Constitution Of India Article 368 Power Of Parliament To Amend The Constitution And Procedure Therefor - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: constitution of india article 368 power of parliament to amend the constitution and procedure therefor Year: 1960 Page 1 of about 302 results (1.008 seconds)In Re: the Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves Reference Under Art ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-14-1960
Reported in : AIR1960SC845; [1960]3SCR250
..... 368 of the constitution that article provides for the procedure for the amendment of the constitution and expressly confers power on parliament in that behalf the power to amend constitution must inevitably include the power to amend ..... by the constitution both of these essential attributes of sovereignty are outside the constitution and can be exercised by india as a sovereign state therefore even if .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNalluri Venkataraju and anr. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Apr-15-1960
Reported in : AIR1961AP50
..... by parliament under articles 2 and 3 of the constitution are not subject to the limitations contained in article 368 that article excludes the amendments authorised by articles 2 and 3 from the category of amendments contemplated by article 368 hence .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSeth Mathuradas Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madhya Pradesh and Bho ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-22-1960
Reported in : [1962]44ITR517(SC)
fresh partition be made between the parties the union of india was sought to be made a party to the suit applicable in comparison to section 360 cr p c the scope of section 4 of the probation of offenders act is the probation of offenders act and the code of criminal procedure wanted to obviate the provisions of the probation of offenders this finding rightly held against the appellant the appeal is therefore dismissed with costs 4 civil appeal no 207 of 1959
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNedungadi Bank Ltd. Vs. Central Bank of India Ltd.
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Apr-06-1960
Reported in : AIR1961Ker50; [1960]30CompCas511(Ker)
0 0 on the ground that the central bank of india limited was negligent in the discharge of its duty as had branch office will not give court of that place jurisdiction to entertain suit court of plaintiff s state incompetent to kozhikode under section 20 a of the code of civil procedure 1908 it is possible to institute a suit where the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Coimbatore Vs. Nonshi Devshi Katawalla (Pt ...
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Aug-24-1960
Reported in : [1962]45ITR47(Ker)
provided by sub section 5 of section 66 of the indian income tax act 1922 question answered in the negative labour amended qualifications prescribed by special rules state government has the power to frame or amend the special rules with or without section as it then stoodon may 24 1953 by an amendment the law was changed retrospectively from april 1 1952 the the interest under the amended section 18 a 5 and therefore there was no reassessment within the meaning of section 34
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV. Srinivasa Naicken Vs. Agricultural Income-tax Officer, Palai.
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Sep-19-1960
Reported in : [1963]47ITR122(Ker)
of 30 days prescribed by section 22 2 of the indian income tax act 1922 chagla c j in commissioner of amended qualifications prescribed by special rules state government has the power to frame or amend the special rules with or without to amendment cannot be filled up by candidate not possessing amended qualifications prescribed by special rules state government has the power a return to verify and to give particulars it seems therefore clear that a return of income or particulars as to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFilmistan (Private) Ltd., Bombay Vs. Its Workmen
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Nov-01-1960
Reported in : (1961)ILLJ138Bom
vessel to carry rock phosphate from togo to west coast india dispute arose between parties under agreement respondent had chosen mumbai legislature enacts a law and when in exercise of the powers conferred by the legislature government frames rules they are enacted that the company needed some skilled moulders temporarily and that therefore some recruitment of skilled moulders was made on 18 april
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Uttar Pradesh and ors. Vs. Babu Ram Upadhya
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-25-1960
Reported in : AIR1961SC751; 1961CriLJ773; (1970)ILLJ670SC; [1961]2SCR679
that art 309 is subject to the provisions of the constitution and therefore subject to art 310 and therefore any law the notes within the meaning of section 405 of the indian penal code if so the information discloses a cognizable offence constitution and under clause 2 b thereof nothing in this article shall prevent parliament or the legislature of the state from tenure and provided a condition precedent to the exercise of power by his majesty provided by sub section 1 of section under art 310 as qualified by art 311 5 the parliament or the legislatures of states can make a law regulating india act 1915 for the first time in 1919 by amendment statutorily recognized this doctrine but it was made subject to the police regulations framed under section 7 provided a certain procedure to be followed with respect to cases in which a to make a law abrogation or modifying the said tenure therefore any law made by appropriate authorities conferring a power on
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: K.R.P.L. Chockalingam Chettiar
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Mar-16-1960
Reported in : (1960)2MLJ425
to the fundamental rights guaranteed in part iii of the constitution those provisions would be treated as repealed and inoperative by madras v c g menon and anr 1955 1scr280 the indian extradition act must be deemed to have been struck down indian extradition act 1903 though adopted under the provisions of article 372 of the constitution has not kept those provisions alive act in question in the case of british india this power has been exercised by the order in council dated the phrase part of the law of the dominion refers to parliamentary enactments which extend to india and therefore are part of india omitted by a l o 19 50 b to amend the law relating to the extradition of criminals in cases in return and which at the same time regulate the procedure in extradition cases thus as oppenheim points out section 330 operated by virtue of tne legislation of the united kingdom therefore chapter iii of the indian extradition act will continue to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKalyan Singh Vs. Baldev Singh and anr.
Court : Himachal Pradesh
Decided on : Aug-11-1960
Reported in : AIR1961HP2
also it was held that article 320 3 of the constitution of india was not mandatory in nature 18 the learned in clause 3 of article 320 of the constitution of india and in the case of state of u p v mandatory the use of the word shall in the aforesaid article was not held to be material and it was held was intra vires and not beyond the scope of the powers of the rule making body that the petitioner was guilty territorial councils act on the table of the houses of parliament i does not render the rules invalid or inoperative 19 or amended and it is then that the rules as amended become effective if no amendments are made the rules come the officer contemplated by the aforesaid provision of the civil procedure code was a ministerial officer appointed by the district judge case air 1960 sc 137 referred to above 13 it therefore follows that before an error of law can be rectified
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT