Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Year: 1977 Page 1 of about 301 results (1.012 seconds)State of Karnataka Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-08-1977
Reported in : AIR1978SC68; (1977)4SCC608; [1978]2SCR1
..... concerned they can only be amended by amendment of the constitution under article 368 now article 245 which gives power to make law for the whole or any part of the territory of india by parliament is subject to the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV. Rajeswara Rao Vs. Karna Ademma and ors.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jun-17-1977
Reported in : [1980]50CompCas140(AP)
bus and the tractor were insured later on the united india fire and general insurance company ltd came in the place 2 000 in all cases other than motor car was amended with effect from march 2 1970 raising the limit to inspector who was examined as p w 13 in the criminal case exhibit b 5 is his report which shows that b ii 4 and not by the policy we have therefore to hold that the representatives of the deceased would be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGokula Education Foundation (Regd.) and ors. Vs. the State of Karnatak ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Aug-02-1977
Reported in : AIR1977Kant213; ILR1977KAR1217
..... constitution 42nd amendment act 1976 these amendments have been necessitated since the jurisdiction ..... parliament has power to make laws these articles are concerned primarily with the distribution of the executive power ..... is the manner and procedure adopted in many forms ..... some provision of the constitution providing therefore fernandez s case ..... any amendment of this constitution made under art 368 5 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGeorge Maijo and Co. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jun-30-1977
Reported in : [1980]46STC41(AP)
read in the light of article 286 2 of the constitution in this connection we may also point out that in goods after the goods have crossed the customs frontiers of india as already pointed out sub section 3 of section 5 pradesh state legislature merely gave effect to the provisions of article 286 2 of the constitution 9 in this connection we no question of unconstitutional delegation of the parliament s legislative powers in favour of the state legislatures would arise at all is in the light of the principles formulated by the parliament for determining when a sale or purchase of the goods by andhra pradesh act 49 of 1976 and by this amendment items 19 and 20 were added to the second schedule which contemplate the issuance of notifications in accordance with the procedure ordained by the provisions specified supra in view of the open to the state legislature to adopt future law he therefore submitted that central act 103 of 1976 cannot be said
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrij Gopal Denga and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Nov-09-1977
Reported in : AIR1978MP122
determining the validity of such law hold it to be constitutionally invalid and b where the high court consists of less or assumed to exist madhav rao scindia v union of india 1971 3scr9 assuming that even an obiter dictum of the cause of justice flowing from the numerical rigidity prescribed by article 144a this was an appeal on certificate from a judgment the relevant statutes if these do not give any such powers as the respondent claims the difficulty can only be remedied observed that article 144a should engage the prompt attention of parliament so that it may by general consensus be so amended of cheap imitators of the west and the forty second amendment on the other hand was a result of the deliberations under the above cited provisions of the code of criminal procedure why cannot a division bench of the high court there presumed to act within the framework of the constitution and therefore the law enacted is presumed to be valid parliament by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT. Munuswami Naidu (Died) and ors. Vs. R. Venkata Reddi and ors.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jul-27-1977
Reported in : AIR1978AP200
prevailing body of legal doctrine based on private rights if constitutional law emphasises individual rights administrative law lays equal stress on common law of that state constitution of india and states india is a union of states the states and the territories of state policy making laws is placed under art 37 articles 245 and 246 read with the relevant entry in the s 10 the settlement officer is once again given the power to decide as to whether an estate was created before are appointed by the government departments why he asks has parliament made this radical departure in the allocation of judicial functions in estates in that province that act underwent very many amendments in the light of the developing situation as the winds into effect and within the scope of that act the procedure to be followed by the plaintiff was to file an completed without implementing either of the two purposes it is therefore reasonable to understand the intendment of the legislature while making
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHar Govind Pant Vs. Chancellor, University of Rajasthan and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Nov-08-1977
Reported in : AIR1978Raj72
office of the governor is an office created by the constitution article 153 the very nature of the office and functions shri raghukul tilak holds on employment under the government of india the whole controversy turns on the applicability of article 319 governor holds office during the pleasure of the president under article 156 the right of removability is part of control emperor r wade 3rd edition to the following effect the legal power of control over the civil service is nothing more than first schedule and if a member of either house of parliament or of a house of legislature of such state be meeting between them obviously brought about the university of rajasthan amendment act which was passed by the state legislature on july of the outgoing vice chancellor it should have followed the procedure laid down in section 12 1 i e by appointment therefore section 12 7 comes into play 70 the result therefore is that the writ petition fails and is dismissed there
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAhamadalli Mahamad Hanif Makandar Vs. Rabiya Alias Babijan Hasan Shaik ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-12-1977
Reported in : (1978)80BOMLR238
j 1 the above petition under article 227 of the constitution of india raises a very important point with regard to members of the wife s family among the muslims of india the minimum amount of dower varies between rs 40 to vaidya j 1 the above petition under article 227 of the constitution of india raises a very important clarify this position lest there be any doubt regarding the scope of section 127 3 b for at the first blush is payable on dissolution of marriage by death or divorce parliament must be presumed to know these well settled rules of the poorer sections of the community who become helpless the amendments made by the committee are aimed at securing social justice of sub section 3 of section 127 of the criminal procedure code 1973 hereinafter referred to as the said code if the applicant as per the receipt exh 17 whatever dues therefore were payable to the opponent under the personal law on
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSimpson and Co. Limited Vs. Joint Commissioner of Labour and ors.
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-07-1977
Reported in : (1977)ILLJ161Mad
police act and the proviso to article 309 of the constitution the rule is not assailed on the ground of lack any central act already in existence in any part of india under the legislature sway of the centre to the new assail the impugned rules on the ground of violation of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution is fragile the impugned disposal on merits no costs w p nos 3686 and 3687 of 1976 50 in these two writ petitions i passed tax act of 1922 under section 37 2 whether the power to search and seize could be exercised the question was has the same authority as the imperial parliament or the parliament of the dominion would have had under like circumstances to 1976 the state government had given notice of the draft amendment to the rules under the industrial disputes act dealing with rules made thereunder the provisions of the code of civil procedure should apply to all proceedings before the court etc it will be exposing himself even to the risk of prosecution therefore these two sections do not help in deciding the issue
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMisri Devi Vs. the Collector of Delhi and anr.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-27-1977
Reported in : ILR1977Delhi411; 1977RLR264
the question arose whether the action of the government was constitutional and if the public purpose was served by their action the union may be concerned 24 relying on union of india v prem kumar jain and others air1976sc1856 counsel contended that court sitting as a court of appeal and not under article 226 of the constitution of india see kaushalya devi and property for public use 30 true it is that these powers must not be abused for the purpose of serving a as well as a purpose of the union as the parliament has plenary powers of legislation for the union territories with the bombay lane requisition act act 33 of 1948 as amended by bombay act 39 of 1950 in that act the required for accommodating government officers offices of delhi administration in civil writ no 369 67 the collector in his affidavit in conform to the provisions of the act the first question thereforee is whether they were made for a state or public
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT