Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
IC-74753F Lt Col Manali Shrivastava vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 30.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 02.05.2026+ W.P.(C) 16316/2025 & CM APPL. 66752/2025 IC-74753F LT COL MANALI SHRIVASTAVA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akshay Bhandari, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Mahapatra, Adv, CGSC, Ms. Mrinmayee Sahu, Mr. Tribhuvan, Mr. Abhimanyu & Ms. Anushka Sarraf, Advs with Lt Col Tarun Pillai, Maj Birinder, Maj Anish Murlidhar for R-1 to R-4. Mr. S.S. Pandey & Mr. Roshan Kumar, Advs. for R-5.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJUDGMENTAMIT MAHAJAN, J.1. By the present writ petition, the Petitioner seeks issuance of awrit in the nature of mandamus seeking quashing of the Order No. 391654/PO/MS-13 dated 18.09.2025 whereby the Petitioner was posted out of her current unit thereby discontinuing her spouse coordinated posting. Signed By:DEEPANSHU W.P.(C) 16316/2025 Page 1 of 72. Succinctly ...
Dr. N.Emayavaramban vs Uoi & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 22955/2005, CM APPL. 629/2006 (for impleadment) CM APPL. 545/2007 (directions) DR. N.EMAYAVARAMBAN .....Petitioner Through: NoneversusUOI & ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yashvardhan, Advocate and Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 02.05.20261. Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has beenfiled on behalf of the Petitioner for issuance of appropriate Writ for quashing the Advertisement dated 08.07.2005, issued by the Respondent No. 1, insofar as, it prescribed a scale of Rs.18,500-23,900/- under the IDA pattern and the interview that has since been held on the basis thereof, or the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to the Respondent No. 1, to call the Petitioner for the interview for selection as Chairman-cum-Managing Director of the Respondent No. 2-Corporation.2. The Writ Petition had been filed in November, 2005 in order tochallenge the Advertisemen...
K.Vijay Kumar & 2 Others vs Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5558/2006 K.VIJAY KUMAR & OTHERS .....PetitionersversusBHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD. .....RespondentCORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 02.05.20261. None appears on behalf of the parties.2. Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India had beenfiled on behalf of the Petitioners for Notification of the Advertisement published in Employment News dated 18-24 March, 2006 as illegal, null and void and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14, 16 and 371-D of the Constitution of India and to issue appropriate directions.3. The Case of the Petitioners are that they are unemployed DiplomaHolders in Mechanical Engineering, who were registered with the local District Employment Exchange at Sangareddy, Medak District, Andhra Pradesh, which is covered by Zone vi of the schedule set out in the Presidential Order of 1975. The Respondent/Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. is a premier engineering org...
Deepak Kumar & Ors. vs Border Security Force & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 30.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 02.05.2026+ W.P.(C) 17736/2025 & CM APPL. 73299/2025 DEEPAK KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Joby P Varghese, Ms. Rashi and Mr. Aby P Varghese, Advs.versusBORDER SECURITY FORCE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikram Singh Dalal, Senior Panel Counsel alongwith Mr. Pankaj Kumar, and Mr. Satwik Mitra, Advs. + W.P.(C) 3642/2026 & CM APPL. 17769/2026 DEEPAK KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Joby P Varghese, Ms. Rashi and Mr. Aby P Varghese, Advs.versusBORDER SECURITY FORCE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, CGSC with Ms. Nasreen Khatoon, G.P for UOI with Mr. Muhammad Aamir Khan and Mr. Syed Abdur Rahman, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJUDGMENTAMIT MAHAJAN, J.18:54:50 W.P.(C) 17736/2025 & W.P.(C) 3642/2026 Page 1 of 121. By the present writ petitions, the Petit...
Akhilesh @ Guru vs State
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 1597/2013 AKHILESH @ GURU .....Appellant Through: Mr. Avneesh Saran, Adv (through VC) with Mr. Daljeet Singh, proxy counsel.versusSTATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for the State along with Mr. Firoz Alam, Mr. Mohd Asif, Advs with SI Puran Singh, PS Dabri.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAVORDER% 02.05.20261. Hybrid Mode.2. None responsible is coming forward on behalf of the Appellant and Appellant is not traceable on the given address.3. The erstwhile counsel / counsel had appeared on 15.12.2025 stated that he is not in touch with the Appellant.4. Nominal Roll received dated 11.12.2025 reveals that the Appellant has completed sentence and paid the fine and has been released from jail.5. In such circumstances, there appears no reason to continue with the appeal, which in these circumstances becomes infructuous as such the same stands disposed of accordingly. VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J MAY 2, 2026/hk...