Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal has been filed being aggrieved by the order dated 15.02.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Janjgir (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum"), in CC No.2012/12 "Brijnandgan Chandra Vs. Branch Manager, Jain Tractors". By the impugned order, the learned District Forum, has dismissed the complaint of the appellant/complainant. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the complaint filed by the appellant/ complainant before the District Forum are: that the appellant/complainant purchased Mahindra Bhumi Putra Tractor from the respondent/O.P. and deposited a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- as margin money on 25.06.2011. When after purchasing the tractor, the appellant/complainant plied the tractor for 2-3 hours, then the engine of the tractor became heated. The appellant/complainant contacted the respondent/O.P. and made complaint regarding the above defect in the tractor, then the respondent/O.P. sent his mechanic for removing the defects. On being given...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 26.12.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bilaspur (C.G.) (henceforth District Forum") in Complaint Case No.186/2009. By the impugned order, the learned District Forum, has dismissed the complaint filed by the appellant/complainant holding that the appellant/complainant does not come in the category of "consumer" as defined in Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the appellant /complainant before the District Forum are : that the appellant/complainant purchased a second hand JCB vehicle bearing registration No.W.B.26-C-4225 at the price of Rs.4,00,000/- with the help of respondent No.1/O.P.No.1 and the installments of the loan were being deposited by him with the respondent No.2/O.P.No.2, who is branch office of the respondent No.1/O.P.No.1. The appellant/complainant was to pay a sum of Rs.4,58,850/- against the amount of loan,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 07.01.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum") in Complaint Case No.107/2010 whereby the complaint of the respondent No.1 (complainant), has been allowed. 2. The appellant (O.P. No.3) has preferred this appeal against the impugned order dated 07.01.2013, passed by the District Forum and also filed an application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 3. We have heard learned counsel for both the parties on the application for condonation of delay and have also perused the record of the District Forum. 4. In Revision Petition No.1616 of 2011 - National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shri P. Rangaswamy and anr., decided on 11.11.2013, Hon'ble National Commission held thus : "8. In Ram Lal and others Vs. Rewa Coalfields Ltd., AIR 1962 Supreme Court 361, it has been observed :- It is, however, necessary to emphasize that even after suffici...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 18.11.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Mahasamund (C.G.), in Complaint Case No.04/2013. By the impugned order, learned District Forum has dismissed the complaint of the appellants (complainants). 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the appellants (complainant), before the District Forum are : that deceased Sakharam Sahu was husband of the appellant No.1 (complainant No.1) Smt. Triveni Bai and father of appellant Nos.2 to 4 (complainant Nos.2 to 4). Deceased Sakharam Sahu had purchased Group Janta Personal Accident Policy No.100300/47/01/9600022/01/96/30180 for the period from 01.09.2002 to 31.08.2017 from the respondent No.2 (O.P.No.2) National Insurance Company Limited and the insured amount is Rs.1,00,000/-. The appellant No.1 (complainant No.1) Smt. Triveni Bai was made nominee in the policy. On 28.05.2012, deceased Sakharam Sahu, was threatened by Yograj Sahu for payment o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 12.08.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg (C.G.) (henceforth District Forum") in Complaint Case No.343/2012. By the impugned order, the learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent no.1 (complainant) and directed the appellant (O.P.No.1) to pay a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- as compensation to the respondent No.1 (complainant) along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint till date of payment. The District Forum has further directed the appellant (O.P.) to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- as compensation for mental agony and unfair trade practice and Rs.2,000/- as advocate fees and cost of litigation. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the respondent no.1 (complainant) before the District Forum are : that the respondent No.2 (O.P. No.2 Bank) had obtained Personal Accident Insurance Policy No.192502/48/2011/278 from the appellant (O.P.N...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 30.04.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth District Forum") in Complaint Case No.122/2010. By the impugned order, learned District Forum, dismissed the complaint filed by the appellant (complainant). Hence this appeal. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the appellant (complainant) before the District Forum are : that the appellant (complainant) obtained finance facility of Rs.3,19,000/- from previous financer Shrachi Security Ltd. Jabalpur for purchase of a pick-up vehicle for the business purpose on 31.01.2005 and the rate of interest payable was 4% p.a. The subordinate office of the financier Shrachi Infrastructure Limited modified the interest rate 7.5% p.a. and dispute arose between the parties, but when the appellant (complainant) had not paid the installments, the agent made compromise and fixed rate of interest as 4.5% p.a. According to this compr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 10.09.2012, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (C.G.) (henceforth District Forum") in Complaint Case No.59/2011. By the impugned order, the learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent (complainant) and directed the appellants (OPs) to pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-, which is repairing charges of the vehicle in question, to the respondent (complainant) within a month along with interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of the order till date of payment. The District Forum has further directed the appellants (OPs) to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.2,000/- as cost of the litigation to the respondent (complainant). 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint filed before the District Forum are : that the respondent (complainant) is the registered owner of the vehicle bearing registration No.C.G.04-JB-5443. The said vehicle was insured with a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 26.04.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G) (henceforth œDistrict Forum?) in Complaint Case No.28/2012. By the impugned, the learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent (complainant) and directed the appellant (O.P.) to pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-, which is the amount of cheque along, with interest @ 6% from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 01.02.2012 till the date of payment. The District Forum has further directed to the appellant/O.P. to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.3,000/- towards cost of litigation. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint filed by the respondent/complainant before the District Forum are : that the respondent/complainant and her husband namely Tulsi Patel having a joint saving bank account No.1261355823 in the appellant (O.P.) Central Bank of India, Branch Fafadih, Raipur....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 12.12.2012 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum?) in Complaint Case No.138/2012. By the impugned, the learned District Forum, has dismissed the complaint filed by the appellant/complainant. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the complaint filed before the District Forum are : that the appellant/complainant is owner of 2.241 hectare of land, near about 22.983 hectare land is recorded in the name of his father Gore Singh and near about 5.515 hectare of land is recorded in the name of his brother Venkat Singh and Lala Singh. All the land are situated at village Kenwtara, Patwari Halka No.12, Revenue Circle Saja, Tehsil and District Bemetara (C.G.). The respondent No.3/O.P.No.3 Deputy director Agriculture advised the appellant / complainant to cultivate soyabean crop instead of paddy crop. On being advised by the respondent No.3/O.P.No.3, the appellant/complainant ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 23.04.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (C.G.) (henceforth District Forum") in Complaint Case No.30/2013. By the impugned order, the learned District Forum, has dismissed the complaint filed by the appellant (complainant). 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint filed before the District Forum are : that the appellant (complainant) is registered owner of vehicle bearing registration No.C.G. 13 “ L-1052, chassis no. M.A.T. 445056 B.V.G. 64025, Engine No. 2751D 106 G.Y.Y.S.D. 6148. The said vehicle was insured with the respondent (O.P.) for the period from 05.10.2011 to 04.10.2012 and the insurance policy No. is 193300 / 31/2012/7081. During the subsistence of insurance policy, the said vehicle was dashed by a motor cycle at Village Domhani, near Main Road, Bilaigarh, District Balodabazar in which the vehicle in question was damaged extensively. The appellant (complainant)...
Tag this Judgment!