Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs.amarjit Kaur & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t August, 2018. RSA172010, CM Nos.16427/2018 & 17580/2018 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Biji Rajesh & Ms. Sneha Verma, Advs. for Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Adv. Versus AMARJIT KAUR & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Through: Mr. S.K. Bhalla, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS On the last date of hearing i.e. 4th July, 2018, the following order was 1. passed:-"1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment dated 2nd September, 2009 in RCA No.04/2009 of the Court of Sh. Virender Bhat, Additional District Judge (ADJ), Delhi allowing the appeal preferred by the respondents against the judgment and decree dated 13th March, 2009 of the Court of Sh. Vinay Singhal, JSCC- cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge, West District, Delhi of dismissal of Suit No.2463/2008 instituted on 28th January, 1992 by the predecessor of the respondents / plaintiffs...
Lord Buddha Educational Society & Anr vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
#47 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:01. 08.2018. W.P.(C) 6656/2018 LORD BUDDHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR....... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ...... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Senior Advocate with Mr. J.S. Bhasin and Mr. Nishant Shokeen, Advocates : Mr. Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. T. Singhdev, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Ms Amandeep Kaur and Ms. Biakthan Sangi Das, Advocates for MCI For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks enforcement of specific directions issued by the Honble Supreme Court of India in W.P. (C) 776/2017, titled as Lord Buddha Educational Society & Anr Vs. Union of Inda & Anr by directing the respondent No.2/Medical Council of India (for short MCI) to point out the deficiencies that exist in the petitioner institution and thereaf...
National Highway Authority of India vs.m/s Gayatri Jhansi Roadways Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) (COMM) 161/2018 Date of decision:1. t August, 2018 NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA .... Appellant Through Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shailendra Pratap Singh, Mr. Alok Singh, Mr. Nilendra Pratap Singh, Ms. Chandrika Prashad Mishra and Ms. Seema Singh, Advocates. Versus M/S GAYATRI JHANSI ROADWAYS LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Samaksh Goyal, Mr. Ram Babu, Mr. Kaushik Laik and Ms. Bani Brar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) National Highway Authority of India in this intra-Court appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (A & C Act, for short) read with Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 impugns order dated 25th May, 2018, whereby objections filed by the appellant under Section 34 of the ...
Rajinder Mehra vs.rajesh Tuli and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
$~59 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:7. h August, 2018 FAO(OS) 335/2016 RAJINDER MEHRA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Arvind Bhatt and Mr.Kuber Giri, Advocates with petitioner in person. versus RAJESH TULI AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC and for Advocate Mr.T.P. Singh, respondent/L&DO. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 05.09.2016 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court, by which an application being I.A. No.2697/2016 filed under Section 151 CPC has been rejected.2. In this case, probate of a will of late Sh.Vidya Bhushan Mehra who died on 30.09.1984 was granted on 28.01.1985. Post the grant of probate the appellant had approached the L&DO for mutation of the property. L&DO called upon the appellant/applicant Rajinder Mehra to file an affidavit of the Executor of the Will stating that he ha...
Smt. Usha Kesharwani vs.m/s Pilot Industries Ltd. & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.617/2018 + % SMT. USHA KESHARWANI1t August, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V.K. Mishra, Advocate Jain, with Ms. Monika Advocate. M/S PILOT INDUSTRIES LTD. & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.30658/2018(exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. No.30657/2018 (for condonation of delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 128 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.617/2018 Page 1 of 11 RFA No.617/2018 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 7.11.2017 by which trial court has dismissed the suit for recovery of Rs.19,22,600.35/- along with interest.4. The case of the appellant/plaintif...
Jagran Prakashan Limited vs.dhananjay Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~9 * + W.P.(C) 989/2018 with CM Nos.4165/2018 & 4167/2018 JAGRAN PRAKASHAN LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Birendra Mishra & Ms.Poonam, Proxy Counsel versus DHANANJAY KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Satyabrata Panda, Mr.M.Paikaray & Mr.Tanveer Zaki, Advocates CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER0108.2018 The petitioner, Jagran Prakashan Limited has invoked the writ % 1. jurisdiction of this Court seeking quashing/setting aside of the order dated 24th November, 2017, passed by the Deputy Labour Commissioner under the Working Journalists & Other Newspaper Employees (Condition of Service and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1955 [in short Working Journalists Act]. and consequent Recovery Certificate issued on 30th November, 2017, whereby recovery for `10,38,192/- has been ordered by the said Authority.2. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order impugned herein inter alia on the ground that in view of the decision of this Co...
Reliance Commercial Finace Ltd vs.sameer Seth and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2018
$~50 to 52 * % + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:1. t August, 2018 EFA(OS) 12/2018 & CM Nos. 27991-992/2018 RELIANCE COMMERCIAL FINACE LTD Through: Mr.Rajat Katyal, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus SAMEER SETH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Prabhsahay Kaur, Mr.Manav Gupta, and Ms.Esha Dutta, Mr.Salil Garg Advocates for respondents. EFA(OS) 13/2018 & CM Nos. 27993-994/2018 RELIANCE COMMERCIAL FINACE LTD Through: Mr.Rajat Katyal, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus SAMEER SETH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Prabhsahay Kaur, Mr.Manav Gupta, and Ms.Esha Dutta, Mr.Salil Garg Advocates for respondents. EFA(OS) 14/2018 & CM Nos.29155-29156/2018 RELIANCE COMMERCICAL FINANCE LTD Through: Mr.Rajat Katyal, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus SAMEER SETH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Prabhsahay Kaur, Mr.Manav Gupta, and Ms.Esha Dutta, Mr.Salil Garg Advocates for respondents. EFA (OS) 12/2018, 13/2018 & 14/2018, Page 1 of 10 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE...