Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lakshay Dipchandani vs Gurvinder Singh Alag
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3433/2026, CRL.M.A. 13887/2026-Exp., CRL.M.A. LAKSHAY DIPCHANDANI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Yogesh Swaroop, Ms. Shivangi Singh, Advs.versusGURVINDER SINGH ALAG .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 04.05.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks setting aside of the orders dated 17.01.2026 and 20.03.2026 passed by the learned JMFC (NI Act)-07/SED, Saket Courts, New Delhi in CC No.9294/2021(learned Trial Court), whereby his right to lead complainant evidence was closed and application under Section 311 CrPC was dismissed respectively.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, while passing theimpugned orders, the learned Trial Court has failed to consider that the petitioner was suffering from some genuine health issue. He submits that the petitioner had even placed on record medical p...
M/S Neometrix Defence Ltd vs Assistant Chief of Air Staff (Procurement ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5969/2026 and CM APPL. 29311/2026 Date of decision: 04.05.2026 IN THE MATTER OF: M/S NEOMETRIX DEFENCE LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amarish Chandra Tiwari, Advocate.versusASSISTANT CHIEF OF AIR STAFF (PROCUREMENT) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Rohan Jaitley CGSC, Mr.Akshay Sharma, Mr.Dev Pratap Shahi, Mr.Varun Pratap Singh,Mr.Yogya Bhatia, Advocates along with Group Capt.Gango Upadhyay, Wing CDR G.K.SharmaCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVJUDGEMENTPURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 29312/2026 (for exemption)1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 5969/2026 and CM APPL. 29311/20261. The instant petition is for the following reliefs:-i. Quash and set aside the impugned termination order dated 13.04.2026 issued by Respondent No. 2; ii. In the alternative and without prejudice, direct the parties to refer the disputes arising o...
Deepak Babu & Ors. vs State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~118-Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3420/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13838-39/2026 DEEPAK BABU & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashwani Saxena, Ms. Anjali Singh, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP. SI Anju, PS- SJ Enclave. Ms. Seema Malhotra, Advocate for R-2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 04.05.20261. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 528 ofthe Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]), seeking quashing of FIR No. 147/2022 dated 29.03.2022, registered at Police Station Safdarjung Enclave, Delhi, under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], alongwith all proceedings arising therefrom, on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes.2. Issue notice. Mr. Hitesh Vali, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice on behalf of...
Navdeep vs the State of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3376/2026 NAVDEEP .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Swastik Singh, Adv.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar APP for State with Mr. Dinesh Kr., Ms. Upasna Bakshi and Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 04.05.2026 CRL.M.A. 13650/2026 (Exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The present application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 3376/20263. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner inter alia seeks setting aside of the order dated 02.02.2026 passed by the learned Additional Session Judge-05, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi in Criminal Appeal No.2270/2024 (learned Sessions Court) as also seeks direction to the learned CMM (SW) Dwarka Courts, Delhi (Trial Court) to decide the petitioners protest petition on merit.4. Issue notice.5. Learned APP for the State accepts not...
Savita Goel vs Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6055/2026 & CM APPL. 29839/2026 SAVITA GOEL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Krishan Maggu, Mr. Vikas Sareen, Ms. Oshin Maggu & Mr. Aryan Nagpal, Advs.versusREGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gaganmeet Singh Sachdeva alongwith Mr. Harshpreet Singh Chadha and Mr. Hridyesh Khanna, Advs. for DDA. Mr. Shashi Pratap Singh, Ms. Laqshyaa Saluja & Ms. Anamika Tyagi, Advs. for RCS.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 04.05.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 29839/2026 (for exemption)2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 6055/20263. The Petitioner in the present petition claims to be entitled tomembership of the New Saraswati Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. (hereinafter, the society) on the ground of certain Powers of Attorney (hereinafter, PoAs) which have been executed in respect of me...
Sandeep Kumar Dubey vs Union of India Ministry of Home Affairs and Anr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6029/2026 and CM APPL. 29698/2026 SANDEEP KUMAR DUBEY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anand Mishra, Ms. Ayushi Rajput, Ms. Pranjal Jain and Mr. Shubham Kumar Bhagat, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pritish Agarwal, DC Anand Kumar, Insp Sanjay Kumar, SI Atul Sen and CT Sandeep Kumar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 04.05.20261. The appointment of the Petitioner has been kept in abeyance, as his case has been referred to the Standing Screening Committee to assess his suitability in view of the pendency of an FIR.2. The limited prayer in the present Writ Petition is to direct the Standing Screening Committee to decide the case of the Petitioner in a time-bound manner.3. Learned counsel representing the Respondent submits that the Standing Screening Committee will take a decision within a period of one (01) month from today.4....
Irfan Khan & Ors. vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3391/2026, CRL.M.A. 13685/2026-Exp. IRFAN KHAN & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohsin Sarwar and Mr. Javed Khan, Advs. with petitioners in personversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for State with Mr. Dinesh Kr., Ms. Upasna Bakshi and Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advs. with SI Pradeep Malik, PS: Jamia Nagar. R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 04.05.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.256/2024 dated 23.07.2024 registered at PS: Jamia Nagar, Delhi under Sections 498A/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Settlement Deed dated 23.08.2025 [Annexure B] arrived between the petitioner no.1 and the respondent no.2, which is accompanied by their respective proofs of identity.2. Issue notic...
Aman & Anr. vs State of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3399/2026 AMAN & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ankit Negi and Mr. Naveen Gaur, AdvocatesversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for the State with SI Vikas YadavCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 04.05.20261. Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 143/2026 of PS Fatehpur Beri for offence under Section 115(2)/126(2)/110/3(5) BNS on the ground that injured (respondent no.2) has settled the disputes with the petitioners.2. Broadly speaking, it is a case of road rage in which the petitioners did not join investigation despite rejection of their application for anticipatory bail.3. After addressing partly, learned counsel for petitioners, on instructions of his clients present in courtroom, seeks permission to withdraw this petition.4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. GIRISH KATHPALIA, J MAY 4, 2026 rsThis is a digitally signed order. The auth...
Smt. Veerwati vs Bses Yamuna Power Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 777/2026 SMT. VEERWATI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naveen, Mr. Abhishek Sharma and Mr. Gagandeep Kulyana, Advs.versusBSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Kumar Srivastava, Mr. Moksh Arora and Mr. Santosh Ramdurg, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTASACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL.29423/2026 (Exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CONT.CAS(C) 777/20263. After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner confines therelief sought to a limited prayer that a representation, which the petitioner proposes to submit to BSES objecting to the grant of an electricity connection in respect of the premises in question, be considered and decided expeditiously.4. Let the said representation, as and when filed, be examined by the BSES and be disposed of within a period of two weeks from receipt thereof.5. The pe...
Jaipal vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6027/2026, CM APPL. 29696/2026 and CM APPL. JAIPAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Lohchub and Mr. Puran Singh, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikash Kumar Sharma, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 04.05.20261. Through the present Writ Petition, the Petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 21.04.2026, whereby the Petitioner has been repatriated to his parent organisation, namely, the Border Security Force (BSF).2. The Petitioner was deputed to the National Disaster ResponseForce (NDRF) on 16.08.2022. He was sent for training; however, he had to leave the same in-between on account of medical issues in his family. Thereafter, the authorities at the NDRF decided to repatriate the Petitioner.3. Learned counsel representing the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner has been repatriated prematurely and now has to report to his Unit, whi...
- ‹ Prev
- 440
- 441
- 442
- 443
- 444
- 446
- 447
- 448
- 449
- 450
- Next ›
- Last »