Skip to content


Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Court: mumbai Year: 1963 Page 1 of about 97 results (1.66 seconds)
Dec 18 1963 (HC)

Shiramabai Vs. Kalgonda Bhimgonda and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-18-1963

Reported in : AIR1964Bom263; (1964)66BOMLR351

could never have been intended by the legislature 6 we therefore hold that the interest of a hindu mitakshara coparcener available

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 14 1963 (HC)

Vithalrao Rajaram Hingwe Vs. M.K. Joshi and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-14-1963

Reported in : AIR1964Bom63; (1963)65BOMLR599

to him under the provisions of article 227 of the constitution and in the second alternative that the appeal be treated mr mandlekar to two decisions of the supreme court of india reported in chandrika prasad v shiv prasad air1959sc827 and to court under article 142 of the constitution said powers under article 142 of constitution is not available to the high court by supreme court under article 142 of the constitution said powers under article 142 of constitution is not available to the as it originally stood without the explanation and before its amendment by act 40 of 1961 and held that an order a revision under section 115 of the code of civil procedure and be disposed of as such in view of these dismiss the election petition or even purport to dismiss it therefore if the terms of the impugned order were to be

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 10 1963 (HC)

Ramkrishna Ramnath and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-10-1963

Reported in : AIR1964Bom51; (1963)65BOMLR726; [1963(7)FLR373]; ILR1963Bom672; (1963)IILLJ548Bom

142 of the constitution said powers under article 142 of constitution is not available to the high court hence no protection by supreme court under article 141 of the constitution of india said observations directions are issued in exercise of powers under would depend upon exercise of discretion by supreme court under article 142 of the constitution said powers under article 142 of form an integral scheme are outside the purview of the powers conferred on the respondent by section 5 of the act the minimum wages act 1948 as it stood before the amending act of 1961 minimum rates of wages can be fixed the advice of the committee and without taking the alternative procedure mentioned in section 5 1 b dan it be said the members of the committees and the board there is therefore a clear distinction drawn between the staff of the board

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 19 1963 (HC)

Vithalrao Rajaram Hingwe Vs. M.K. Joshi and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-19-1963

Reported in : AIR1964Bom107; (1963)65BOMLR612

of this court under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution 3 having regard to the pronouncements of their lordships qf was not under the control of the election commission of india and cannot be regarded as a voucher in compliance with with finding of fact in exercise of the jurisdiction under article 226 that was m an appeal by special leave from would certainly entitle us to interfere even under our constitutional powers 27 in paragraph 13 in dealing with the question whether to section 117 was deleted the sub section therefore after amendment now stands as follows the tribunal shall dismiss an election revision application under section 115 of the code of civil procedure we did not pronounce upon those alternative prayers but having made in compliance with section 117 of the act and therefore the petition for substitution could not be considered when the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 06 1963 (HC)

Mahendra Bhawanji Thakar Vs. S.P. Pande and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-06-1963

Reported in : AIR1964Bom170; (1963)65BOMLR674; ILR1964Bom163; 1964MhLJ157

the equal protection clause embodied in article 14 of the constitution he was referring to the facts of suraj mall mohta of which the impugned notice under section 34 of the indian income tax act came to be issued against the petitioner case because that decision is absolutely binding upon this court article 145 5 therefore uses the word judgment both with regard a condition was laid down to he exercise of the power namely that definite information should have come into possession of what is more important for our purposes is the further amendments in 1956 by the finance act of 1956 which took a recent decision in section c prashar v vasantsen dwarkadas civil appeal no 705 of 1957 d 12 12 1962 1963 not affect clause ii of the first proviso and must therefore be read along with it and an attempt made to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 09 1963 (HC)

Ramkishore Pandit Vs. Vijayabahadursingh Jagtapsingh

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-09-1963

Reported in : AIR1964Bom85; (1963)65BOMLR712; ILR1964Bom202

law declared by supreme court under article 141 of the constitution of india said observations directions are issued in exercise of and v s desai jj in jaswantlal v western company india 61 bom lr 1087 these cases are not really relevant said observations directions are issued in exercise of powers under article 142 of the constitution and also have no application to or those arising under the act necessarily carries the ancillary powers for creatively implementing its decision in importers and v pheroze and by bombay act 44 of 1948 the act was amended and the words city civil court were also added and cause courts act 13 to provide by chapter vii summary procedure for expeditious recovery of possession of immovable property from a cases is vested only in the special court and that therefore the bombay city civil court has no jurisdiction to entertain

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 03 1963 (HC)

Chhotelal Verma Vs. the Corporation of the City of Nagpur

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-03-1963

Reported in : (1964)66BOMLR502

consider whether the discretionary relief under article 226 of the constitution should be granted or not in cases where an alternative there has been considerable delay in approaching this court under article 226 hence the discretionary relief sought for should not be act itself by section 123 confers on the corporation the power to appoint an officer to determine the annual value of in the resolution the corporation may after considering such objections amend the resolution and the proposals as contained in the amended necessary powers were not delegated to the assessor and the procedure adopted for the reassessment was not sanctioned by the statutory objections were decided the tax payers were not heard and therefore that determination of the objections is illegal being opposed to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 04 1963 (HC)

The Usha Prints India Private Ltd. Vs. the Employees State Insurance C ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-04-1963

Reported in : AIR1964Bom94; (1963)65BOMLR701; ILR1964Bom187; (1963)IILLJ544Bom

issued in exercise of powers under article 142 of the constitution and also have no application to the cases relating to by supreme court under article 141 of the constitution of india said observations directions are issued in exercise of powers under said observations directions are issued in exercise of powers under article 142 of the constitution and also have no application to other hand one must bear in mind that the word power includes any other form of energy which must be transmitted our powers under o 41 rule 27 of the civil procedure code and we therefore called upon the appellants to produce against them for contribution under the act it is not therefore as if the appellants have been taken by surprise when

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 22 1963 (HC)

Hotel Mazdoor Sabha Vs. Alvares N.J. and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-22-1963

Reported in : 1964MhLJ540

1 in this petition under art 226 of the constitution the petitioners have claimed directions against respondent 1 chief inspector accused was charged inter alia under s 153a of the indian penal code the charge was that the accused had attacked meaning of the act labour and industrial applicability of act article 226 of constitution of india and section 2 25 of court found that there was no justification in principle or authority to regard common employment as quality which constituted those employed charged inter alia under s 153a of the indian penal code the charge was that the accused had attacked in the as for the protection of visitors to these places he therefore contends that the provisions of the act should be construed

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 24 1963 (HC)

Ramubai Vs. Jiyaram Sharma

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-24-1963

Reported in : AIR1964Bom96; (1963)65BOMLR647

issued in exercise of powers under article 142 of the constitution and also have no application to the cases relating to by supreme court under article 141 of the constitution of india said observations directions are issued in exercise of powers under court under article 142 of the constitution said powers under article 142 of constitution is not available to the high court by supreme court under article 142 of the constitution said powers under article 142 of constitution is not available to the same leasehold interest the lease is not properly terminated and therefore the suit based on such notice is untenable in law

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //