Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Geetika vs Dsssb & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on : 23.03.2026Judgment delivered on : 04.05.2026+ W.P.(C) 3615/2026 and CM APPL. 17528/2026GEETIKA .....PetitionerversusDSSSB & ANR. .....RespondentsAdvocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. K. C. Mittal and Mr. Keshav Poonia, Adv.For the Respondents : Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, SC along with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs. Mr. Saurabh Seth, SC along with Mr. Kabir Dev, Adv. forR-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJUDGMENTAMIT MAHAJAN, J.KAUR W.P.(C) 3615/2026 Page 1 of 91. The present Petition is filed assailing order dated 19.01.2026(hereinafter impugned order) passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter Tribunal) in O.A. No. 1763/2021, whereby the Original Application filed by the Petitioner was dismissed.2. Succinctly stated, the Petitioner participated in...
Nishant & Anr. vs Abhay Singh & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 501/2026 & I.A. 7841/2026 (Ex. From filing typed/certified copy of the statement of R-2)NISHANT & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sourabh Saini and Mr. Anil Pandey, AdvocatesversusABHAY SINGH & ANR. .....Respondents Through: NemoCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 04.05.20261. The present Petition, under Section 11 of the Arbitration andConciliation Act, 1996 [Act], seeks appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties arising out of the Agreement to Sell dated 13.01.2026 executed between the parties.2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, submits thatthe parties have entered into a Settlement Agreement dated 16.04.2026 [Settlement Agreement], which forms a part of the record, and in view of the same, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the present Petition.3. Leave, as sought for, is granted.4. Accordingly, t...
Slv Security Services Pvt Ltd vs North West Carrying Company Llp
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 04.05.2026 + ARB.P. 496/2026 SLV SECURITY SERVICES PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anupam Kishore Sinha, Mr. Pradeep K. Tiwari, Mr. Apoorv Jha and Mr. Sahitya Srivastava, Advocates.versusNORTH WEST CARRYING COMPANY LLP .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kashyap Kumar Dwivedi and Mr. Kishor Kunal, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKAR% JUDGEMENT (ORAL)1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 11(6)(a) of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, seeking the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes which are stated to have arisen inter se the parties in terms of the Service Agreement dated 18.07.20222.2. The said Agreement stipulates for a dispute resolutionmechanism, which contemplates adjudication of disputes arising out of the Agreement by way of Arbitration. The said stipulation is contained in Clause 15 of the Agree...
Rajesh Khandelwal & Anr. vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2242/2026 RAJESH KHANDELWAL & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Aakash Naval, MR. Sahanawaz, Mr. M. Khan, Mr. Abhishek Naval, Advs. with petitioners in personversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Ms. Divya Bakshi and Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Advocates IO appearance not given R-2 present in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 04.05.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. Sections 376/420/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (DP Act) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Settlement Deed dated 01.03.2026 [Annexure P3] arrived between the petitioners and the respondent no.2, which is accompanied by their respective proofs of identity.2. ...
Satya Parkash and Brothers Private Limited vs Public Works Department
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 597/2026 & I.A. 9233/2026SATYA PARKASH AND BROTHERS PRIVATE LIMITED.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aseem Mehrotra and Ms. Deeksha Mehrotra, Advs.versusPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shiven Varma, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 04.05.20261. The present petition is filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration andConciliation Act, 1996 (for short the Act) for appointment of an arbitrator.2. The brief facts are that the petitioner was the successful bidder in thetender invited by the respondent for Strengthening of SA Road from Outer Ring Road to MB Road T-Point (RD-0 to RD 5460) and was awarded the work contract by the respondent vide work order dated 04.03.2017. Disputes arose between the parties to the lis. The petitioner invoked the dispute resolution mechanism under Clause 25 of the General Conditions of Contract and an arbitrator was appointed, who passed an award dat...
Saniya & Anr. vs the State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 996/2026 SANIYA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: NoneversusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for the State with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar and Ms. Amisha Gupta, Advs. ASI-Dashruth, PS: KhyalaCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 04.05.20261. There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioners even today.Same was the position on the last date of hearing as well.2. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing thepresent petition.3. As such, the present petition is dismissed in default for non-appearance and non-prosecution.SAURABH BANERJEE, JMAY 4, 2026/AbThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2026 at 13:17:08...
M/S Eurotoys Pvt Ltd vs M/S Toy Zone
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 4th May, 2026 Uploaded on: 7th May, 2026+ RFA(COMM) 55/2023 & CM APPL. 22037/2023 M/S EUROTOYS PVT LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Paras Verma, Authorized RepresentativeversusM/S TOY ZONE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rovin Kumar, Adv.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGHJUSTICE MADHU JAINPrathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present appeal has been filed seeking setting aside of the judgement& Decree dated 21st January, 2023 passed by the District Judge (Commercial Court), East District, Karkardooma Courts in CS (COMM) No. 66 of 2021 titled Eurotoys Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S. TOY ZONE.3. The background of this case is that a suit for recovery of sum ofRs.3,55,277.90/- was filed by the Plaintiff/Appellant before the District Judge (Commercial Court), Karkardooma Court, Delhi.4. The case of the Plaintiff that led to the institution of the suit is that thePlaintiff/Appe...
Uchit Expressways Pvt Ltd vs National Highways Authority of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 282/2026 UCHIT EXPRESSWAYS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Renu Gupta, Mr. Hardik Malik & Ms. Pratiksha Jalan, Advs.versusNATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Prem Prakash, Mr. Parivesh Singh & Mr. Sparsh Gola, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 04.05.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended by from 01.04.2026 to 01.10.2026 as prayed for.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JMAY 4, 2026ChThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal...
Deepanshu @ Fun vs State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1248/2026 DEEPANSHU @ FUN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Mr. Sanju Gupta, Mr. Lalit Kumar Sharma, Mr. Lakshay Tyagi, Mr. Akshay Tyagi, Mr.Arjun Upadhyaya, Mr. Manav Gupta, Advocates.versusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with Insp. Sandeep and SI Udit, P.S. Ranhola.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 04.05.2026CRL.M.A. 9807/2026Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.BAIL APPLN. 1248/20261. Applicant seeks regular bail in FIR No. 70/2020 dated 27.01.2020registered at P.S. Ranhola for commission of offences under Section 307 IPC and Sections 25/27/54/59 of Arms Act, 1959.2. FIR in question was registered on 27.01.2020 when police learnt thatone Sahil Lakra (deceased herein) had been admitted in Balaji Action Medical Institute with alleged history of gunshot injury. During investigation, statement of eye-witness...
Tracx Logis India Private Limited vs Fixfeels Technologies Private Lim ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 04.05.2026 + ARB.P. 656/2026 TRACX LOGIS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Mehandru, Ms. Charu Tandon, Mr. Rohit Singh, Mr. Raghav Tandon, Mr. Nikhil Kharaliya and Mr. Neeraj Srivastava, AdvocatesversusFIXFEELS TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ankit Chaturvedi, Mr. Sagar Chauhan, Mr. Sumeet Singh and Ms. Suvarna Chaturvedi, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKAR% JUDGEMENT (ORAL)1. The present Petition, filed under Section 11 of the Arbitrationand Conciliation Act, 1996 [Act], seeks the appointment of an Arbitrator for the purpose of resolution of disputes inter se the parties arising out of the Services Management Solutions Agreement dated 06.04.2023 [Agreement], and under which the Dispute Resolution Clause is set out at Clause 19, which reads as under: 19. Dispute Resolution: All disputes arising out of or in relation to this Agreement, i...
- ‹ Prev
- 433
- 434
- 435
- 436
- 437
- 439
- 440
- 441
- 442
- 443
- Next ›
- Last »