Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Year: 1985 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.876 seconds)Hotel Dwaraka, Hyderabad Vs. the Union of India and ors.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-25-1985
Reported in : [1985]58STC241(AP)
..... basic features of our constitution and therefore the limitations on that power cannot be destroyed in other words parliament cannot under article 368 expand its amending power so as to acquire ..... the president gave his assent on 2nd february 1983 therefore the procedure contemplated under article 368 of the constitution for constitutional amendments has been complied with but the learned counsel for .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarayanamma Vs. District Registrar and Special Deputy Commissioner
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Aug-28-1985
Reported in : ILR1987KAR1064
all the dates of hearing in exercise of that appellate power i am of the view that the appellate authority had 179 of the karnataka registration rules which provides for the procedure for disposing of appeal that rule has altogether six sub that day neither the petitioner nor the counsel was present therefore the first respondent dismissed the appeal for non prosecution aggrieved
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVerkey and Co. Vs. Regional Labour Commissioner
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Mar-11-1985
Reported in : ILR1985KAR3359
the 1st respondent had no jurisdiction to pass the order indian contract act 9 of 1872 section 20 arali nagaraj j the establishment other than a mere supply of goods or articles of manufacture to such establish ment through contract labour or appropriate government to frame the rules in exercise of this power the central government has framed the central rules and the of the rules and the corresponding clause in the licence therefore rcspondcnt 2 had no jurisdiction to initiate action for payment
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSomasundaram P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-04-1985
Reported in : ILR1985KAR3412; [1985]152ITR664(KAR); [1985]152ITR664(Karn)
attracted that is precisely what the courts below have held indian evidence act 1872 c a no 1 1872 section 90 dependant set up a claim so as to attract the article of limitation act therefore article 57 is not attracted and contention we may briefly summaries the purpose of and the power conferred by s 104 of the act the object of much in the minds of the directors and they were therefore justified in not declaring any dividend so ran the contention
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMount Mettur Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Second Additional Labour Court, ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-10-1985
Reported in : (1985)IILLJ505Mad
in effecting retrenchment then labour court should exercise its discretionary power by ordering just amount of compensation instead of directing reinstatement for retrenchment the retrenchment has not been effected following the procedure in s 25f and therefore the persons who have put violation of s 25f in this case we have to therefore proceed on the basis that there is in fact a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShiv Raj Vs. Ram Prasad
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Apr-04-1985
Reported in : 1985WLN(UC)60
by the scribe attesting witnesses and the executants e civil procedure code execution of document proving of witness not remembering name time in the month of june or july 1964 and therefore the balance to be paid was only rs 19 000
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhanwar Singh and Sundra Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Jan-09-1985
Reported in : 1985(2)WLN612
government servant and was deputed in the election duty for parliamentary constituency could not attend the court and his counsel requested instructions judge disposing case with assistance of p p held procedure adopted is not proper he should have appointed amicus curiae of on merits but on a technical ground it is therefore expected that the learned sessions judge would hear the case
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShanker Singh Vs. Nahar Singh and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Aug-13-1985
Reported in : 1985WLN(UC)230
time or even thereafter prior to the promulgation of the constitution of india in 1950 the ground of vicinage was recognised even thereafter prior to the promulgation of the constitution of india in 1950 the ground of vicinage was recognised as a appeal was dismissed by the district judge gokul filed a civil appeal before the medhraj sabha but the appeal of gokul
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohd. Sayed Through Legal Representatives Sayabanu Wife and ors. Vs. N ...
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Jan-21-1985
Reported in : 1985WLN(UC)19
6 there would be no order as to costs civil procedure code section 51 execution prayer for tending judgment debtor to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gyan Prakash Gupta
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Jul-26-1985
Reported in : 1985(2)WLN389; 1985(2)WLN389
assessment order was completed under section 23 3 of the indian income tax act 1922 the old act without issuing notice against the assessment the appellate assistant commissioner has inter alia power to annul the assessment or set aside the assessment and mohanlal gupta section 143 of the act lays down the procedure for completing the assessment it provides that a notice before of the deceased the estate was only partially represented and therefore the assessment of the income of the deceased chooharmal wadhuram
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT