Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Taruna Sharma vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5996/2026 and CM APPL. 29406/2026 TARUNA SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Adv.[Appearance not given]versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vivek Sharma, SPC along with Mr. Rudra Paliwal, GP. Mr. Vinod Sawant, Law Officer, Mr. Ajay Pal, AC-Law, Insp Athurv And Mr. Ramniwas Yadav CRPF.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 04.05.20261. Learned counsel representing the Petitioner, after arguing for some time and upon realizing that the Bench is not inclined to grant relief, prays to withdraw the present Writ Petition.2. Ordered accordingly.ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.AMIT MAHAJAN, J.MAY 04, 2026 s.godara/ad This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 12:54:36...
Sunil Chaturvedi vs Urmila Devi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 446/2026 SUNIL CHATURVEDI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate.versusURMILA DEVI .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 04.05.2026 CM APPL. 29429/2026 (Seeking Exemption)1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The Application stands disposed of. RFA 446/20263. Regular First Appeal under Section 96 CPC has been filed on behalfof the Defendant/Appellant challenging the impugned Order and Decree dated 16.01.2026, whereby the Decree of Possession has been passed against the Appellant, under Order XII Rule 6 CPC.4. The Plaintiff/Respondent had filed a Suit for Recovery of Possession, Arrears of Rent, Damages/Mesne Profit, Permanent and Mandatory Injunction against the Defendant/Appellant.5. The brief facts as stated in the Plaint are that thePlaintiff/Respondent is the landlord/owner of property bearing No.K-89/1, West Ghonda, Delhi, admeasuring 175 sq. yards. who had let out the Suit...
Insp/Exe Ranbir Singh & Anr. vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5979/2026 INSP/EXE RANBIR SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Counsel for the Petitioners (Appearance not given).versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Premtosh K. Mishra, CGSC along with Mr. Shrey Sharma, Mr. Anubhav Upadhyay and Mr. Arpit Bamal, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 04.05.20261. Through the present petition, the Petitioners seek re-fixation oftheir pay with effect from the date of their promotion as Sub- Inspector/ Executive (SI/Exe) through Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (LDCE) as per the order dated 04.11.2006 along with consequential benefits with arrears of pay with 9% interest.2. In effect, it is the case of the Petitioners that their case issquarely covered by the judgment of a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Harjinder Singh and Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. : W.P.(C) constitutes a mode of promotion and...
Jatinder Randhawa vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1407/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13529/2026 JATINDER RANDHAWA .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Alok Bhachawat and Mr.Manish Chaurasiya, Advs. along with petitioner present in person.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl) for the State with Ms.Priyam Agarwal & Mr.Aryan Sachdeva, Advs. along with ASI Pawan Kumar, PS Paschim Vihar East.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 04.05.20261. We are happy to learn that the parties have amicably settled their disputes before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre and have also executed a Settlement Agreement dated 02.05.2026.2. In view of the above, the petition, along with the pending application, is disposed of. NAVIN CHAWLA, J RAVINDER DUDEJA, J MAY 4, 2026/rv/asThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Or...
Raja Ram Prasad vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5972/2026, CM APPL. 29319/2026, CM APPL. RAJA RAM PRASAD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shiv Upadhyaya, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Neeraj Dubey, SPC with Mr. Shubham Kumar, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 04.05.20261. The present Petition has been filed by the Petitioner inter aliaseeking the following prayers: a. Pass the Writ in form of mandamus thereby directing the Respondent no 1 to quash or set aside the impugned order bearing P.S. V 15014(01) NDFC/03-(Major/Anu/RRP/13-2536 dated b. Pass the Writ in form of mandamus thereby directing the Respondent no 1 to restore the Grade pay of the Petitioner from Rs 8,880/- to Rs 9,220/- and to further pay the deducted arrears of 4 years of unjust deduction to the Petitioner in interest of justice.2. A perusal of the record reflects that the present Petition hasbeen filed after a period of mo...
Deepak Kumar vs the State Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3362/2026 DEEPAK KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in-person.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State. SI Devender Singh, P.S.: Jyoti Nagar. Complainant in-person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 04.05.2026 CRL.M.A. 13626/2026 (condonation of delay of 20 days in re-filing) By way of the present application filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks condonation of 20 days delay in re-filing the petition.2. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed.3. Delay in re-filing the petition is condoned.4. The application is allowed and disposed-of. CRL.M.C. 3362/20265. By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of BNSS, the petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 79/2019 dated 12.03.2019 CRL.M.C. 3362/202...
Rahul Sharma vs the State Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi Through S.H.O. & An ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1432/2026 RAHUL SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal, Ms. Nidhi Dalal, Mr. Alok Kumar, Ms. Rachana Dalal and Mr. Karan Mann, AdvocatesversusTHE STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI THROUGH S.H.O. & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) for State/R-1 SI Mohit Singh, PS BurariCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 04.05.20261. Mr. N.S. Dalal, learned counsel for petitioner submits that he has, now,been informed by the investigating officer, who is present in Court that an application seeking monitoring of the investigation has already been filed by the petitioner before the learned Trial Court. He submits that such important aspect was never apprised to him and, therefore, he wishes to withdraw the present petition.2. Present petition is accordingly disposed of, as not pressed. MANOJ JAIN, J MAY 4, 2026/dr/syThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be r...
Bhagwat Singh Rawat vs the State Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 + W.P.(C) 5980/2026 BHAGWAT SINGH RAWAT .....Petitioner Through: Md. Niyazuddin, Adv.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Sujata Kashyap, Adv. for R-3 (through v/c)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTASACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL.29333/2026 (Exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 5980/20263. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 states andundertakes, on instructions, that the gratuity amounting to Rs.3,68,000/- (inclusive of interest) shall be released to the petitioner immediately upon the petitioner approaching the said respondent in this regard.4. It is agreed by learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent no.3 that the said amount would be in full and final settlement of the pending claims of the petitioner towards gratuity.5. The present petition is disposed of taki...
Shilpika Grover vs Sanju Grover & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1021/2026, CM APPL. 29837/2026 & CM APPL. 29838/2026 SHILPIKA GROVER .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anupam Srivastva, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ritesh Kumar & Mr. Dheerendra Singh Bisht, Advs.versusSANJU GROVER & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anjana P., Sr. Adv. with Mr. Naman Jain, Mr. Niraj Dubey & Mr. Pradum Kumar, Advs. for R-5. Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, CGSC with Mr. Muhammad Aamir Khan & Mr. Syed Abdur Rahman, Advs. for R-33.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 04.05.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks the leave of this Court to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned Trial Court.3. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned Counsel for thepetitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as sought, in accordance with law...
Rajveer vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1693/2026, CRL.M.As. 13655/2026, 13656/2026 RAJVEER .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mutiur Rehman, Advocate.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, AP SI Lalit Mohan, PS DBG Road.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 04.05.20261. By way of the present application under Section 483 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS], the applicant seeks regular bail in connection with FIR No. 160/2024 dated 08.04.2024, registered at Police Station D.G.B. Road, Central District, Delhi, for offences punishable under Sections 324 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC].2. The applicant had earlier preferred an application for regular bail,being BAIL APPLN. 4430/2024, which was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 02.04.2025, with the following observations: 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the present application with liberty to file ...
- ‹ Prev
- 441
- 442
- 443
- 444
- 445
- 447
- 448
- 449
- 450
- 451
- Next ›
- Last »