Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sunil Kumar vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 960/2026 SUNIL KUMAR .....Applicant Through: Mr. Divyendu Sorayan and Mr. Anil Sharma, Advs.versusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar APP for State with Mr. Dinesh Kr., Ms. Upasna Bakshi and Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advs. Insp. Ritesh Raj, SI- Abhishek Singh, PS: Wazirabad Mr. Prashant Prabhakar, Adv. forR-2CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 04.05.20261. By virtue of the present application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 the applicant seeks grant of regular bail in proceedings arising out of FIR No.78/2023 dated 20.01.2023 registered at PS: Wazirabad under Sections 302/325/201/147/2. Succinctly put, as per prosecution the aforesaid FIR was registeredon receipt of information on 20.01.2023 regarding a quarrel between the families of the complainant and the applicant (paternal uncle/ chacha of the complainant), who were alre...
Vinod Kumar Parcha vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3824/2026 VINOD KUMAR PARCHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Bhardwaj, Advocate.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS......Respondents Through: Mr. Rohit Kathuria, Mr. Dhruv Varma, Mr. Harshit and Ms. Nikita Dubey, Advocates for R-1/MCD. Mr. Akhil Mittal, Ms. Riddhi Jain and Ms. Shayna Das Pattanayak, Advocates for DDA. Mr. Amit Gupta and Mr. Vidur Dwivedi, Advocates for R-3/Delhi Police. Mr. Sunit Chaprana, S.I., P.S. Jagatpuri.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 04.05.20261. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 25th March, 2026, statusreport has been filed on behalf of respondent no.3/Delhi Police. Paragraph 7 of the status report is set out below:-W.P.(C) 3824/2026 Page 1 of 32. In view thereof, a direction is issued to the Delhi Police to thoroughlyinvestigate the aspect which is mentioned in paragraph 7 of the status report.3. The Delhi Police shall also undertake a...
Pro-Interactive Services (India) Private Limited vs Sajm Brand Hub Pvt ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 419/2026, I.A. 6515/2026PRO-INTERACTIVE SERVICES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ruchin Midha, Advocate.versusSAJM BRAND HUB PVT. LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Dev Rishi, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 04.05.20261. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(5) of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by the Petitioner seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties under a Contract bearing reference no. Pro/Facility Services/2022 executed between the Petitioner and the Respondent in May, 2022 (hereinafter referred to as the Contract).2. It is stated that under the Contract, the Petitioner agreed to providesecurity and facility services by employing its personnel/employees at the facilities as identified by Respondent at different locations. Disputes arose between the parties regarding the nature and mann...
Vijay Tyagi vs North Delhi Municipal Council
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 04.05.2026 + ARB.P. 527/2026 & I.A. 8260/2026 (Delay of 2 days in Re- filing the petition)VIJAY TYAGI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arpit Sharma, AdvocateversusNORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Saurabh Seth, Standing Counsel for NDMC with Mr. Abhiroop Rathore and Mr. Kabir Dev, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKAR% JUDGEMENT (ORAL)1. The present Petition, filed under Section 11(6) of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [Act], seeks the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for the purpose of resolution of disputes inter se the parties arising out of the Clause 25 of the Work Award Letter No.EE(BM-I)/D/16/837-849 dated 21.06.2013, which reads as under: 25(ii). Except where the decision has become final, binding and conclusive in terms of Sub Para (i) above, disputes or difference shall be referred for adjudication through arbitration...
Vikram Sharma vs Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 22.04.2026Pronounced on: 04.05.2026+ W.P.(CRL) 806/2026 VIKRAM SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr.C.M. Grover and Ms.Payal Budhiraja, Advs.versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, SC (Crl.) with Ms.Priyam Agarwal, Mr.Aryan Sachdeva, Mr.Abhinav Kr. Arya for R-1 to R-3/State with SI Gunjan Singh, ER-II, Crime Branch Mr.Suraj Prakash Sharma, Adv. for R-4 to R-7CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAJUDGMENTNAVIN CHAWLA, J.1. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as BNSS), seeking issuance of a Writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus, directing production of the minor daughter of the petitioner- Ms. XXX, who is in the custody of the respondent nos.4 to 6, that is the parents-in-lawDigitally Signed W.P.(CRL) 806/2026 P...
Bardi Devi vs State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 4th May, 2026IN THE MATTER OF:+ CRL.A. 329/2004 RAJU .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kuldeep Kumar & Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, Advs with Appellant in person.versusSTATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State. Mr. Shailesh Chandra Jha, Adv (DHCLSC) for victim / R-2.+ CRL.A. 330/2004 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 674/2004 BARDI DEVI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kuldeep Kumar & Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, Advs with Appellant in person.versusSTATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State. Mr. Shailesh Chandra Jha, Adv (DHCLSC) for victim / R-2.+ CRL.A. 535/2004 SHAMBHU .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kuldeep Kumar & Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, Advs with Appellant in person.versusSTATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State. Mr. Shailesh Chandra Jha, Adv (DHCLSC) for victim / R-2.Signed By:PRIYA CRL.A. 329/2004, 330/2004 & 535/2004 Page 1 of 8CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAVJUDGMENT (ORAL)V...
Raju vs State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 4th May, 2026IN THE MATTER OF:+ CRL.A. 329/2004 RAJU .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kuldeep Kumar & Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, Advs with Appellant in person.versusSTATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State. Mr. Shailesh Chandra Jha, Adv (DHCLSC) for victim / R-2.+ CRL.A. 330/2004 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 674/2004 BARDI DEVI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kuldeep Kumar & Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, Advs with Appellant in person.versusSTATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State. Mr. Shailesh Chandra Jha, Adv (DHCLSC) for victim / R-2.+ CRL.A. 535/2004 SHAMBHU .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kuldeep Kumar & Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, Advs with Appellant in person.versusSTATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State. Mr. Shailesh Chandra Jha, Adv (DHCLSC) for victim / R-2.Signed By:PRIYA CRL.A. 329/2004, 330/2004 & 535/2004 Page 1 of 8CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAVJUDGMENT (ORAL)V...
Virender Narang vs Kusum Sandhu
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 610/2004 VIRENDER NARANG .....Appellant Through: Mr. Akshat Aggarwal, Mr. Akshay Arora and Ms. Deeksha Jha, Advs. Appellant-in-person (through V.C.).versusKUSUM SANDHU .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAVORDER% 04.05.20261. Hybrid Mode.2. It is pointed out by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of theAppellant that the initial appeal was filed by the father of Appellant namely Sh. Ved Prakash Narang against the Respondent herein Kusum Sandhu. However, certain developments took place in between, which has created a situation, where the Appellant does not want to continue with the appeal anymore, inasmuch as the original Appellant i.e. Ved Prakash Narang is no more.3. It is submitted by Mr. Virender Narang (through V.C.) that he is notsure about the fact regarding death of Kusum Sandhu, as it was her husband S. Mokham Singh, with whom things were dealt with, who ha...
Yogesh Sharma @Yogi vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 845/2026 YOGESH SHARMA @YOGI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocate.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC (Crl.)CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 04.05.20261. By way of the present petition under Article 226 of theConstitution, the petitioner seeks quashing of an order dated 23.12.2025, passed by the Superintendent-II, Prison Head Quarters, Tihar, New Delhi, by which his request to be lodged in a Semi-Open Jail was rejected.2. Mr. Siddharth Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitsthat the present petition has been rendered infructuous, as the petitioner has already been granted regular bail.3. The petition is therefore dismissed as withdrawn.PRATEEK JALAN, JMAY 4, 2026SS/AD/This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The...
Abhishek Dutta vs Income Tax Officer & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1223/2020ABHISHEK DUTTA .....PetitionerThrough: Mr. N.K. Kantawala, Mr. Yatin Sharma, Mr. Siddharth Vardhman and Mr. Nishant Kanjawala, Advs.versusINCOME TAX OFFICER & ANR. .....RespondentsThrough: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, SSC, Mr. Shivendra Singh and Mr. Yojit Pareek, JSCs and Mr. Surya Jindal, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 04.05.20261. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seekspermission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (hereinafter referred to as CIT(A)) and raise all objections and grounds, which have been raised in the present petition.2. With the liberty as prayed, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.3. In case the appeal is preferred within a period of thirty days fromtoday, the CIT(A) shall consider the appeal on its merit witho...
- ‹ Prev
- 432
- 433
- 434
- 435
- 436
- 438
- 439
- 440
- 441
- 442
- Next ›
- Last »