 15176, 15178 & 15181 of 2014 Aapplications under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. W.P.(C) No.15174/2014 M/s. Yazdani International Pvt.Ltd. & Anr. .. Petitioners -VersusState of Odisha & two others. .. Opp.Parties. W.P.(C) No.15175/2014 M/s. Aliza International Pvt.Ltd. & Anr. .. Petitioners -VersusState of Odisha & two others. .. Opp.Parties. W.P.(C) No.15176/2014 M/s. K.K. Resources Pvt.Ltd. & Anr. .. Petitioners -VersusState of Odisha & two others. .. Opp.Parties. W.P.(C) No.15178/2014 Sri Lakshmi Constructios Pvt.Ltd. & Anr. .. Petitioners -VersusParadip Port Trust & Anr. .. Opp.Parties. W.P.(C) No.15181/2014 M/s. Royalline Resources Ltd. & Anr. .. Petitioners -VersusState of Odisha & two others. .. Opp.Parties. Advocates: For the petitioners For the opp.parties Mr. Jagannath Patnaik, Sr. Adv. M/s. P.K. Dash & A. Patnaik. . None. -2- PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONBL...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK CONTC No.1808 of 2010 An application U/s. 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act arising out of OJ.No.4964 of 1996 disposed of on 15.7.2008. Grantha Pasayat .. Petitioner -VersusRajendra Prasad Gupta, Chief General Manager, MCL. . Opp.Party. For the petitioner M/s. Dayananda Mohapatra, M. Mohapatra, G. Mohapatra, S.P. Nath & L. Nanda. For the opp.party Mr. Naresh Chandra Sahoo. PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONBLE DR JUSTICE B. R. SARANGI ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of hearing : 12.08.2014 Date of Judgment : 19.08.2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------AMITAVA ROY, C.J.The petitioner alleges herein deliberate non-compliance of the judgment and order dated 15.07.2008 passed in O.J.C. No.4964 of 1996 (since modified by orders dated 29.1.2010 and 29.6.2010 in Misc. Case Nos. 534 of 2009 and 238 of 2010 respectively).2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK WRIT APPEAL (CIVIL) No.287 OF 2010 In the matter of an appeal under Article 4 of the Orissa High Court Order, 1948 read with Clause 10 of the Letter Patent Constituting the High Court of Judicature at Patna. ------------------Padmabati Naik and others Appellants Respondents - versus Goudagaon Primary School and others For Appellants: M/s. Banmali Sahoo, N. Lenka, A. Parida, S.K. Mohapatra For Respondents: M/s. S.P. Mishra, S. Nanda, S. Mohanty, B.S. Panigrahi, A.K. Das PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI Date of hearing: 12.08.2014 Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.: Date of Judgment: 19.08.2014 Opposite parties 4 to 8 in W.P.(C) No.1248 of 2009 are the appellants in this Writ Appeal challenging the order dated 14.09.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge in the said W.P.(C).2. by W.P.(C) No.1248 of 2009 was filed before this Court the present respondent no.1, Gaudagaon Primary School challenging the order...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.26314 of 2013 An application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India (in the nature of a PIL). Akhila Kumar Jena .. Petitioner -VersusCommissioner-cum-Chairman, State Transport Authority, Odisha, Cuttack & others .. Opp.Parties. For the petitioner M/s. Biraja Pr. Das, A. Ekka, & J.S. Maharana. For the opp.parties Mr. J.Pal, Standing Counsel (for O.P. No.1). Mr. Amiya Ku. Mohanty, Advocate (for O.P. No.2) Mr. B.K. Nayak, Addl.Govt.Advocate (for O.P. Nos.3,5 &6) Mr. Prasanta Ku. Nayak, Advocate (for O.P. No.7). PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AMITAVA ROY AND THE HONBLE DR JUSTICE B. R. SARANGI ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of hearing : 12.08.2014 Date of Judgment : 19.08.2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------AMITAVA ROY, C.J.Heard Mr. B.P. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. J.Pal, learned Standing Counsel ...
Tag this Judgment!