Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. Rajbir Timber Traders vs Anik Walia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 04th May, 2026 + CM(M) 1013/2026, CM APPL. 29818/2026, CM APPL. 29819/2026 & CM APPL. 29820/2026 M/S. RAJBIR TIMBER TRADERS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mankan Deep Singh Bammi, Mr. Manish Kumar and Ms. Nida Akhtar, Advocates.versusANIK WALIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Parvez Bashista and Mr. Malay Misra, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER (Oral)Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner/plaintiff underArticle 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, assailing the order dated 09th April, 2026, passed by the learned Trial Court in CS (COMM) No. 225/2023, whereby the application filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Order XVIII Rule 17 read with Order XVI Rule 1 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, (CPC) seeking summoning of witnesses has been dismissed.3. Learned counsel for the ...
M/S Hari Das Tour and Travels Through Its Proprietor Sh. Pardeep Kumar ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5982/2026 & CM APPL. 29345/2026 M/S HARI DAS TOUR AND TRAVELS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SH. PARDEEP KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepak Manchanda, AdvocateVersusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amish Tandon, Advocate for R-1 Ms. Monica Benjamin, SSC for R-2CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 04.05.20261. Against the Order in Original whereby claim of the petitioner for refund of tax is rejected, remedy of statutory appeal is provided.2. In that view of the matter, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the present petition with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the statutory remedy of appeal.3. A request is made from the petitioner for expeditious disposal of appeal, which we expect the Appellate Authority to consider based on the existing pendency.4. The petition stands disposed of in above terms.5. Pending application also stand...
Rajesh Kumar vs State Gnct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1715/2026&CRL.M.A. 13817/2026 RAJESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vineet Jain, Advocate.versusSTATE GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP with Insp. Sanjeev.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 04.05.20261. Applicant seeks interim bail for a period of 45 days in case FIR No. Section 302/34 IPC.2. According to learned counsel for applicant, the applicant has a historyof metal plates implanted in the left infra-orbital/zygomatic region and one plate was removed on 25.09.2024 i.e. prior to his arrest in the present. The treating doctors have advised removal of the remaining plate after an interval of about six months to prevent infection, nerve damage and other complications.3. Admittedly, earlier, the petitioner had filed an application seeking interim bail before the learned Trial Court but such application was dismissed by the learned Trial Court on 07.01.2026.4. Thereafter, the app...
Rahul Chauhan & Ors. vs the State (Gnct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3380/2026, CRL.M.A. 13661/2026-Exp. RAHUL CHAUHAN & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Hemant Kunal, Advocate with petitioners in personversusTHE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh and Ms. Apoorva Khosla, Advocates with SI Reena, SI Kashish Mr. Harshvardhan Singh Sood, Mr. Dinesh Kr., Advocates for R-2 in R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 04.05.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Article 227 of theConstitution of India and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.185/2024 dated 22.04.2024 registered at PS: Dwarka North, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Settlement Agreement dated 27.09.2025 [Annexure P-2] arrived between the petitioner no.1...
M/S Eagle Hunter Solution Limited Through Shri B B Pandey Manager Lega ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 + LPA 332/2026 & CM APPL. 29612-13/2026 M/S EAGLE HUNTER SOLUTION LIMITED THROUGH SHRI B B PANDEY MANAGER LEGAL COMPLAISANCE .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ram Prakash Sharma, Adv.versusASHOK KUMAR TIWARI .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIATEJAS KARIA, J. (Oral)1. The present Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgmentdated 27.03.2026 (Impugned Judgment) passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 12244/2019 (Writ Petition) filed by the Appellant against the award dated 11.10.2018 (Award) passed by the learned Labour Court in a claim application filed by the Respondent.2. By way of the Impugned Judgment, the Writ Petition challenging theAward, whereby the Respondent had been granted reinstatement with full back wages, continuity of service and all consequential benefits, was disposed of by modifying the relief to direct the Appellant to...
Tarun Singh vs State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~78, 79 & 62* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 4th May, 2026. Uploaded on: 6th May, 2026 + CRL.A. 448/2026& CRL.M.A. 13816/2026 TARUN SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjiv Kumar and Mr. Dheeraj Jagwani, Advs.versusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP with Mr. Lalit Luthra and Ms. Divya Yadav, Advs. for State. SI Mukul, P.S. Keshav Puram. Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Mr. Sanjeet Kumar, Ms. Shweta Singh & Mr. Shiv Chopra, Advs. 79 WITH + CRL.A. 449/2026& CRL.M.A. 13827/2026 TARUN SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjiv Kumar and Mr. Dheeraj Jagwani, Advs.versusSTATE AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP with Mr. Lalit Luthra and Ms. Divya Yadav, Advs. for State. SI Mukul, P.S. Keshav Puram. Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Mr. Sanjeet Kumar, Ms. Shweta Singh & Mr. Shiv Chopra, Advs. 62 AND + CRL.A. 445/2026& CRL.M.A. 13657/2026 TARUN SINGH .....Appellant Digitally S...
Dp @L vs the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 1701/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13689/2026 DP @L .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate (through videoconferencing).versusTHE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP with SI Ranjana, PS Subzi Mandi. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. The accused/applicant seeks interim bail in case FIR No. 134/2025 of Police Station Subzi Mandi for offence under Section 64(2)/351(2) of BNS.2. The name of the accused/applicant has been anonymized in order toconceal the identity of rape victim, the minor girl, who happens to be the niece of the accused/applicant. According to prosecution, the accused/applicant aged about 40 years raped his niece. The prosecutrix has supported the prosecution case in her testimony before the trial court. BAIL APPLN. 1701/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4 5569af3962c6fb4835d435...
Lalit Kumar & Ors. vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1430/2026 LALIT KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Anuj Kumar, AdvocateversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC with Mr. Arjit Sharma and Ms. Sakshi Jha for the State with ASI Rakesh KuamrCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 04.05.20261. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 344/2025 of Police Station Dwarka South for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the basis of settlement arrived at between the parties.2. On being pointed out the serious allegations of sexual misconduct against brother-in-law and father-in-law of respondent no. 2, counsel for petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition.3. As requested, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. GIRISH KATHPALIA, J MAY 4, 2026 rsThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown abov...
Sonu and Ors. vs State of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~109-Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3400/2026 SONU AND ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R. Singh Arora, Adv.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP along with Mr. Abhimanyu Arya, Adv SI Santosh Mr.Gaurav Nigam for R-2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 04.05.20261. The petitioners have instituted the present petition under Section528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]), seeking quashing of FIR No. 0806/2021 dated 21.11.2021, registered at Police Station Nangloi, Outer District, Delhi, under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.2. Issue notice. Ms. Manjeet Arya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice on behalf of State. Mr. Gaurav Nigam, lear...
Yatender Sharma & Anr. vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6014/2026 & CM APPL. 29598/2026 YATENDER SHARMA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Chetna & Mr, Subit Kumar Singh, Advocates.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Ms. Shweta Singh, Mr. Sanjeet Kumar & Mr. Shiv Chopra, Advocates for R-1/MCD. Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, Senior Panel Counsel for UoI with Ms. Asmita Mishra, Ms. Shreya Jha , Mr. Hitesh Kumara Sharma & Ms. Supriya, Advocates for R-2. Mr. Shivam Gaur, Government Pleader for R-2/UoI. Mr. Aditya Gogna, Advocates for R-3 & 4/ Private respondents. Ms. Chand Chopra & Mr. Punishk Handa, Advocates for R-5/DDA.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 04.05.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs: W.P.(C) 6014/2026 Page 1 of 32. Along with the petition, the petitioner has placed on record a showcause notice dated 4th June, 2024, followed by a demolition or...