Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Year: 2023 Page 1 of about 303 results (1.577 seconds)Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi Vs. Union Of India
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-11-2023
..... amendment of the constitution for the purposes of article 368 which deals with the power and procedure to amend the constitution thus article 239aa 3 balances between the interest of nctd and the union of india 45 this constitutional ..... has been granted such power by the constitution or a law of parliament therefore the executive power of nctd in the absence of a law by parliament shall extend to all .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re Article 370 Of The Constitution
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Dec-11-2023
..... article 368 of the constitution provides for the procedure by which the constitution may be amended clause 2 of article 368 is extracted below power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor 2 an amendment of this constitution ..... framework of the constitution of india and that constitution alone 159 in adopting the constitution of india we the people constituted india into a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State Of Telangana Vs. M/s Tirumala Constructions
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-20-2023
..... of article 368 underwent a change after the constitutional 25th amendment act of 1971 before that amendment the title of the provision was procedure for amendment of the constitution by virtue of the amendment article 368 is described as power of parliament to amend the constitution and the procedure therefor article 368 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLok Prahari Vs. Union Of India
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-27-2023
constitution bench in kuldip nayar v union of india4 the constitution bench held that after the amendment voting to the council 1141 of 2020 lok prahari petitioner s versus union of india ors respondent s judgment dr dhananjaya y chandrachud cji1the jurisdiction of the single transferable vote as regards the legislative councils article 171 3 d stipulates that one third of the members reportable in the supreme court of india civil original jurisdiction writ petition civil no 1141 of 2020 lok prahari petitioner be a matter of concern for 4 2006 7 scc16 parliament if it finds that electors were resorting to cross voting union of india4 the constitution bench held that after the amendment voting to the council of states has undergone a material been urged is that as a consequence of the above procedure the elector would lose the right to vote under article ground that the voting procedure had been violated there is therefore a compulsion on the voter to show his vote 12
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion Of India Vs. Cosmo Films Limited
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-28-2023
javed v state of haryana35 observed that there is no constitutional compulsion that a law or policy should be implemented all the provisions of gst it was held in union of india uoi ors v vkc footsteps india pvt ltd39 that a retention of the power to impose pre import conditions on articles other than those specified in appendix 4j meant that the applicable duty even before fulfillment of export obligation 42 exercising powers conferred under paragraph 1 03 of ftp the dgft notified payment of tax under clause ii of the first proviso parliament has envisaged a refund of unutilized itc where the credit aa in the erstwhile ftp regime were rescinded through the amendment introduced in the scheme by notification no 26 2017 customs the sake of convenience the revenue shall direct the appropriate procedure to be followed conveniently through a circular in this regard their affairs to be in accord with the new law therefore the exclusion of benefit of imports in anticipation of aas
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner, Customs Central Excise And Service Tax, Patna Vs. M/s. S ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-13-2023
function entrusted to a municipality under article 243w of the constitution 8 having outlined the relevant legal framework under consideration we rourkela are institutions incorporated under central statutes i e the indian institute of technology act 1961 the 1961 act hereafter and to carry out any function entrusted to a municipality under article 243w of the constitution 8 having outlined the relevant legal reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no 3991 2023 commissioner customs central excise and as parliament does not use any word without meaning something parliament does not legislate where no legislation is called for parliament a notification dated 30th january 2014 clarification notification hereafter this amendment re defining governmental authority sought to broaden the scope of service providers or subcontractors within their premises the appeals2 in civil appeal no 3991 of 2023 ca i hereafter the appellant authority an amendment by way of the clarification notification was therefore introduced which expanded the definition of governmental 14 authority and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTYashpal Jain Vs. Sushila Devi
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-20-2023
backseat in light of the fundamental duties enshrined in the constitution specifically article 51a j which obligates every citizen to strive 10 00 000 people the supreme court recommended in all india judges association vs union of india 2002 4 scc247 to nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement article 51a is to be understood to be in a positive contended that shri rajendra prasad jain was the holder of power of attorney of urmila devi and on his rajendra prasad adjournments continued to dominate and obstruct speedy trial therefore the parliament amended the law once again and now an attempt is provision of rule 1 of order xvii of cpc as amended has to be understood and given effect to a party are contributing to such delays either directly or indirectly the procedure that is being adopted by the courts below or specifically to subserve and not to delay or defeat justice 22 therefore while considering the prayer for grant of adjournment it is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAshwini Kumar Upadhyay Vs. Union Of India
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-02-2023
violation of a fundamental right in part iii of the constitution the former is not in issue 12 permitting a candidate 967 of 2017 ashwini kumar upadhyay petitioner versus union of india and another respondents judgment dr dhananjaya y chandrachud cji1the petitioner implicate the provisions of article 14 or a violation of article 19 it would not be possible for this court to judgment dr dhananjaya y chandrachud cji1the petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this court under article 32 of the constitution to of the people whether or not held simultaneously from all parliamentary constituencies from more than two parliamentary constituencies b in the the chief election commissioner urged the then prime minister to amend section 33 7 of the act of 1951 insofar as vote after knowing about a candidate s character qualifications and criminal antecedents among other details when a candidate who contests from
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.l. Swamy Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-13-2023
applied even to pending proceedings is erroneous and against the constitution bench decision of this court in the case of commissioner reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no 3704 of2012k l swamy reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no 3704 of2012k l swamy appellant s versus income is to be taxed is specified every year by parliament in the finance act in contradistinction when it comes to to add or to mention section 158bc by way of amendment through finance act 2002 it would not make any difference act which deals with block assessment lays down a special procedure for search cases the main reason for adding these provisions machinery for assessment of undisclosed income for the block period therefore in case of the person other than searched person the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Of Himachal Pradesh Vs. The Recovery Officer, Debt Recovery Trib ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-28-2023
in the tax act this is in the scheme of constitutional provisions also therefore the bank is well within its right brevity pnb hereafter sanctioned term loan to m s superrugs india pvt ltd for brevity borrower hereafter for manufacturing carpets the in pnb invoking the jurisdiction of the high court under article 226 by filing a writ petition5 against the state the to take recourse to section 151 it preserves the inherent powers of the court to do justice in a case where reserve bank under section 3 of the securitisation act evidently parliament did not intend to give 22 priority to the dues a secured creditor we need not dilate here on the amended provisions for obvious reasons 38 what appears to be of hplr act to the extent the same provides for the procedure for recovery of dues as arrears of land revenue needs order 47 rule 1 cpc as observed in foregoing decisions therefore only for taking different view the said order dated 07
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT