Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Alina Francis vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 + BAIL APPLN. 1698/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13668/2026 ALINA FRANCIS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Garg, Ms. Anishka Bagla, Mr. B. L. Garg and Mr. Vivek Balhara, Advocates.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP with SI Azad Singh, PS Mayur Vihar Phase-1. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 52/2026 of Police Station Mayur Vihar, Phase-I for offence under Section 318(4)/112(2) BNS.2. Broadly speaking, according to prosecution case, theaccused/applicant is involved in cyber fraud related to online jobs. It appears that upon receipt of multiple online complaints from across the country, the Delhi Police launched a special drive titled Operation CyHawk 3.0 to BAIL APPLN. 1698/2026 Page 1 of 4 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af396 2c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI...
Master Adhiraj Singh Jamwal Through His Mother Mrs Pooja Kapoor vs Del ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6017/2026 MASTER ADHIRAJ SINGH JAMWAL THROUGH HIS MOTHER MRS POOJA KAPOOR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Ekta Bhasin, Adv.; Mr. R Sudhinder, Adv.; Ms. Aastha Trivedi, Adv.; Mr. Sanidhya Sonthalia, Adv.; Mr.Anand Amit, Adv.versusDELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL, MATHURA ROAD & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mittal, Sr. Adv. (Appearance not given) for R1 Mr. Premtosh K Mishra (CGSC), Mr. Arpit Bamal, Mr. Anubhav Upadhyay, Mr. Shrey Sharma, Advs. for UOI/R2-3 Mr Dhruv Rohatgi Panel Counsel GNCTD Ms Chandrika Sachdeva Mr Dhruv Kumar, Advs. for R4-5 Mr Santosh Kumar Rout SC for R6CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 04.05.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:- a. Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ,order or direction directing Respondents No. 1 to 5 to considerand decide, in a time-bound and reasoned manner, the representation dated 10.0...
Nisha Sharma Through Spa Holder Milan Sharma vs Municipal Corporation ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 334/2026 & CM APPL. 29673-74/2026 NISHA SHARMA THROUGH SPA HOLDER MILAN SHARMA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Vinod Kumar M, Mr. Hem Kumar and Mrs. Niharika M., Advs.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 04.05.20261. On being pointed out that this intra-court appeal may not bemaintainable under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to seek appropriate remedy, which may be available to the appellant under law.2. Accordingly, the present appeal alongwith pending applications stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ TEJAS KARIA, J MAY 4, 2026 jThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The ...
Arjit Tyagi vs Directorate General of Foreign Trade
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6052/2026 and CM APPL. 29806/2026 ARJIT TYAGI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Mannat Sandhu, Ms. Vritti Jain, Advocates.versusDIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE .....Respondent Through: Mr.Vinay Yadav, CGSC with Mr.Mrityunjay Mahendra GP.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 04.05.2026 CM APPL. 29807/2026 (for exemption)1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6052/2026 and CM APPL. 29806/20261. The petitioner vide the instant petition seeks for directions against therespondent- Directorate General of Foreign Trade (hereinafter DGFT) to deal with the petitioners complaints/ representations. The petitioner submits that he has shown concern regarding regulatory violations by certain DGFT approved Pre-Shipment Inspection Agencies (hereinafter PSIAs).2. Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the Court deems it appr...
Sh. Ashish Dabas & Anr. vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6008/2026 & CM APPL. 29582/2026 SH. ASHISH DABAS & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashutosh Rana, Advocate.versusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. M. S. Akhtar, Ms. Joohu Kumari and Mr. Kushagra Dixit, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 04.05.20261. The Petitioners are the purchasers of immovable property comprising:(i) residential land admeasuring 04 biswa and 15 biswasi out of Khasra Nos.405 (0-07); and (ii) industrial land admeasuring 03 biswa and 05 biswasi out of Khasra Nos. 143/839 (0-05), 143/893 (0-2.5) and 143/85 (0-05), situated in Lal Dora of Village Kanjhawala, Delhi - 110081.2. It is stated that the aforesaid property was purchased by the Petitioners from the erstwhile owner, Mr. Ajay Kumar, for valid sale consideration, and a Sale Deed dated 30th March, 2026 was duly executed in their...
Abhishek Goswami vs Rekha Giri & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 242/2026, CRL.M.A. 13695/2026, CRL.M.A. 13696/2026, CRL.M.A. 13697/2026 ABHISHEK GOSWAMI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. H.N. Pandey, Adv.versusREKHA GIRI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 04.05.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Sections 438/442 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks to challenge the order dated 11.03.2026 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Courts, District North-East, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Mt. No. 371/2022 titled Smt. Rekha Giri vs. Abhishek Goswami.2. However, after some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law.3. The present petition, alongwith the pending applications, is dismissed as withdraw with liberty as prayed for. SAURABH BANERJEE, J MAY 4, 2026/AbThis is a digitally sign...
X....S.... vs the State of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3406/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13742/2026 X....S.... .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravindra S. G., Ms. Liyi Marli Noshi and Mr. Dani Uja, Advocates.versusTHE STATE OF NCT DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 04.05.20261. The petitioner herein is the child victim and on the basis of her report,FIR No. 0139/2019 dated 24.04.2019, was lodged at P.S. Sarita Vihar, for commission of offences under Sections 376/354/506 IPC and Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 (POCSO Act).2. The prayer in the present petition is limited one.3. It is submitted that abovesaid FIR was registered way back in April,2019 and charge-sheet was filed in the same year and even the charges were framed by the learned Trial Court on 19.08.2019, however, so far, only two witnesses have entered into witness box and the testimony of one such witness is yet not co...
Renew Naveen Urja Private Limited vs Solar Energy Corporation of India ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6007/2026 & CM APPL. 29538/2026 RENEW NAVEEN URJA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sujit Ghosh, Senior Advocate with Ms. Mannat Waraich and Mr. A. Thakur, AdvocatesversusSOLAR ENERGY CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anushree Bardhan, Ms. Ritika Singh, Ms. Somya Sahni and Ms. Rashmi Vaish, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 04.05.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction torespondent no.1/ Solar Energy Corporation of India Limited (SECI) to maintain status quo and not encash the Performance Bank Guarantees for the amount of Rs.36 Crores given by the petitioner. It is stated that the said Performance Bank Guarantees have an expiry date of 30th June, 2026.2. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has filed apetition bearing No.169/MP/2024 before the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) along w...
Sh Rahul Lamba and Ors vs the State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3361/2026, CRL.M.A. 13623/2026 SH RAHUL LAMBA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Satvik Bajaj, Adv.versusTHE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Upasana Bakshi, Mr. Dinesh Kumar and Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advs. Ms. Poonam Kumar, Adv. for R-2 SI- Harish Kumar, PS: Mansarovar Park and ASI- Rakhi, PS: Vivek ViharCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 04.05.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 0069/2022 dated 20.01.2022 registered at PS.: Mansarovar Park, Delhi under Section 498A/406/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860(IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of Settlement Deed dated 29.11.2025 [Annexure C] arrived between the petitioner no.1 and the respondent no.2, which is accompanied by their respective proofs of identities.2. I...
Trendy Security Services vs Delhi Development Authority and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5971/2026, CM APPL. 29317/2026 and CM APPL. TRENDY SECURITY SERVICES .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin Yadav, Mr. Aman Yadav, Ms. Kalyani Tehri, Mr. Shiv Yadav, Ms. Anushka Sharma, Ms. Nisha Rani, Advs.versusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Standing Counsel with Mr. Shivam Takiar, Mr. Prateek Dhir, Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Advs. for DDA.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 04.05.20261. Through the present Petition, the Petitioner seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the tender process in respect of GeM Bid No.GEM/2026/B/7398475 DATED 27.03.2026.2. Pursuant to the NIT, various bidders submitted their tenders, and the technical bids were opened on 06.04.2026. After that, as many as eight (08) bidders were declared qualified at that stage.3. Now, the Petitioner has sent Notice contending that theSolvency Certif...
- ‹ Prev
- 439
- 440
- 441
- 442
- 443
- 445
- 446
- 447
- 448
- 449
- Next ›
- Last »