Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Court: gujarat Year: 1963 Page 1 of about 91 results (0.901 seconds)A.J. Patel and ors. Vs. the State of Gujarat and ors.
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Apr-18-1963
Reported in : AIR1965Guj234a
..... of power on he parliament under clause 1 of article 4 to amend the constitution by making supplemental incidental and consequential provisions the power to make supplemental incidental and consequential provisions can therefore ..... 1959 the deputy secretary to the government of india had addressed letters to various state governments laying down the procedure in connection with the publication of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Gujarat Vs. Mohamedeli Abdullabhai Panwala and ors.
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jan-18-1963
Reported in : (1963)4GLR717
prevention of gambling act is not an offence under the indian penal code and sub section 2 above applies to it that the position remains substantially the same even alter the amendment of section 10 of the gambling act by act no clear from sections 169 170 and 173 of the criminal procedure code the police can release an accused person if in person accused of an offence before a criminal court it therefore refers to the examination of a person who is concerned
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhulabhai Dahyabhai and anr. Vs. P.L. Gandhi and ors.
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Apr-09-1963
Reported in : (1964)5GLR130
now that is a question which was primarily within the jurisdiction of the learned appellate judge to determine it may be 32 33 one parbhubhai laxmidas was adjudged insolvent by the civil court at kathor which was in the baroda state territory debts of the petitioners had already been accepted and that therefore the application of the opponent no 2 calling upon the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChandulal Jethalal Jayaswal and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Aug-26-1963
Reported in : AIR1964Guj59; (1963)GLR1033
was pointed out that these conditions were inserted by the constitution makers in their anxiety to maintain the flow of trade freedom contemplated bythe corresponding section 297 of the government of indiaact 1935 and that whatever else it might or might notinclude is denatured and certain other ingredients in them make these articles unfit for potable purposes these articles have within its experience appear to suggest that the authority had uncontrolled and arbitrary power the authority is bound to act on reasonable grounds and another aspect might also be intra vires of the dominion parliament in other words what is properly to be called a with section 15 2 b of the indian criminal law amendment act 1908 as amended by the indian criminal law amendment business was concerned the supreme court considered the requirement of procedural reasonableness to be satisfied if the statute provided for an free flow of inter state trade and commerce we hold therefore that such an imposition is a colourable exercise of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Bharatkhand Textile Mfg. Co. Vs. the State of Gujarat
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Nov-22-1963
Reported in : AIR1964Guj219; (1964)GLR961; [1964]15STC885(Guj)
not within the inhibition of article 286 2 of the constitution the tribunal accordingly dismissed the revision application of the assessee only to sales in which the goods were consigned outside india and had no application where goods were despatched by rail directly and were an integral part thereof were saved under article 286 2 it is therefore clear that a sale cannot be an inter state sale and therefore beyond the taxing power of the state 4 applying this test let us see now by the sales tax laws validation act 1956 the parliament otherwise provided by lifting the ban imposed by article 286 did not rely on sub clause c and it was therefore entirely unnecessary for the tribunal to consider whether that sub
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Dharangadhra Chemical Works Ltd. Vs. I.G. Thakore
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Feb-06-1963
Reported in : AIR1963Guj283
exercising its powers under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution is not entitled to sit in appeal over the decision supreme court in the case of the automobile products of india ltd v rukmaji bala reported in s air 1955 sc industrial disputes act 1947 industrial disputes amendment act 1956 and articles 226 and 227 of constitution of india petition against refusal this special civil application raises very interesting questions regarding the powers of an industrial tribunal when dealing with an application made section section 33 as it stood immediately prior to its amendment in the year 1956 ran as under 33 during the remitted for decision in accordance with law 1 this special civil application raises very interesting questions regarding the powers of an their disposal takes time employers have complained that they are therefore prevented from taking action even in obvious cases of misconduct
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFirm of Amratlal Ravjibhai Vs. Firm of Pari Parshottamdas Harivallabha ...
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Apr-30-1963
Reported in : AIR1964Guj253; (1964)0GLR369
1 of code of civil procedure 1908 article 227 of constitution of india and rules 142 142 3 143 143 1 code of civil procedure 1908 article 227 of constitution of india and rules 142 142 3 143 143 1 144 and by the high court in exercise of its powers under article 227 of the constitution and section 122 of the code bound to go against the respondents and there was no power in the learned judge to grant tune to the respondent the provisions of order xxxvii of the code of civil procedure like the decision of the high court of bombay but under the ahmedabad city civil court rules this decision cannot therefore be called in aid by mr b j bhatt on
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPatel Raojibhai Kalidas Vs. State of Gujarat Sachivalaya, Ahmedabad
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jul-30-1963
Reported in : AIR1964Guj51
the nature of the issue to be determined and the constitution of the tribunal the general tests to be applied have transport corporation air1959sc308 and shivaji nathu bhai v union of india 1960 2scr775 now it may be mentioned that the statute as being void rule made absolute with costs civil removal article 226 of constitution of india and section 23 7 of question as though it were a trial they have no power to administer an oath and need not examine witnesses they the lord chancellor stated his views on the propriety of procedure in such cases the board of education will have to of rule 8 though that rule was not applicable it therefore clearly appears that there was no proper application of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamanbhai Ashabhai Patel Vs. Dabhi Ajitkumar Fulsinhji and ors.
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Mar-12-1963
Reported in : AIR1963Guj315
representation of the people act 1951 and article 173 of constitution of india appeal against order canceling election of appellant symbol nature of the election has been sought to be maintained india is a country where persons fellow numerous faiths in order 123 3 of representation of the people act 1951 and article 173 of constitution of india appeal against order canceling election a belief in any system of retribution by an overruling power it must i think include the principle of gratitude to symbols that may be chosen by candidates at elections in parliamentary or assembly constituencies and the restrictions to which their choice urged that the proceeding in this connection was a quasi criminal proceeding and that we must be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt of the people understand and appreciate that a distinction must therefore be drawn between canvassing on grounds of religion and seeking
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJamnadas Jethanand Vs. Shri Ram Aiyar
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jul-23-1963
Reported in : AIR1964Guj102; (1963)GLR897
rule discharged with costs civil administrative function article 226 of constitution of india and section 33 of bombay police act 1961 with costs civil administrative function article 226 of constitution of india and section 33 of bombay police act 1961 petition filed unreasonable restrictions affecting the fundamental rights of the petitioner under article 19 1 g and 2 that even if the restrictions a criteria to act to the commissioner while exercising this power dealing with the question whether the function entrusted to the passed that however is quite different from the well ordered procedure involving notice and an opportunity of hearing before an order an agent to act two things are clearly necessary until therefore that endorsement is made the person who is proposed to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT