Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Year: 1973 Page 1 of about 302 results (0.88 seconds)Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and ors.Vs. State of Kerala and anr ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-24-1973
Reported in : AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1
..... old the marginal heading of the unamended article 368 was procedure for amendment of the constitution the new heading is power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor section 3 b of the amending act inserts a new sub section 1 in article 368 notwithstanding anything in this constitution parliament may in exercise of its constituent power amend by way of addition variation or .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKalyan Bhadra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Nov-19-1973
Reported in : AIR1975Cal72
..... india for that particular year article 113 lays down procedure that a parliament adopts in regard to such estimates article ..... power of legislation under article 123 of the constitution of india ..... 1 government of india act and therefore whether circumstances ..... sections 365 366 367 368 372 and 385 ..... amendment ordinance of 1948 under special powers under sub section 1 of section 88 of government of india .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMahadeo Amrut Gajbhiye Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Nov-09-1973
Reported in : 1974CriLJ1075; 1974MhLJ164
is not contemplated by the code and there is no power in the code to forfeit such a bond the learned learned chief justice had observed as it appears from criminal procedure code schedule v form no xiii there should be two could not be enforced and the order of forfeiture must therefore be quashed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Mysore and ors. Vs. H.D. Kolkar
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-10-1973
Reported in : AIR1974SC19; 1974LabIC130; (1974)ILLJ87SC; (1974)3SCC486; [1974]1SCR858; 1973(5)LC839(SC)
and to enhance punishment imposed beyond its competence appeal dismissed indian penal code 1860 c a no 45 1860 section 379 by government decision which comes into being after exercise of power not subject to supervision of government by framing a rule the probation of offenders act and the code of criminal procedure wanted to obviate the provisions of the probation of offenders government had no jurisdiction to enhance the punishment the court therefore quashed the order of the government enhancing the punishment it
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChandrika Misir and anr. Vs. Bhaiya Lal
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jul-31-1973
Reported in : AIR1973SC2391; (1973)2SCC474; [1974]1SCR290
suit did not help him because section 6 of the indian limitation act 1908 did not govern suits falling under u which entertained the suit suffered from an inherent lack of jurisdiction the present appeal filed by the plaintiffs will have to of schedule ii shall notwithstanding anything contained in the civil procedure code 1908 take cognizance of any suit application or proceedings possession of the land contrary to law being a trespasser therefore the suit was of a description falling under section 209
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHashim HusaIn and ors. Vs. Ahmad Raza and ors.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Aug-23-1973
Reported in : AIR1974All305
act or as understood either gene rally or under the indian trusts act but the nature of the duties which he according to his submission the tribunal erred in finding that article 120 of the limitation act applied to the facts of as mutwallis this resolution was passed in exercise of the power under section 48 of the act on the assumption that the latter any appointment will be ineffective 25 we are therefore not prepared to hold that the power under the mohemmedan
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKrishna Wanti Puri Vs. the Life Insurance Corporation of India, Divisi ...
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-03-1973
Reported in : AIR1975Delhi19
contains a term to the effect that the proposal form constitutes the basis of the contract the insurers are entitled to freedom of the insurers has been severely restricted by the indian legislature the insured has thus been sufficiently protected and the upon the wife to return the minor child to the jurisdiction of the said court a further direction was given for contract of insurance contracts of insurance are uberrima fides and thereforee the insured owes a duty to disclose before the contract
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. S.R. Doiphode
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jun-25-1973
Reported in : (1974)76BOMLR334
circumstances of each case the decision was based on the constitution of the indian naval canteen service produced before the court court on the aforesaid siri chand suri v union of india were concerned with the question as to whether the canteen to purchase any one article or any number of similar articles purchased at one time b write off of losses of act 1947 but the court itself has observed at page 368 that the question is a question of fact depending on securities powers the board of administration will exercise the following powers the powers can be exercised by the chairman of the capital it is also stated that public accounts committee of parliament in its seventeenth report in 1955 56 and in its 1965 66 the order is challenged in the said special civil application by the union of india which was not a well as bodies corporate established under any law it cannot therefore be said that when item 6 g in the second
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. K.C. Behera and ors.
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Sep-13-1973
Reported in : [1976]103ITR479(Orissa)
19 the matter is concluded by the judgment of the constitution bench in jain brothers v union of india 1970 77itr107 concealment of income 12 section 28 1 c of the indian income tax act 1922 act xi of 1922 hereinafter to is on that basis that the question of discrimination under article 14 was examined an answer could not be given by was satisfied that the amount constituted concealed income 4 75 368 on the same day the income tax officer issued a authority that the date of the satisfaction of the appropriate authority is the date for initiation of the proceeding under section 271 1 c of the new act prior to its amendment had application in construing the ambit and scope of that effect from april 1 1964 involved amendment of substantive and procedural law together and consequently had no retrospective effect in the deposit of statutory amount as embodies in the first proviso therefore an appeal filed within the period of limitation or within
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTController of Estate Duty Vs. Estate of Late H.R. Goosey (by K.S. Naga ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Dec-17-1973
Reported in : [1974]97ITR193(Mad)
act 49 of 1962 or under article 240 of the constitution of india since the estate duty act was extended to situated outside india if the deceased was not domiciled in india at the time of his death he submitted further that de jure transfer after noting the constitutional changes made in articles 1 and 2 and the first schedule to the constitution from a civilised power remain under the laws of the power to which they originally belonged subject to the modifications introduced sufficient nexus to operate on his assets wherever situate equally parliament s power to legislate is beyond question where the properties india and india were respectively substituted the reason for this amendment given in the notes on clauses to the estate duty liable to be included in the estate of the deceased therefore on a proper construction of the provisions of sections 5
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT