Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ikechukwu Chukwubuikem Stanley vs.narcotics Control Bureau
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h August, 2018 Decided on:20. h August, 2018 BAIL APPLN. 2343/2017 IKECHUKWU CHUKWUBUIKEM STANLEY Represented by: Mr.Vikas Gautam, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus Represented by: Mr.P.C.Aggarwal, Advocate ..... Respondent NARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU BAIL APPLN. 503/2018 ANAND KUMAR THAKUR ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.K.G.Sharma and Mr.R.K.Goel, Advocates versus NAROTIC CONTROL BUREAU CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA Represented by: Mr.P.C.Aggarwal, Advocate ..... Respondent 1. By these two petitions, the petitioners seek bail in complaint case No.SC/2titled as NCB Vs. Ikechukwu Chukwubuikem Stanley & Ors. pending in the Court of Special Judge, NDPS Act, at Patiala House.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner Ikechukwu Chukwubuikem Stanley states that from the facts even on the face of the prosecution case, the petitioner cannot be said to be in conscious possession of the narcotics drugs. No recovery has bee...
Mukesh Gola vs.govt. n.c.t. Of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4193/2018 Judgment delivered on:20.08.2018 MUKESH GOLA versus GOVT. N.C.T. OF DELHI & ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Keshav V.Hedge, Adv. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner(s) : For the Respondent(s): CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr.Kamal Kr.Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with SI Anuj Singh, P.S.Hazrat Nizamuddin. JUDGMENT2008.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 30265/2018 CRL.M.A. 30266/2018 Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4193/2018 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.116/2017 under Section 420 IPC at Police Station Hazrat Nizamuddin. Subject FIR emanates out of the dispute between the parties with regard to a sale transaction CRL.M.C.4193/2018 Page 1 of 3 which had taken place between the parties and petitioner had agreed to sell a property to the respondent/complainant and received a sum of Rs.2 lakhs. Subsequently the transaction...
Ravi Rai vs.medical Council of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:10. 04.2018 Judgment pronounced on:20. 08.2018 + W.P.(C) 10506/2017 RAVI RAI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Abhinav Shrivastava with Mr.Rahul Gupta, Advs. versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr.T. Singhdev, Mr.Tarun Verma, Ms. ........ RESPONDENTS Amandeep Kaur Ms.Puja Sarkar, Ms. Michelle Biakhthans Sanghi and Mr.Abhijit Chakravarty, Advs. for R-1. Mr.Praveen Khattar with Mr.Bapi Das, Advs. for R-2 along with Mr.L.D.S. Uppal, Assistant Secretary, DMC. Mr.Saurabh Kirpal with Mr.Mansimran Singh, Adv. for R-3. + W.P.(C) 10625/2017 & CM APP Nos.43513-43514/2017 RAVI RAI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Abhinav Shrivastava with Mr.Rahul Gupta, Advs. versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr.T. Singhdev, Mr.Tarun Verma, Ms, ........ RESPONDENTS Amandeep Kaur Ms.Puja Sarkar, Ms. Michelle Biakhthans Sanghi and Mr.Abhijit Chakravarty, Advs, for R-1. Mr.Praveen Khattar with Mr.Bapi Das, Advs. for R-2 along w...
M/S. Faith Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. Vs.m/s Simbhaoli Sugars Ltd. & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~OS-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:20. 08.2018 + CS(COMM) 280/2017 M/S. FAITH MERCANTILE PVT. LTD. Through Mr. Rishabh Gulati, Adv. ..... Plaintiff versus M/S SIMBHAOLI SUGARS LTD. & ORS Through Ms.Suneha Jain, Adv. ..... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) OA No.166/2017 1. This appeal is filed on behalf of defendants No.2 and 3 for setting aside the order dated 16.11.2017 passed by the Joint Registrar dismissing the application of defendants No.2 and 3/appellants under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.2. The plaintiff has filed the present suit for recovery of Rs.5,96,83,224/-. It has been pointed out in the plaint that purchase orders were issued by the defendants and a High Sea Sales Agreement was executed between the parties in 2012. The plaintiff had supplied the goods and issued bills/invoices. Part payment on account of this has been received by the plaintiff. C Forms have been issued by the defendants confirming the recei...
Sukhmeet Singh Anand vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. h July, 2018 Decided on:20. h August, 2018 W.P.(CRL) 2230/2018 SUKHMEET SINGH ANAND ...... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.S.S.Jauhar with Mr.Deepak versus Bashta, Advocates STATE OF NCT DELHI ... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Richa Kapoor, ASC for the State. Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Saif Khan, Mr.Niraj Singh and Mr.Achutan Sreekumar, Advocates for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Aggrieved by the order dated 26th March, 2018 dismissing the application of the petitioner seeking cancellation of non-bailable warrants issued against the petitioner, petitioner prefers the present petition through his power of attorney, Manit Jauhar.2. Brief background of the case is that a complaint was filed by M/s Samsung Gulf Electronics FZE (in short Samsung) through its authorized representative Wookjoong Yoon before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate alleging that its Financial Controller S.C. Baek was found ...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi – 1 vs.at & T Global Network S ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA2922018 Date of decision:20. August, 2018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI 1 ..... Appellant Through Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Anand, Advocates for Revenue versus AT & T GLOBAL NETWORK SERVICES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sachit Jolly and Mr. Sidharth Joshi, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The present appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act, for short) in the case of AT & T Global Network Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. arises from the order dated 18.09.2017 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal, for short) deciding cross appeals, ITA Nos. 4882/Del/2013 and 4870/Del/2013 relating to the Assessment Year 2008-09.2. The impugned order holds that the draft assessment order dated 09.08.2012, passed by the Assessing Officer under Section 144C read with Section 143...
Satinder Singh Kakar vs.avneet Kaur & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
Judgment delivered on:20. 08.2018 $~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.REV.P. 258/2017 SATINDER SINGH KAKAR AVNEET KAUR & ORS. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Devinder Chaudhary with Ms. Roopsi Sabharwal, Advocates. Mr. Maninder Singh with Ms. Smriti Asmita, Advocates. JUDGMENT2008.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 21.12.2016, whereby, the application of the petitioner seeking modification of orders dated 22.05.2014 was dismissed by the Trial Court.2. By order dated 22.05.2014, the Trial Court fixed interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.26,000/- per month from the date when the application was moved before the Trial Court, i.e., on 15.07.2010.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner CRL.REV.P. 258/2017 Page 1 of 3 had never agreed to making the payment from the date...
Ecl Finance Ltd. Vs.ms. Sukhmani Bedi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~9 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"20th August, 2018 CRL. M.C. 1655/2015 & Crl.M.A. 11097/2015 ECL FINANCE LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil K. Mittal, Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Mr. Raveesh Thukral & Mr. Kshitij Mittal, Advs. versus MS. SUKHMANI BEDI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashim Vachher, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner had instituted a criminal complaint (CC No.541/2013) in the court of Metropolitan Magistrate on 03.04.2013 involving offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The respondents herein were impleaded in the said criminal complaint as third and fifth prospective accused, this in addition to M/s Cedar Infonet Private Ltd. (accused no.1), Lt. Col. H.S. Bedi (accused no.2) and Ms. Maninder Bedi (accused no.4). The allegations in the case concerned a cheque bearing No.933743 dated 28.02.2013 for Rs. 52,64,384/- which had been issued under the signatures of Lt. C...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.fakir Chand Pal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment: August 20, 2018 + MAC.APP. 173/2013 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus + MAC.APP. 300/2013 FAKIR CHAND PAL & ANR. FAKIR CHAND PAL & ORS. Through: Mr. Aditya Sharda, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Nemo Versus ..... Appellant RAJINDER SINGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth and Mr. Aditya, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The above captioned two appeals are directed against Award of 26th November, 2012 vide which compensation of 6,04,320/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum has been awarded to Claimants. In the above captioned first appeal, the Insurer seeks exoneration on the ground of lack of negligence on the part of driver of Insured vehicle and reduction of quantum of compensation granted, whereas in the above captioned second appeal, MAC. APP. 173/2013 MAC. APP. 300/2013 Page 1 of 6 enhancement of compensation is so...
M/S. Collage Estates Pvt. Ltd. Vs.blue Star Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO (OS) (COMM) 186/2018 Date of decision:20. h August, 2018 M/S. COLLAGE ESTATES PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.P. Singh and Ms. Ishita Jain, Advocates. Versus BLUE STAR LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Yashvardhan, Mr. Pradeep Chhindra, Ms. Smita Kant and Mr. Puneet Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Caveat No.746/2018 Caveator is present and will be heard. Caveat stands disposed of. C.M. No.33485/2018 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. FAO (OS) (COMM) 186/2018 FAO(OS) (COMM) No.186/2018 Page 1 of 10 M/s. Collage Estates Pvt. Ltd. has filed the present intra-Court appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (A & C Act, for short) read with Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of the High Courts Act, 2015.2. The i...