Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Chhatwal Electricals Through Its Proprietor vs Smt. Praveen Kahtoo ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4644/2019 M/S CHHATWAL ELECTRICALS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradeep Agarwal, AdvocateversusSMT. PRAVEEN KAHTOON AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vijay Kasana, Advocate for respondent No.2CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 04.05.20261. The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the impugnedorders dated 26.05.2016, passed by the learned Commissioner, Employees Compensation, Distt. South West, Pratap Nagar, New Delhi, in Case No. ECD-05/15/DLC/SWD, whereby the compensation to the tune of Rs. 8,67,640/- along with interest came to be awarded in favour of respondent No.1 herein, as well as the subsequent order dated 20.08.2018, whereby the petitioners application seeking setting aside of the aforesaid order was dismissed.2. Briefly stated, respondent No.1, who was the petitioner in theunderlying petition, had initially filed a claim petition under the provisions of the...
Boxing Federation of India vs Delhi Amateur Boxing Association & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 234/2025 & CM APPL. 19054-57/2025 BOXING FEDERATION OF INDIA .....Appellant Through: Mr.Vishnu Sharma A.S., Adv. with Mr. Yasharth Mishra, Mr. K.R. Sasiprabhu and Ms. Namrata Saraogi, Advs.versusDELHI AMATEUR BOXING ASSOCIATION & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Premtosh K. Mishra, CGSC with Mr. Anubhav Upadhyay, Advs. for R- 2/UOI.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 04.05.20261. Learned counsel for the appellants states that he has instructions towithdraw the instant appeal.2. Accordingly, the appeal along with pending applications is dismissedas withdrawn.DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJTEJAS KARIA, J MAY 4, 2026 shailndraThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/05/2026 at 11:50:13...
Mansi Sharma vs Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5879/2026 & CM APPL. 28859/2026, CM APPL. MANSI SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sohit Bhardwaj, Mr. Rahul Kushwaha, Mr. Pardeep Kumar Karhana, Mr. Ishu Jain, Advs.versusCHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Mr. Navneet Thakran, Mr. Aditya Awasthi, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 04.05.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- 1. Issue a Writ of mandamus directing restoration of possession of the Suit Property to the petitioner;2. Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing Respondent to ceaseall interference with the petitioner's property;3. Issue a Writ of Prohibition restraining Respondent fromfurther executing the impugned order insofar as it affects the petitioner;4. Quash the order dated 09.01.2024 to the extent itauthorizes possession of the petitioner...
Surjeet Singh vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4888/2025 & CM APPL. 22505/2025 SURJEET SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anup Kumar, Mr. Achint Priya, Ms. Arshi & Ms. Neha Jaiswal, Advocates (through video- conferencing)versusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddhant Nath, Standing Counsel for MCD with Mr. Bhavishya Makhija & Mr. Amaan Khan, Advocates for MCD Mr. Abhinav Singh & Mr. Nikhil Rajput, Advocates for R-1. Ms. Pushti Gupta, SPC for R- 3, 4 & 6. Ms. Shalini Tripathi, Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, Ms. Pratibha Singh & Mr. Shakeel Ahmed, Advocates for R-7-11. Mr. A.K. Mishra, Ms. Alphy Thomas & Ms. Kajal Mishra, Advocates for R-12. SI Manish Kumar Swami & HC Namonarayan, P.S.: Hazrat Nizamuddin.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 04.05.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to W.P.(C) 4888/2025 Page 1 of 2respondents to take steps for removal of unauthorized encroachmen...
Devendra Public School vs Central Board of Secondary Education
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5780/2026 & CM APPL. 28468/2026 DEVENDRA PUBLIC SCHOOL .....Petitioner Through: Kirtiman Singh Sr Adv, Mr. Yasharth Shukla, Mr. Naman Shukla, Mr. Astu Khandelwal, Ms. Taha Yasin, Mr. Maulik Khurrana, Advs.versusCENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manisha Singh, AdvCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 04.05.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- i. Issue a writ or direction in the nature of Certiorari and/or thereof setting aside the Order dated 02.01.2026 passed by the Respondent dis-affiliating the Petitioner school; and/or ii. Issue a writ or direction in the nature of Certiorari and/or thereof to set aside the Show Cause Notice dated 18.09.2025 passed by the Respondent; and/or iii. Issue a writ or direction in the nature of Certiorari and/or thereof setting aside the Inspection Report dated 31.07...
Sanjay Kumar vs State Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1350/2026, CRL.M.A. 12966/2026, CRL.M.A.SANJAY KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vipin Sanduja, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Mr. Lovhesh Aggarwal, Mr. Sarthak Ahuja, Mr. Nihal, Mr. Vidhtaan and Mr. Sourav Sharma, Advs.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC Insp. Mahesh, PS: Krishna Nagar and Insp. Sachin Kumar Verma, PS: Shakar Pur Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey, CGSC with Ms. Gurleen Kaur Warach, Mr. Kntarth Upadhayay and Mr. Amulya Dev Mishra, Advs. for R-4 Respondent no.5 in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 04.05.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Articles 226 and 227 of theConstitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner inter alia seeks the following reliefs:i. Direct Respondent No.1 to 4, to delete the LOC opened against the Petitioner; i. Set Aside the Order dated 23.03.2026 passed...
Braham Prakash vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5665/2026 BRAHAM PRAKASH .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Adv.[appearance not given].versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Tyagi, SPC with Mr. Ravi Mittal, GP with Ms. Arushi Mittal, Adv. with DC Mr. Anand Kumar, DC Anand Kumar, Insp. Sanjay Kumar, SI Atul Sen, Constable Sandeep Kumar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 04.05.20261. The only claim of the Petitioner in the present Petition is withregard to the payment of the TA/DA Bill, which was previously rejected by the Respondents on the ground that he claimed it later than the prescribed period of six months.2. Learned counsel representing the Respondents submits that theTA/DA Bill has been paid to the Petitioner on 27.04.2026 and hence, the present Petition is rendered infructuous.3. Accordingly, and since the TA/DA Bill has already been paid tothe Petitioner, the present Petition...
Sunil Rani Tiwari and Anr vs Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5931/2026 SUNIL RANI TIWARI AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Simarpal Singh Sawhney, Mr. Siddhant Juyal, and Mr. Aditya Sarma, Advocates.versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Urvi Mohan, Advocate for GNCTDCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 04.05.20261. The instant petition is for the following reliefs:-i. Issue a writ of Certiorari quashing the order dated 17.04.2026 passed by the Respondent No. 1 after receipt of enquiry report from the Respondent No. 2 in the matter Sh. Dinesh Kumar Tewari & Anr. v. Sh. Mayank Tewari & Anr. bearing Case No. 20/2025/ DC(S)/417 420 ii. Direct the Respondent No. 3 and 4 to vacate the residence of the Petitioners with immediate effect iii. Pass such other order or further order(s) as this Honble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the present case.2. The order dated 17.04.2026 passed by respondent no.1 i.e. Dist...
Ajit Singh vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6003/2026 & CM APPL. 29418-29419/2026 AJIT SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Smita Maan, Mr. Vishal Maan, Mr. Kartik Dabas and Ms. Hasrat Kaur, Advocates.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Deepal Goel and Mr. Vignesh, Advocates for R-1 (through VC) Mr. Bhav Ratan, SPC for UoI. Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate for R-3 & 4 (through VC)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 04.05.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to therespondent no.1/MCD to demolish the unauthorised construction being raised by the private respondents no.3 and 4 at property bearing no.589, Jhankar Gali, Chirag Delhi, New Delhi-110017 (hereinafter subject property). A further direction is sought to stop the ongoing construction at the subject property.2. The petitioner resides in the property immediately adjoining the subject property. It is stated that the private respondents...
Rohina vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1697/2026 ROHINA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chetan, Advocate (through videoconferencing).versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP with SI Arvind, PS Gokalpuri.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 04.05.20261. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 320/2021 of Police Station Gokulpuri for offence under Section 302/201/34 IPC.2. Broadly speaking, allegation of the prosecution is that theaccused/applicant and her husband killed the deceased by squeezing his private parts because he tried to rape the accused/applicant. But the post- mortem report does not show any injury on private parts of the deceased. According to post-mortem report, death of the deceased was due to strangulation. According to prosecution, since only the deceased and the accused/applicant and her husband were alone inside the tenanted premises, it is the accused/applicant and her husband, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 438
- 439
- 440
- 441
- 442
- 444
- 445
- 446
- 447
- 448
- Next ›
- Last »