Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Year: 1992 Page 1 of about 302 results (1.195 seconds)Shri Kihota Hollohon Vs. Mr. Zachilhu and Others
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-18-1992
Reported in : AIR1993SC412,JT1992(1)SC600,1992(1)SCALE338,1992Supp(2)SCC651,[1992]1SCR686
..... part of article 368 is as under 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefore 1 notwithstanding anything in this constitution parliament may in exercise of its constituent power amend by way ..... the constitution of india and therefore the amendment would require to be ratified in accordance with the proviso to sub article 2 of article 368 of the constitution of india 25 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDalpatraj Bhandari Vs. the President of India and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Apr-13-1992
Reported in : AIR1993Raj1
..... constitution 39 in minerva mills ltd v union of india air 1980 sc 1789 their lordships of the supreme court have observed that article 368 does not enable parliament ..... procedure results in chaos amongst eligibles and therefore ..... india article 142 of the constitution provides that the supreme court in the exercise of its jurisdiction ..... the fourteenth amendment of the american constitution so the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKamal Bidi Factory Vs. Cegat
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Sep-14-1992
Reported in : 1994LC291(Allahabad); 1993(64)ELT387(All)
for appeal will in fact violate article 14 of the constitution in my opinion the appellate authority cannot act arbitrarily in there is violation of article 14 of the constiution of india it amounts to denial of substantive right cesa section 35f taken then the provision for appeal will in fact violate article 14 of the constitution in my opinion the appellate authority article 14 of the constitution in my opinion the appellate authority cannot act arbitrarily in the matter of waiver or stay
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrasadh Kumar Vs. Ravindran
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Apr-01-1992
Reported in : 1992CriLJ3203; II(1992)DMC162
and they are accordingly dismissed family custody article 226 of constitution of india petitioner alleged to be husband of daughter of are accordingly dismissed family custody article 226 of constitution of india petitioner alleged to be husband of daughter of respondent petitioner these twooriginal petitions and they are accordingly dismissed family custody article 226 of constitution of india petitioner alleged to be husband j b koshy a k basheer k p balachandran jj civil contempt limitation under section 20 held aggrieved party should file
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDev Raj Vs. State of Punjab
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-11-1992
Reported in : AIR1992SC950; 1992CriLJ1292; 1992(1)Crimes980(SC); JT1992(2)SC302; 1992(1)SCALE608; 1992Supp(2)SCC81; 1992(2)LC65(SC)
liable be convicted for offence under section 326 appeal allowed indian penal code 1860 c a no 45 1860 section 379 applicable in comparison to section 360 cr p c the scope of section 4 of the probation of offenders act is 360 or any other provision of the code of criminal procedure therefore by virtue of section 8 1 of the general or any other provision of the code of criminal procedure therefore by virtue of section 8 1 of the general clauses
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBanwari and ors. Vs. Income Tax Officer and anr.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-25-1992
Reported in : [1992]195ITR651(SC); 1993Supp(1)SCC619
could be dealt with with the aid of section 34 indian penal code in this view that the high court took indian penal code 1860 and sections 245 2 of criminal procedure code 1973 one partner of a partnership firm examined by an interim stay of further proceedings in the trial court therefore for more than a decade now the proceedings have been
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Patel Chemo Pharma P. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Laxmibai Ramchandra Iyer an ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-07-1992
Reported in : 1993Supp(2)SCC174
m n venkatachaliah and a s anand jj code civil procedure 1908 mdash section 35 and order 17 rule 1 2
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAssistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shyam Lal Saraf (Also Shyam L ...
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-09-1992
Reported in : (1993)46TTJ(Del)385
appeal a substantial reduction being effected by the first appellate authority both the parties are aggrieved the revenue in respect of exigible the nature of penalty proceedings continues to be quasi criminal and existence of means read or guilty mind is to discharge onus to prove the genuineness of cash credit penalty thereforee sustained held the penalty under section 271 1 c is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTindo-swiss Synthetic Gem Mfg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Mar-20-1992
Reported in : 1992(40)ECC31; 1992(59)ELT345(Mad)
as to costs refund customs change of law writs under constitution petitioner importing silica crucibles paying customs duty under heading 70 products the supreme court has also clearly held in miles india limited case supra that it is open to the party should be equal to the excise duty on a like article manufactured in india 3 the petitioner filed a claim petition application under art 226 of the constitution the court has power to direct the refund unless there has been avoidable laches sub sections 1 and 2 of sec 27 of the amended act do not empower the assistant collector to entertain an which the application for refund should be made and the procedure to be followed by the authority concerned viz the assistant scrap themselves for the manufacture of chemicals the petitioners have therefore not passed on the duty paid by them on copper
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC. Subramani Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax and Another
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Sep-10-1992
Reported in : [1993]202ITR347(KAR); [1993]202ITR347(Karn)
which the whole decision is based is that once the power is exercised by the commissioner that power cannot again be accordance with law rule made absolute accordingly code of civil procedure 1908 section 148 a s pachhapuri j enlargement of time power had not been exercised prior to the impugned order therefore in the impugned order itself he could have considered the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT