Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal has been filed being aggrieved by the order dated 29.08.2012 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bilaspur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum"), in Complaint Case No.218/2009 "Smt. Smt. Seti Magrani Vs. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Through Divisional Manager and another". By the impugned order, the District Forum, allowed the complaint of the respondent No.1/complainant and directed the appellant/O.P.No.1 to pay sum of Rs.5,00,000/- to the respondent No.1/complainant along with interest @ 7% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint and also awarded Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation and to pay the same within two months from the date of order, otherwise, the aforesaid amount will be payable along with interest @ 9% p.a. 2. The facts of the complaint filed by the respondent No.1/complainant before the District Forum : are that the respondent No.1/complainant Smt. Seti Magrani is wife of Late Jang Bahadur Thapa, who wa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 28.07.2012, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum") in Complaint Case No.54/2011, whereby the complaint, has been allowed by the District Forum and the learned District Forum, has directed the appellant/O.P. (i) to send electricity bill for the month of November, 2010 and January, 2011 on the basis of correct consumption, to which the respondents/complainants are responsible to pay (ii) the connection which was disconnected was to be reinstated/connected immediately after making payment by the respondents/complainants (iii) to pay a sum of Rs.4,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation to the respondents/complainants. 2. The facts of the complaint filed by the respondents/complainants before the District Forum, are : that the respondents/complainants obtained one domestic electric connection in their house from the a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. The complainant Shamsher Singh, has filed this complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 seeking compensation of Rs.70,00,000/- for decrease in production on account of sale of adulterated and sub standard quality of white potash, Rs.12,00,550/- for loss suffered in Drip System, Rs.4,00,000/- towards compensation for mental agony along with interest @ 9% p.a. i.e. Rs.11,07,074/- totaling Rs.97,07,624/-. 2. The complaint of the complainant in brief is that : the complainant is an educated farmer. Agriculture is only source of his livelihood. The complainant is carrying agriculture activities with the help of his brother Jitendra Singh and other family members. The complainant has obtained 45 acres agricultural land on rent from Chawla Krishi Farm, Mandir Hasaud (Riko Road) and is carrying agriculture activities. O.P.No.1 is a company registered under Indian Companies Act, 1956 and it is manufacturer of white potash fertilizer, O.P.No.2 is...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 21.10.2013, passed District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum?) in Complaint Case No.213/2012. By the impugned order the learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent/complainant and directed the appellant/O.P./Insurance Company to pay within a month a sum of , Rs.52,500/- to the respondent/complainant, along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 25.06.2012 till date of payment. The District Forum has further directed the appellant/O.P./Insurance Company to pay a sum of Rs.2,000/- towards compensation for mental agony and Rs.2,000/- towards Advocate Fees and cost of litigation to the respondent /complainant. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the respondent/complainant before the District Forum are : that the respondent/complainant is owner of vehicle Hero Honda Hunk bearing registration No.C.G.0...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 30.04.2013, passed District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum?) in Complaint Case No.49/2009. By the impugned order the learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent/complainant and directed the appellant/O.P. to pay within a month a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- to the respondent/complainant, along with interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 14.11.2008 till date of payment. The District Forum has further directed the appellant/O.P. to pay a sum of Rs.25,000/-, which is the amount of lucky draw as well as Rs.30,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.2,000/- as advocate fees and cost of litigation to the respondent/complainant. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the respondent/complainant before the District Forum are : that the respondent/complainant had booked a Farm House in Saloni Farm House Scheme of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 14.01.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum") in Complaint Case No.133/2012, whereby the complaint of the respondent / complainant, has been allowed. 2. The appellants/OPs have preferred this appeal against the impugned order dated 14.01.2013, passed by the District Forum and have also filed application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 3. Shri Dron Tamrakar, learned counsel appearing for the appellants/OPs prayed for condoning the delay in filing the appeal on the basis of grounds mentioned in the application for condonation of delay filed by the appellants/OPs and he seeks an opportunity to argue the matter on merits. He placed reliance on N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy, AIR 1998 Supreme Court 3222; E.I.C.M. Exports Ltd. v. South Indian Corpn. (Agencies) Ltd. and Another [2011] 7 RCR (Civ) 32/[2009] 14 SCC 412 / [2009]...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 17.07.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Surguja, Ambikapur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum"), in Complaint Case No.170/2012. By the impugned order, the learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent No.1/complainant and directed the appellants/O.P.Nos.1 and 2 to pay sum of Rs.5,00,000/- which is sum insured under Group Janta Personal Accident Policy to the respondent No.1 / complainant, along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 26.11.2012. The District Forum, has further directed the appellants/O.P.Nos.1 and 2 to pay a sum of Rs.3,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.1,000/- as Advocate Fees to the respondent No.1/complainant. 2. The facts of the complaint filed by the respondent No.1/complainant before the District Forum are that : the husband of the respondent No.1/complainant namely Kailash Sharma, was a pe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 20.08.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum?) in Complaint Case No.CC/27/2012, whereby the complaint filed by the respondent No.1/complainant, has been partly allowed and the District Forum has directed the O.P. Nos.1, 3 and 4 to pay jointly and severally a sum of Rs.8,300/- to the respondent No.1/complainant within a period of 30 days from the date of order, along with interest @ 7.5% p.a. and to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- towards compensation for mental agony and Rs.5,000/- towards advocate fees and cost of litigation. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case, as per pleadings of the complainant are: that the respondent No.1/ complainant is an agriculturist by profession and is earning his livelihood by agricultural operation in his fields. The O.P.No.1, is the manufacturer of standard seeds, O.P.No.2 is an unit of certifying the sta...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 18.10.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum"), in Complaint Case No.199/2012. By the impugned order, the learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent Nos.1 and 2 / complainants and directed the OPs to pay a sum of Rs.3,50,000/- jointly and severally to the respondent Nos.1 and 2/ complainants as compensation, along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 12.06.2012 till date of payment. The District Forum, has further directed the OPs to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.2,000/- as Advocate Fees and cost of litigation to the complainants. 2. Brief facts of the case, as stated in the complaint filed by the respondent Nos.1 and 2/complainants before the District Forum are : that the respondent Nos.1 and 2 / complainants had taken a LPG gas connection for the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 02.05.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum") in Complaint Case No.CC/12/273. By the impugned order, the complaint filed by the respondent/complainant has been allowed and the appellants/Insurance Corporation, has been directed to pay within period of two months from the date of order the amount payable as accidental benefit under policy Nos.370473369, 384067139 and 385316764 and also pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- as compensation for mental agony along with interest @ 06% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 10/09/2012 and also pay a sum of Rs.2,000/-. If the aforesaid amount is not paid within the stipulated period, then the aforesaid amount would be payable along with interest 09% p.a. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the respondent/complainant before the District Forum are : that the during his life time, the husband of the ...
Tag this Judgment!