Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dharmender @ Kale vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~3 * % + DHARMENDER @ KALE CRL.A.689/2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr.R.P.S.Yadav, Advocate with Mr.Hira Singh Rawat, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT2008.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the Judgment dated 25th May, 2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (West) in Sessions Case No.162/2017 arising from FIR No.495/2016 registered at PS Nangloi convicting the Appellant for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC, Section 25(1B)(a) and Section 27(1) of the Arms Act while acquitting him of the offence under Section 201 IPC.2. This appeal is also directed against the order on sentence of the same date whereby the Appellant was sentenced to imprisonment for life along with fine of Rs.10,000/-; and in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for a period of six months for Crl A. 689 ...
Sh Ramesh Chandra Sharma & Anr. Vs.united India Insurance Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of decision: August 20, 2018 + MAC.APP. 228/2013 JAGJEET SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Suvesh Sharma, Advocate with appellant in person Versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate + MAC.APP. 804/2014 1. SH RAMESH CHANDRA SHARMA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Nemo. Versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE LTD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned two appeals are directed against Award of 30th November, 2012 vide which compensation of `11,83,400/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum has been awarded to Claimants. In the above captioned first appeal, Owner of the insured vehicle seeks exoneration from paying the awarded compensation, whereas in the above captioned MAC.APP. 228/2013 MAC.APP. 804/2014 Page 1 of 6 second appeal, enhancement of compensation is sought by Claimants. Since these two...
Shubham Gupta vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~8, 41, 42 & 44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8522/2018 & CM No.32769/2018 SMT. SUNITA GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Varun Jain and Mr Navin Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr Sidharth Singh and Mr R. R. Rai, Advocates for UOI. Mr Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel. WITH + W.P.(C) 8468/2018 & CM No.32548/2018 SHRI PREM CHAND GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Varun Jain and Mr Navin Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr Siddharth Singh, Advocates for R-1/UOI. Mr Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel. WITH W.P.(C) 8522/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 17 + W.P.(C) 8470/2018 & CM No.32550/2018 SHUBHAM GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Varun Jain and Mr Navin Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr Siddharth Singh, Advocates for R-1/U...
Deepak Sahu vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~22 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"20th August, 2018 CRL. M.C. 2632/2016 DEEPAK SAHU STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Manu Mridul, Mr. Shalaj ........ Petitioner versus Through: Mridul & Ms. Neha Rai, Advs. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for the State with ASI Sunder Prakash CAW Cell East District. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) was filed seeking quashing of the proceedings arising out of first information report (FIR) No.221/2012 under Section 498A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) of police station Mayur Vihar on the basis of settlement reached with the second respondent (the complainant). Though the petition was filed, supported, inter alia, by an affidavit of the second respondent, upon being noticed the said party initially having appeared and sought time to respond, made submissions in person on 10.7.2017 to the effect tha...
Haradhan Bhowmik vs.the State Govt of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(CRL) 3046/2015 and Crl. M.A. No.18714/2015 (Stay) Reserved on:30. h July, 2018 Decided on:20. h August, 2018 HARADHAN BHOWMIK ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Raghav Bansal and Mr. Shashwat Bansal, Advocates. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Piyush Singhal, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Additional Standing Counsel for State with SI Manish Kumar, EOW. + W.P.(CRL) 2333/2016 and Crl. M.A. No.12196/2016 (Stay) BIJANENDU BHOWMIK ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Raghav Bansal and Mr.Shashwat Bansal, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT) DELHI& ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel for State, Mr. Chaitanya Gosain and Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Advocates with SI Manish Kumar, EOW. + W.P.(CRL) 2340/2016 and Crl. M.A. No.12214/2016 (Stay) TAPAN BHOWMIK ........ Petitioner W.P.(CRL) 3046/2015, 2333/2016 and 2340/2016 Page 1 of 11 Represented by: Mr. Raghav Bansal...
Raj Bahadur @ Bahadur Singh vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1401/2018 Judgment delivered on:20. 08.2018 RAJ BAHADUR @ BAHADUR SINGH ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Mr.Virender Kumar, Adv. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms.Neelam Sharma, APP. JUDGMENT2008.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.239/2018 under Sectionsof the IPC at Police Station Karol Bagh.2. The allegations of the complainant are that the petitioner had allured her to make her a LIC agent and thereafter on 04.04.2018 he called her for a meeting. When she got down at the metro station at Rajendra Place, the petitioner is alleged to have taken her in a car and roamed around for about an hour and a half in the vehicle. Thereafter he is alleged to have taken her to a hotel i.e. OYO Hotel, Gold Place, BAIL APPLN. 1401/2018 Page 1 of 3 Karol Bagh. She w...
Suresh Kumar Rathore & Another vs.the State, (Govt. Of n.c.t. Of Delhi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~61 & 64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4176/2018 Judgment delivered on:.20.08.2018 SURESH KUMAR RATHORE & OTHERS ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE, (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ANR....respondents + CRL.M.C. 4184/2018 SURESH KUMAR RATHORE & ANOTHER THE STATE, (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ANR..... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner(s) : For the Respondent(s): CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr.Ravinder Tyagi, Adv. Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with W/ASI Santosh, P.S.South Rohini. Mr.Manoj Sharma, Adv. for R-2. JUDGMENT2008.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 30241/2018 CRL.M.A. 30248/2018 Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C.4176/2018 & 4184/2018 Page 1 of 4 CRL.M.C. 4176/2018 & Crl.M.C.4184/2018 1.... Petitioners in Crl. M.C. 4176/2018 seek quashing of FIR No.177/2017 under Sections 323/354/354A/354B/5at Police Station South Rohini and... P...
Reliance General Insurance Ltd. Vs.smt. L. Shanti Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: August 20, 2018 MAC.APP.460/2015 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajeev M. Roy and Mr. P. Srinivasan, Advocates Versus SMT. L. SHANTI DEVI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anne Mathew, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT Impugned Award of 20th March, 2015 grants compensation of `33,40,038/- with interest @ 8% p.a. to respondent-Claimants on account of death of one Supervisor-L. Binoy Singh, aged 26 years, in a vehicular accident on 31st October, 2009.2. The factual background of this case, as noticed in the impugned Award, is as under:-"The case of the petitioners is that on 31.10.2009 when Sh. Ginkhanmug Tombing, S.N. Bijen Singh, Sh. Kalvin and deceased were going in Maruti 800 bearing No.DL8CC0083which was driven by Sh. Ginkhanmug Tombing and when they reached at Raja Garden Crossing in the meantime Hyundai i-10 car bearing registration No.DL...
Smt. Sunita Gupta vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~8, 41, 42 & 44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8522/2018 & CM No.32769/2018 SMT. SUNITA GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Varun Jain and Mr Navin Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr Sidharth Singh and Mr R. R. Rai, Advocates for UOI. Mr Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel. WITH + W.P.(C) 8468/2018 & CM No.32548/2018 SHRI PREM CHAND GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Varun Jain and Mr Navin Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr Siddharth Singh, Advocates for R-1/UOI. Mr Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel. WITH W.P.(C) 8522/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 17 + W.P.(C) 8470/2018 & CM No.32550/2018 SHUBHAM GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Varun Jain and Mr Navin Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr Siddharth Singh, Advocates for R-1/U...
Umashankar & Anr. Vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~7 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"20th August, 2018 CRL. M.C. 1452/2015 & Crl.M.A. 5348/2015 UMASHANKAR & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. L.B. Rai, Mr. Mahi Pal Singh, Mr. Muri Tawari & Ms. Shama Sharma, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS......... RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with SI Mahesh Singh, PS Pandav Nagar. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On the criminal complaint dated 16.05.2002 (complaint case 203 later CC No.3278/ new number 2434/09) of second respondent (hereinafter the complainant), directions have been given by the court of Sessions exercising revisional jurisdiction (in criminal revision 08/2014), by order dated 21.03.2015, summoning the petitioners (as accused) as a consequence of setting aside of the earlier order dated 04.06.2010 of the Metropolitan Magistrate dismissing the said complaint under Section 203 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19...