Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 15.02.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum) in Complaint Case No.190/2010, whereby the complaint filed by the appellant/ complainant, has been partly allowed and respondent/O.P./ Insurance Company, has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.5,43,750/- to the appellant /complainant within a month from the date of order, along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 16.04.2010 till date of payment. The District Forum has further directed the respondent/O.P./Insurance Company to pay Rs.10,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.3,000/- as cost of litigation to the appellant/complainant. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the appellant/complainant before the District Forum are : that the appellant/complainant is registered owner of the vehicle bearing registration No.C.G.04-ZA-6938. The said vehicle was i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 22.12.2012, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum) in Complaint Case No.141/2012. By the impugned order, the complaint of the appellant/complainant, has been dismissed by the District Forum. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the appellant/complainant are : that the respondents/OPs are Directors of Wiro Research and Care Clinic. On 24.01.2011, Smt. Khemlata Sahu, who was wife of the appellant/complainant fell ill and she had taken to the hospital of the respondents/OPs. The appellant / complainant had taken Smt. Khemlata Sahu, on pursuance of advertisement published in daily newspaper. The respondents/OPs registered Smt. Khemlata Sahu, in their hospital and her registration No. was 068/11 and she was advised for blood test. The blood test was conducted in the hospital of the respondents/OPs. In the blood test report, it is mentioned that H...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 07.05.2013 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Mahasamund (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum") in Complaint Case No.09/2013. By the impugned order, the complaint of the respondent/complainant, has been partly allowed by the District Forum and directed the respondents/OPs to pay a sum of Rs.1,54,000/- to the respondent/complainant along with interest @ 6% from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 07.05.2011 till date of payment, within a period of one month from the date of order. The District Forum, has further directed to pay Rs.5,000/- towards compensation for mental agony and Rs.3,000/- as cost of litigation. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the respondent/complainant before the District Forum are : that the shop of the respondent/complainant namely Jain Cosmetics, was insured by the appellant No.3 through appellant No.2 under Policy No.215034 / 48 /10 000030 for the period from...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 15.05.2013 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum") in Complaint Case No.CC/12/366. By the impugned order, the complaint filed by the appellant/complainant, has been dismissed by the District Forum. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the appellant/complainant before the District Forum are that : on 23/11/1991, the appellant/complainant deposited a sum of Rs.6,812/- in the respondent/Bank in the name of his minor son Naman Bhatt under Laxmivarsha Jama Yojna. At that time respondent/Bank told the appellant/complainant that rate of interest is 13% p.a. and on the date of maturity i.e. 23.11.1994 the amount payable was Rs.9,999/-. On being asked by the respondent/Bank, that again rate of interest was 13% p.a. the appellant/complainant reinvested the amount for six years. The first maturity amount was Rs. 21,544/- and thereafter reinvestment of the above amount, the ma...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This order will govern disposal of Appeal No .FA/13/263 as well as Appeal No. FA/13/266, which have been preferred respectively by the O.P.No.1 and 3 / Punjab National Bank and O.P.No.2 / Axis Bank of the Complaint Case No.29/2011 against the order dated 07.03.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum? for short), whereby the complaint filed by the complainants, has been allowed in part, and directed the O.P. No.1 and O.P.No.2 to pay a sum of Rs.1,000/- to the complainants, along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 27.10.2010 till date of payment, within a period of one month and also pay Rs.100/- per day as per Circular towards compensation from 07.11.2010 till date of payment as well as Rs.2,000/- as cost of litigation to the complainants. For the purpose of convenience, hereinafter in this order, the parties will be referred as per their original nomenclatur...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 11.10.2012, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth District Forum") in Complaint Case No.C.C.12/20. By the impugned judgment, the learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint and directed the OPs to pay a sum of Rs.1,12,904/- within a month from the date of order, along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 24.01.2012 till date of payment to the complainant. It has further been directed to the O.P. to pay Rs.5,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.2,000/- as cost of litigation to the complainant. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint filed by the complainant before the District Forum are : that the complainant Rajendra Kumar Mishra purchased a second hand Maruti 800 Car, bearing registration Number C.G.04-B-7358 with the help of financial assistance provided by the OPs and loan of Rs.1,24,000/-, was sanctioned. The s...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 21.05.2012, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum) in Complaint Case No.415/2010, whereby the complaint filed by the appellant/ complainant, has been dismissed. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the complaint of the appellant/complainant before the District Forum are : that the appellant/complainant is owner of Stone Crusher and he obtained Low Tension Electric Connection with Service No.470002/1000467748 from the respondents. On 01.09.2010 respondent No.3 sent a letter No.1055/2008-09 dated 06.08.2010 along with four additional bills amounting to Rs.480/-, Rs.12,894/-, Rs.11,042/- and Rs.5,799/- respectively to the appellant/complainant. The appellant/complainant on 03.09.2010 sent a letter of objection to the respondent no.3 and demanded calculation sheet and audit report and basis of the issuance of above bills. Respondent no.3 sent letter dated 08.09...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 19.03.2013 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Surguja, Ambikapur (henceforth called "District Forum"), in complaint case no.31/2007. By the impugned order, learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent no.1/ complainant against appellant/O.P.No.1 and directed the appellant/O.P.No.1 to pay a sum of Rs.2,75,700/- within a month from the date of order to the respondent No.1/complainant along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 09.03.2007 and also to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- towards compensation for physical and mental agony and inconvenience suffered by him and Rs.2,000/- as cost of litigation. 2. Brief facts of the complaint of the respondent no.1/complainant before the District Forum are : that the respondent No.1/complainant is registered owner of tractor bearing registration No.M.P.27-B/1378 and trolley bearing registration No.M.P....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 19.12.2012, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum) in Complaint Case No.99/2012, whereby the complaint filed by the respondent / appellant, has been allowed and appellant/O.P. / Insurance Company, has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.40,538/- to the respondent/complainant within a month from the date of order along with interest @ 09% p.a. The District Forum has further directed the appellant/O.P./Insurance Company to pay Rs.1,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation to the respondent/complainant. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the complaint filed by the respondent/complainant before the District Forum are : that the vehicle bearing registration No.C.G.11-C.F.2798 was of the registered ownership of the respondent/complainant, Lekhan Chand Sahu, which was insured by the appellant/O.P/Insurance Company under policy No...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 12.03.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum"), in Complaint Case No.58/2012. By the impugned order, the learned District Forum, has allowed the complaint of the respondent / complainant and directed the appellant/O.P./Insurance Corporation to pay a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- to the respondent/complainant along with interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of order till date of payment, within a period of one month. The District Forum has further directed the appellant/O.P./Insurance Corporation to pay a sum of Rs.4,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation to the respondent/complainant. 2. The facts of the complaint of the respondent/ complainant before the District Forum are : that Late Kushdhwaj Nayak, who was husband of the respondent/complainant, had obtained an insurance policy from the appellant/O.P./Insurance Corporat...
Tag this Judgment!