Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results

Rudolph Vs. Alabama

Court : US Supreme Court

whether the eighth and fourteen amendments to the united states constitution permit the imposition of the death penalty on a convicted rape alaska arizona california colorado connecticut delaware hawaii idaho illinois indiana iowa kansas maine massachusetts michigan minnesota montana nebraska new nampshire of application as it would be deficient in efficacy and power its gene al principles would have little value and be snider v cunningham to consider whether the eighth and fourteen amendments to the united states constitution permit the imposition of the time works changes brings into existence new conditions and purpose therefore a principle to be vital must be capable of wider

Eliakutty and ors. Vs. Pudukkad Public Bank

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1963Ker195

discounted by nanappan anthony who was then manager of the bank where the applicant for restitution having another remedy open to adjudicated viz on 18 3 55 from that date under article 181 of the limitation act the petitioners get a period does not apply the next question is whether the inherent power of the court can be invoked for granting the refund 151 and order 21 rule 53 of code of civil procedure 1908 defendant s application for restitution of amount wrongfully realised in 0 s 38 22 against the respondent petitioners and therefore there is no bar for this petition i accept the

S. Krishnamachariar Vs. the Hanuman Bank Ltd. (In Liquidation) and ors ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1963Mad308; [1963]33CompCas543(Mad)

established that at least in english law no decision of indian courts having been brought to our notice that the requirement which had a puisne mortgage over the property we are therefore in respectful agreement with the decision of kuppuswami ayyar j

V. Kanakaiya Chetty and Co. and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Rep ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1963Mad394

is declared to be governed by section 151 of the indian contract act namely like that of a bailee who is it could not be said that any part of the articles recovered by the police belonged to the appellants we agree affirming the decree of the learned first assistant judge city civil court madras dismissing a suitinstituted by the appellants for recovery they should have taken under the statute the appellants will therefore be entitled to the damages claimed 10 the question then

Shri Nath and anr. Vs. Smt. Saraswati Devi Jaiswal

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1964All52

the divisional board or the state board the school tribunal constituted under section 8 of the maharashtra act cannot entertain appeals establishing and maintaining or assisting primary schools only the cantonment board is not required to enter into the area of secondary act 1978 act no 3 1978 sections 9 2 21 jurisdiction of school tribunal whether a school run by cantonment board the kind or degree indicated or implied by the context therefore the term such board will have to mean a divisional

Laxmi NaraIn and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1964All236

and therefore the extraordinary remedy under article 226 of the constitution could not be availed of by the appellants 5 our paramountcy of the british crown and after the independence of india they acceded to the dominion and eventually there was merger amounted to an infringement of his fundamental rights both under articles 19 and 31 of the constitution of india and relief was breach of the aforesaid conditions the local authority had powers to resume the grant the questions whether there have been their rights in bazar fatehganj which is pending before the civil judge mohanlalganj lucknow and 12 11 1962 was fixed in involved complicated questions of title and other material facts and therefore the extraordinary remedy under article 226 of the constitution could

Chhedi Lal Gupta and ors. Vs. Mohammad Sattar

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1963All448

learned civil judge a writ under article 226 of the constitution was riled by the defendants in the high court the the district judge of allahabad under section 73 of the indian trade marks act the learned additional civil judge decided the this decision of the learned civil judge a writ under article 226 of the constitution was riled by the defendants in any way prohibited the learned civil judge from exercising his powers under rule 10 of order 7 c p c which trade mark order 7 rule 10 of code of civil procedure 1908 and section 73 of trade marks act suit filed matter then it cannot proceed with the trial it follows therefore that when a court merely returns a plaint which is

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Umesh Chandra Gupta and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1963All601

and in the written statement filed by the union of india a plea was taken in paragraph 22of the written statement order of stay granted therefore in my judgment was without jurisdiction and it is accordinglyset aside 3 the application is allowed possible civil res subjudice section 10 of code of civil procedure 1908 revision filed against the orders of additional civil judge suit no 94 of 1957 the order of stay granted therefore in my judgment was without jurisdiction and it is accordinglyset

Shaik Piru Bork and ors. Vs. Kalandi Pati and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1964Ori18

of the allahabad high court there is nothing in the constitution to show that the right to take any procession as v smt rita devi 1997 2 glt 406 approved new india assurance co ltd v birendra mohan de 1995 2 gau that ground it was however held that the magistrate have powers to put restrictions under section 144 cri p c on as part of religious worship or not is within the civil rights of a community and that all worshippers in a deposit of statutory amount as embodies in the first proviso therefore an appeal filed within the period of limitation or within

Jagdish Prasad Vs. Manager, Modi Lantern Works

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1964All323; [1963(7)FLR124]; (1964)ILLJ126All

which is in pari materia with section 3 of the indian act the injury must be caused by an accident and s case that he was suffering from any disease and therefore the burden of proving the existence of any such disease