Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tayyab Ali vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 4th May, 2026 Uploaded on: 7th May, 2026 + W.P.(C) 4288/2026 & CM APPL. 20945/2026, CM APPL. TAYYAB ALI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Ranu Purohit (DHCLSC), Mr. Yashas R.K., Ms. Niharika Singh Advs.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Puja S. Kalra, SC with Mr. Virendra Singh, Adv. for MCDCORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGHJUSTICE MADHU JAINPrathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner-Mr. Tayyab Aliunder Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking directions to the Respondents to identify and demarcate the specific street vending site of the Petitioner and to issue a revised Certificate of Vending (hereinafter, CoV) to the Petitioner.3. The case of the Petitioner is that he is a person with 50% locomotordisability. In this regard the disability certificate of the Pe...
M/S Central Court Hotel vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4469/2024 & CM APPL. 18326/2024 M/S CENTRAL COURT HOTEL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Subhash C. Jindal, AdvocateversusNEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharma and Ms. Shilpa Ohri, Addl. Standing counsel for NDMC with Mr. Anand Kumar Sharma, AdvocateCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 04.05.20261. The present petition has been filed seeking the following relief:-In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the Petitioners respectfully pray that your Lordship may be graciously pleased to quash the demand notice dated 06.11.2023 issued under Section 100(1) of NDMC Act 1994 against the premises of Petitioners (Annexure P/25) and further direct the Respondents to consider representations dated 13.10.2022, 31.12.2022, 03.04.2023 and 30.11.2023 of the Petitioners (Annexure P/17, P/18, P/24 & P/26 ) for Rectification submitted by them so that they are able to dep...
Parveen Kapoor and Ors. vs Omaxe Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 20.12.2025Judgment pronounced on: 04.05.2026Judgment uploaded on: As per digital signature~+ FAO (OS) (COMM) 50/2024 & CM APPL. 15862/2024PARVEEN KAPOOR & OTHERS ..... AppellantsversusOMAXE LIMITED ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this caseFor the Appellants : Ms. Kaadambari Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shraddha Sharma and Mr.Praveen Kapoor AdvocatesFor the Respondent : Mr. Ramesh Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mukti Bodh, Mr. Subhasish Panda, Ms. Mala Dwivedi, Ms. Nanya Hage, Mr. Pawan Agarwal, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARJUDGMENTV. KAMESWAR RAO , J.1. This appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and ConciliationAct, 1996 (the Act, hereinafter) has been filed with the following prayers: (a) Set aside the Impugned Judgment dated 12.12.2023 passed by the Hon'ble Court of Delhi in the case titled Omaxe Ltd. v. Praveen Kapoor &a...
Vinod Ghosh vs the State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1317/2026VINOD GHOSH .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Ritu Munjal, Advocate.versusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for the State. SI Rohan, P.S.: Sagarpur.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 04.05.2026CRL.M.A. 13700/2026By way of the present application filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the applicant/petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition since charges have been framed, with liberty to file afresh for the same relief before the learned trial court. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by affidavit, the application is allowed. The application is disposed-of.CRL.M.A. 13701/2026Since the present application seeks the same relief as CRL.M.A. No. present application is infructuous; and disposed-of as such.BAIL APPLN. 1317/2026 Page 1 of 2BAIL APPLN. 1317/2026In view of the order passed ab...
Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited vs Rahul Lohiya & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ARB.P. 599/2026 KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dheeraj Kumar Nag, Adv.versusRAHUL LOHIYA & ANR. .....Respondents Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJANORDER% 04.05.20261. The present petition has been filed under Section 11(6) of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, the Act) seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties arising out of a Loan Agreement dated 30.04.2024. The Agreement provides for resolution of disputes by Arbitration. Clause 33 of the agreement is an arbitration clause.2. The disputes having arisen between the parties, the petitioner invokedthe arbitration by giving a notice dated 29.12.2025, in terms of Section 21 of the Act, which did not elicit any response. Thus, the petitioner was constrained to file the present petition under Section 11 of the Act.3. Notice in the present petition was issued vi...
Ms Anuradha Bhardwaj & Anr. vs Ms Meenakshi Sharma & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 4th May, 2026. Uploaded on: 7th May, 2026. + CONT. APP.(C) 9/2026 & CM APPL. 25630/2026, CM APPL. MS ANURADHA BHARDWAJ & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Abhijit Mishra , Ms. Payal Bahl , Mr. Vikhyat Gupta, Advs.versusMS MEENAKSHI SHARMA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Appearance not given.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present appeal has been filed by the Appellants under Section 19(1)of the Contempt Courts Act, 1971 assailing the impugned order dated 12th March, 2026 passed by the ld. Single Judge in CONT.CAS(C) 1411/2025.3. Vide the impugned order, the ld. Single Judge has impleaded theAppellants in CONT.CAS(C) 1411/2025.4. Ld. Counsel for the Appellants submits that the Appellants areaggrieved by the fact that the Appellants have been impleaded in CONT.CAS(C) 1411/2025 and have been d...
Mukesh Kumar vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 06.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 04.05.2026+ W.P.(C) 4366/2026 and CM APPL. 21249/2026MUKESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shivanshu Bhardwaj, AdvversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Through: Mr. Suhail Malik, SPC with Mr. Aqib Zaman, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJUDGMENTAMIT MAHAJAN, J.1. Through the present writ petition, the Petitioner has sought thefollowing prayers:a. To quash and set aside the Impugned Order dated 25.02.2026; and/ orb. Issue a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner back into service with continuity of service, full consequential benefits and arrears of pay and allowances, treating the entire period of suspension and alleged absence as duty for all purposes; and/ orSigning Date:04.05.2026 Page 1 of 13c. Direct the Respondents to release subsistence allowance and other admissibl...
Vinay Kumar Sharma vs Ruby Newton
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1080/2026 VINAY KUMAR SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitesh Gupta, Advocate.versusRUBY NEWTON .....Respondent Through: Ms. Deeksha Sharma, Advocate.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 04.05.2026 CRL.M.A. 13704/2026 (for early hearing) The petitioner has filed this application for early hearing of the captioned petition on the ground of settlement between the parties. The parties are both present and are represented by counsel. With their consent, the application is allowed and the petition is taken up on Board.W.P.(CRL) 1080/20261. By way of the present petition under Article 226 of theConstitution, the petitioner assails the order dated 20.02.2025, whereby the maintainability of a complaint filed by the respondent under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, was upheld by the learned MagistratesW.P.(CRL) 1080/2026 Page 1 of 3Court, as well as the order dated 14.03.2026, whereby the learnedSessions Court dismis...
Saral Patel vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4707/2026 and CM APPL. 23023/2026 SARAL PATEL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rishav Ranjan, Mr. Ajay Chhikara, Mr. Aman Prasad, Mr. Arpit Malviya, Ms. Ananya Y, Mr. Naman Kumar, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....RespondentsThrough: Mr Mahendra V. Vikram Singh , SPC with Mr Avnish Singh , Advocate for R-1, 2 and 3/ UOI. SI Mahesh Kumar, IFSO Special Cell (Investigating Authority Delhi Police)CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 04.05.20261. It is submitted by learned counsel for the respondents that thepetitioners Facebook Account has been restored.2. Accordingly, since the Account of the petitioner stands restored, thepetition, along with pending application, stands disposed of.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MAY 4, 2026 aksThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order ...
M/S Jps Steels Pvt Ltd vs Income Tax Officer Ward 13(3) & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5564/2026 M/S JPS STEELS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kanishk Raj, Adv.versusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 13(3) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, SSC, Mr. Shivendra Singh and Mr. Yojit Pareek, JSCs and Mr. Surya Jindal, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 04.05.20261. The petitioner has approached this Court with the grievance that inspite of the fact that the petitioner has filed an appeal against the assessmentorder dated 27.05.2025. On 19.06.2023, the respondents have recovered theamount from the petitioners refund (on 29.01.2024).2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondents haverecovered about 50% of the total demand, though they could not have recovered beyond 20% in view of the circular dated 29.02.2016 (amended on 31.07.2017) issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT).3. Mr. Gaurav Gupta, lea...
- ‹ Prev
- 434
- 435
- 436
- 437
- 438
- 440
- 441
- 442
- 443
- 444
- Next ›
- Last »