Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Year: 1963 Page 1 of about 301 results (2.168 seconds)A.J. Patel and ors. Vs. the State of Gujarat and ors.
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Apr-18-1963
Reported in : AIR1965Guj234a
..... of power on he parliament under clause 1 of article 4 to amend the constitution by making supplemental incidental and consequential provisions the power to make supplemental incidental and consequential provisions can therefore ..... 1959 the deputy secretary to the government of india had addressed letters to various state governments laying down the procedure in connection with the publication of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnantmal and ors. Vs. Lala and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Aug-08-1963
Reported in : AIR1964Raj88
the trial however the provisions of section 90 of the indian evidence act were not invoked by the plaintiffs in proof of general application and rest on principle as well as authority and its provisions are in my opinion binding on us the transfer of property act that section 111 g as amended in 1929 embodies a principle of justice equity and good to cases not governed by the transfer of propertyact accepting therefore the contention of the learnedcounsel that principles underlying section 116
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKaruppiah Ambalam Vs. Ayya Nadar
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Oct-17-1963
Reported in : AIR1965Mad435; (1965)1MLJ75
jurisdiction of such transferee court s 39 1 d gives power to the court which passed the decree to transfer the will briefly refer to the relevant provisions of the civil procedure code which deal with this matter under s 39 c held to include the power to transfer execution proceedings 8 therefore we overrule the objections of the petitioner and dismiss this
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBurn and Company Ltd. Vs. Its Workmen
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Dec-06-1963
Reported in : [1964(8)FLR138]; (1964)ILLJ370SC; [1964]5SCR823
tribunal apparently relied on an observation of this court in indian hume pipe co ltd v their workmen 1959 su 2 applicable in comparison to section 360 cr p c the scope of section 4 of the probation of offenders act is the probation of offenders act and the code of criminal procedure wanted to obviate the provisions of the probation of offenders found as allowable 4 mr sen s main attempt has therefore been to persuade us to reject the tribunal s conclusion
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State Vs. Bhimrao and anr.
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-04-1963
Reported in : AIR1963Mys239; 1963CriLJ293; (1963)1MysLJ148
attracted that is precisely what the courts below have held indian evidence act 1872 c a no 1 1872 section 90 declaration that an adoption is invalid in such a case article 57 would apply further article 57 pre supposes the plaintiff judge bidar tinder section 438 of the code of criminal procedure recommending that the order passed by the munsiff magistrate in on 17 11 1961 is bad in law and has therefore to be set aside the reference is accordingly allowed the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamchandra Dhondu Dalvi Vs. Vithaldas Gokuldas
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Nov-15-1963
Reported in : AIR1964Bom251; (1964)66BOMLR277; 1964MhLJ397
judge as late as 20th november 1951 it was incumbent union the defendant to have given all particulars of his mother there is nothing in the rule itself which limits the power of the court to set aside the decree only if which it otherwise has under section 148 of the civil procedure code if an application were made before the expiry of its revisional jurisdiction and that too in exceptional casds if therefore a case arises where conditional leave is granted and the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGovindagouda Narayanagouda Vs. Madhava Rao Narasinga Rao
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Nov-08-1963
Reported in : AIR1964Kant277; AIR1964Mys277; ILR1964KAR125; (1964)1MysLJ243
the decision of the madras high court in vythilinga v board of control thiagarajaswami devasthanam reported in air 1932 mad 193 para 7 of the compromise it is stated that as power of attorney holder he has incurred the entire expenses in as defined in sub section 3 of section 2 civil procedure code 3 i respectfully agree with the above observations that determination of this point is not necessary in this case therefore i have not considered that point 11 on the aforesaid
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Singhara Singh and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-16-1963
Reported in : AIR1964SC358; [1964]4SCR485
singhara singh of the murder under s 302 of the indian penal code and sentenced him to death he convicted the seems to us to be without foundation quite clearly the power conferred by s 164 to record a statement or confession a witness under s 164 of the code of criminal procedure could be used against the accused substantive evidence of the applied to judicial officers making records under s 164 and therefore held that magistrate could not give oral evidence of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHans George Vs. State
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Dec-10-1963
Reported in : AIR1964Bom274; (1964)66BOMLR262; 1964CriLJ650; ILR1964Bom319; 1964MhLJ441
offence a clear statement of the mental condition necessary to constitute the offence that if in any case the legislature has a person to bring or send gold or silver into india subject to the two obligations mentioned therein if the notification at least in so far as some of the permitted articles are concerned an integral part of crimes generally has been v leslie gwilt 47 bom lr 431 air 1945 bom 368 emperor v raghunath krishna 48 bom lr 758 air 1947 brought or sent into india 9 acting in pursuance of powers conferred by sub section 1 of section 8 the central the law or as in the case of acts of parliament knowledge may be presumed but in the case of a 62 48 r 8 dated the 25th august 1943 as amended from time to time the reserve bark of india hereby should not be found guilty of an offence against the criminal law unless he had a guilty mind or to use transhipment have been complied with by the appellant we must therefore hold that appellant has not committed a breach of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Jaipur Udyog Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Nov-21-1963
Reported in : AIR1965Raj162
said agreement devolved by virtue of article 295 of the constitution on the union of india thus it is averred that has also been urged on behalf of the union of india that annexure a does not contain any guarantee from exemption obligation devolved on the union of india by virtue of article 295 of the constitution such obligation could be abrogated or 3 we first of all deal with writ application no 368 of 1961 the petitioner s case is that the government action to pass assessment orders was ultra vires of his powers 8 mr lodha appearing on behalf of the union of such obligation could be abrogated or wiped out by the parliament by enacting a law according to his contention extension of operation of that law income tax act is an exhaustive code that deals with all aspects of the questions of levy erstwhile jaipur state was desirous of industrialising the state and therefore it had made an approach to the petitioner company for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT