Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mahagun India Pvt Limited vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 04.05.2026 + W.P.(C) 3368/2026, CM APPL. 16187/2026 MAHAGUN INDIA PVT LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S. K. Gupta and Mr. Raj Kumar, Advs.versusREGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER.....Respondent Through: Mr. Braja Bandhu Pradhan, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTASACHIN DATTA, J. (Oral)1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging wilfuldisobedience of the directions contained in the order dated 01.12.2025 passed by the learned Central Government Industrial Tribunal (CGIT), Delhi, whereby the application of the petitioner under Section 7O of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, has been disposed of. The said order reads as under: 1. This order shall dispose of an application filed by the appellant under section 7-0 of the Act (hereinafter referred to as tithe the Act"), wherein he has stated the condition of pre-deposit before entertaining th...
Shambhu vs State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 4th May, 2026IN THE MATTER OF:+ CRL.A. 329/2004 RAJU .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kuldeep Kumar & Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, Advs with Appellant in person.versusSTATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State. Mr. Shailesh Chandra Jha, Adv (DHCLSC) for victim / R-2.+ CRL.A. 330/2004 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 674/2004 BARDI DEVI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kuldeep Kumar & Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, Advs with Appellant in person.versusSTATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State. Mr. Shailesh Chandra Jha, Adv (DHCLSC) for victim / R-2.+ CRL.A. 535/2004 SHAMBHU .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kuldeep Kumar & Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, Advs with Appellant in person.versusSTATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State. Mr. Shailesh Chandra Jha, Adv (DHCLSC) for victim / R-2.Signed By:PRIYA CRL.A. 329/2004, 330/2004 & 535/2004 Page 1 of 8CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAVJUDGMENT (ORAL)V...
Stanley Chukwuebuka Ibe vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 912/2025 STANLEY CHUKWUEBUKA IBE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Maneesh Bhardwaj and Mr. Fahad Siddiqui, Advocates.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 04.05.2026Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition. The petition is disposed-of as withdrawn, without expressing any observations on the merits of the matter. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, JMAY 4, 2026/akThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 11:36:42...
Bizloan Private Limited vs Surender Lal & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 385/2026, I.A. 5691/2026 BIZLOAN PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhinav Bhatia and Ms. Sakshi Jain, Advocates.versusSURENDER LAL & ANR. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 04.05.20261. It is stated by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the matter hasbeen settled by the parties. She, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the present Petition.2. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.3. The Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the Petitionerto approach this Court once again by filing a fresh Petition in case the terms of the settlement are not adhered to by the Respondents.4. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, JMAY 4, 2026RahulThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown abov...
Raj Kumar Jain vs M/S Shree Balaji Enterprisies and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~J-1* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 26.02.2026Judgment Delivered on: 04.05.2026+ CRL.M.C. 1665/2023 & CRL.M.A. 6359/2023 RAJ KUMAR JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sangeeta Jain, Advocate.versusM/S SHREE BALAJI ENTERPRISIESAND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ram Ekbal Roy, Mr. Aman Nihal, Mr. Shekhar Jha and Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANJUDGMENTVIKAS MAHAJAN, J1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 CrPC inter aliapraying for quashing of the complaint bearing no. 2712/2012 dated 04.08.2012, under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [in short N.I Act].2. The case set out in the present petition is that an order no.166/PA/DNC/DEMS/2009-10 was passed by the Commissioner of MCD on 26.06.2009 regarding the deployment of Auto Tippers with Hydraulic Lifting arrangements in each ward of the Shahdara (North) and (South) Zones for a period of three years.3. The resp...
M/S Pratap University & Ors. vs Dr. Sl Grover & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~43 to 45* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 475/2026 & CM APPL. 14304/2026 44. + CM(M) 476/2026 & CM APPL. 14306/2026 45. + CM(M) 477/2026 & CM APPL. 14308/2026 DR. SL GROVER & ANR. .....RespondentsCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 04.05.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, at this stage, the presentpetitions have become infructuous. It is, accordingly, prayed that the present petitions be disposed of as withdrawn.3. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned counsel for thepetitioner, the present petitions are disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed ofRAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, JMAY 4, 2026/nd/abk...
Anish Yadav vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 04.05.2026+ BAIL APPLN. 1146/2026 ANISH YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shyam Babu and Kunal Madan, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State with IO/SI Hardeep.CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAJ U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 175/2025 ofPolice Station Anand Parbat for offence under Section 109(1)/132/221/3(5)/49 BNS and Section 25/27 Arms Act.2. Broadly speaking, the prosecution allegation is that on 24.02.2025,when a police party on the basis of a secret information visited the spot, the present accused/applicant with his associates were consuming someBAIL APPLN. 1146/2026 Page 1 of 4 pagesserialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, Date: 2026.05.04 17:51:34 -07'00'intoxicant and on seeing the police party, co-accused Ravi Paswan stabbed the complain...
M/S Pratap University & Ors. vs Shri Manavjit Singh Sandhu & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~43 to 45* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 475/2026 & CM APPL. 14304/2026 44. + CM(M) 476/2026 & CM APPL. 14306/2026 45. + CM(M) 477/2026 & CM APPL. 14308/2026 DR. SL GROVER & ANR. .....RespondentsCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 04.05.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, at this stage, the presentpetitions have become infructuous. It is, accordingly, prayed that the present petitions be disposed of as withdrawn.3. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned counsel for thepetitioner, the present petitions are disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed ofRAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, JMAY 4, 2026/nd/abk...
M/S Yashika Growth Pvt Ltd vs M/S Cogent Transware Solutions Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 414/2026 M/S YASHIKA GROWTH PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dheeraj Kumar Nag, Advocate.versusM/S COGENT TRANSWARE SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.....Respondent Through: Mr. Hitesh Chopra, Mr. Rahul Kumar and Mr. Parth Sinha, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 04.05.20261. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of theArbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes which have arisen between the parties under a Manpower Services Agreement dated 23.01.2021 (hereinafter referred to as the Agreement).2. It is the case of the Petitioner that as per the said Agreement, theRespondents took the services of the Petitioner for providing manpower at different locations in the State of U.P. and Haryana.3. It is stated that a sum of Rs.16,35,978/- was due and pending as onFebruary, 2025. A legal notice was issued by the Petitione...
Dolly vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 956/2026 DOLLY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Inderpal Khokhar, Ms. Neha and Ms. Simran Khokar, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP with SI Nitin and SI Sudhir Rathi, PS Burari. Ms. Bahuli Sharma, (through videoconferencing) and Ms. Susan Maria Mathew, Advocates for Complainant.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 04.05.20261. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 370/2019 ofPolice Station Burari for offence under Section 363/366/370 IPC and Section 4/6 of POCSO Act.2. Broadly speaking, according to prosecution case, theaccused/applicant and two others pushed the prosecutrix, a minor girl, into flesh trade. Initially, all three of them absconded, which led to delay in commencement of trial. Now, all three of them are in jail.3. After addressing partly, learned counsel for ac...
- ‹ Prev
- 431
- 432
- 433
- 434
- 435
- 437
- 438
- 439
- 440
- 441
- Next ›
- Last »