Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Akash vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1709/2026 AKASH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumer Singh Boparai, Mr. Shubha, Raj Anand, Mr Surya Pratap Singh and Mr. Abhilash Kumar Pathak, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP for State. Insp Parveen and Insp Rakesh Malik.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 04.05.2026 CRL.M.A. 13726/2026 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 1709/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13725/20261. By way of the present application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the applicant seeks grant of regular bail in connection with FIR No. 1017/2021 dated 11.08.2021, registered at Police Station Sultanpuri, Outer District, Delhi, for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.2. The applicant had last approached the learned Sessions Court seeking regular bail in the year...
Shri Anuj Dabas vs Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited Tpddl & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6063/2026 & CM APPL. 29855/2026 SHRI ANUJ DABAS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Ms. Jyoti, Mr. Riya Jha and Mr. Arjun Bansal, Advocates.versusTATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LIMITED TPDDL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Kumar Srivastava, Mr. Moksh Arora and Mr. Santosh Ramdurg, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 04.05.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief: W.P.(C) 6063/2026 Page 1 of 22. Mr. Manish Kumar Srivastava, counsel appearing on behalf of therespondents, has handed over the following documents to the counsel for the petitioner in Court: i. Aadhar Card of the petitioner. ii. Undertaking dated 10th June, 2016, of the petitioner. iii. Affidavit/NOC dated 30th May, 2016 of Mr. Manish (cousin of the petitioner). iv. Sale Deed dated 25th June, 2014, between Mr. Aman Aggarwal and Mr. Manish. 2.1. Mr. Srivastava submits that these are ...
Sushant Singh Tokas & Ors. vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~108-Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3395/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13717/2026 SUSHANT SINGH TOKAS & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Sahrawat and Mr. Sahil Sharma, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP with SI Ram Dayal Meena.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 04.05.20261. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]), seeking quashing of FIR No. 0350/2025 dated 02.09.2025, registered at Police Station Neb Sarai, District South, Delhi under Sections 85/316(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, [BNS], alongwith all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.2. Issue notice. Mr. Hitesh Vali, learned Additional PublicProsecutor, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Respondent No. 2 ...
Ritesh Kumar vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3405/2026, CRL.M.A. 13741/2026-Exp. RITESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ambuj Tiwari and Mr. Kishan Yadav, AdvocatesversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Mr. Dinesh Kumar and Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advocates alongwith SI K. P. Singh, PS New Ashok Nagar Mr. Aryan Bhardwaj, Advocate for R-2 alongwith R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 04.05.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 164/2018 dated 13.04.2018 registered at PS.: New Ashok Nagar, Delhi for offence under Sections 354(D)/341/506/509 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom in view of the Settlement Agreement dated 15.02.2026, [Annexure P8] arrived at between the petitioner and the respondent no.2, which is acco...
Ashok Bhatia & Anr. vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 789/2026 ASHOK BHATIA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Chitrakshi, Advocate.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tajinder Virdi, SC, MCD (through v/c).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTASACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL.29725/2026 (Exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CONT.CAS(C) 789/2026 and CM APPL.29724/20263. The present petition alleges wilful disobedience of the order dated27.08.2025, passed in W.P.(C) 13029/2025. The said order inter-alia directs as under: 11. Having heard learned counsels for the parties, this Court notes that the present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners before this Court on account of the fact that, at present, there is no Presiding Officer in the Appellate Tribunal MCD (ATMCD).12. This Court further notes the submissions made by learned counsel forrespondent-MCD t...
Truth Fashion vs S.K Singh Special Commissioner & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 484/2025 TRUTH FASHION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.A. Ansari, Mr. Tabbassum Firduse Ahmad Ansari, Mr. Imran Ahmad, Advs.versusS.K SINGH SPECIAL COMMISSIONER & ANR......Respondents Through: Ms. Vaishali Gupta (Adv.)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTASACHIN DATTA, J. (Oral)1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging wilfuldisobedience/ non-compliance of the directions contained in the order dated 10.02.2025 passed in W.P(C) 486/2025. The said order reads as under:-Signature Not Verified CONT.CAS(C) 484/2025 Page 1 of 7Signature Not Verified CONT.CAS(C) 484/2025 Page 2 of 7Signature Not Verified CONT.CAS(C) 484/2025 Page 3 of 7 2. The background of the matter is that an appeal came to be filed by thepetitioner before the Objection Hearing Authority/GST Additional Commissioner...
Ramesh vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4561/2024 RAMESH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Charanjit Sharma and Ms. Mata Sharma, Advs.versusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, SC, with Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. M. S. Akhtar, Mr. Kushagra Dixit, Ms. Joohu Kumari, Advs.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 04.05.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Article 226of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking release of the amount of compensation in respect of the land in question being Khasra No. 58//16min(1-11) & 25min((1-4) situated at the revenue estate of Village Pooth Khurd, Delhi.3. On 9th September, 2009, a notification was issued qua the land of thePetitioner under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The award being Award No.02/2012-13 has also been passed on 5th September, 2012. However, ...
M/S Aditya Thermopack Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Managing Director, Sanjay ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 340/2026, I.A. 11198/2026 & I.A. 11199/2026M/S ADITYA THERMOPACK PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SANJAY RAJPUT .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Ishita Pandey, Adv.versusORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yashish Chandra, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 04.05.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended by six months.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, J MAY 4, 2026 ChThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown ab...
Hsil Ltd. & Anr. vs ICICI Securities Ltd and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(OS) 126/2020 HSIL LTD. & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Manav Gupta, Mr. Sahil Garg, Mr. Ankit Gupta, Mr. Abhinav Jain, Mr. Mithil Malhotra and Mr. Aryan Pandey, Advocates.versusICICI SECURITIES LTD AND ORS. .....Defendant Through: Mr. Kapil Wadhwa and Ms. Apoorva Maheshwari, Advocates for D4 to D6.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 04.05.2026I.A. 12269/2026 (joint application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC)1. The present application has been jointly filed by the parties fordecreeing the suit in terms of settlement agreement dated 01.04.2026.2. It is stated in the application, that during pendency of the present suit,parties have arrived at a settlement, terms whereof have been reduced in writing in the form of settlement agreement dated 01.04.2026, a copy of which has been annexed to the present application as Document no.1.3. Learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties s...
Anita vs Jatinder Kumar
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 711/2026 & CM APPL.27041/2026 ANITA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Archana Gaur, Adv. along with Petitioner- In-Person.versusJATINDER KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Ms. S. Pani, Adv. along with Respondent in Person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTASACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL)1. The present petition alleges wilful disobedience of the directionscontained in the order dated 20.03.2026 passed by this Court in CONT.CAS(C) 206/2025.2. It is noticed that vide order dated 20.03.2026 it was directed as under:-Digitally Signed CONT.CAS(C) 711/2026 Page 1 of 43. The above order was passed in the backdrop of the fact that therespondent was not adhering to the earlier order dated 18.04.2024 passed by the Family Court, in terms of which the respondent was directed to handover the custody of the concerned child to the petitioner within a period of eight weeks therefrom and certain visitation righ...
- ‹ Prev
- 437
- 438
- 439
- 440
- 441
- 443
- 444
- 445
- 446
- 447
- Next ›
- Last »