Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjeev K. Saroha & Anr. Vs.ndmc
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:-"06.07.2018. Date of Decision:-"20.08.2018 + W.P.(C) No.8578/2017 & CM APPL. Nos. 35278/2017, 46886/2017 SANJEEV K. SAROHA & ANR. ........ Petitioners NDMC Through : Mr. Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Meenakshi Midha, Mr. Kapil Midha, Mr. Narendera S. Sagwan, Mr. Bhavya, Advocates. .... Respondent Through : Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, Standing Counsel for NDMC with Mr.Aditya Vikram Singh and Ms.Vidhi Jain, Advocates. Versus CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J JUDGMENT1 The... Petitioners, owners of the freehold commercial property bearing No.F-7, Shankar Market, New Delhi, have filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India inter alia seeking quashing of the notice dated 19.09.2017, whereby the Respondent has cancelled their permission letter dated 21.05.2015 to display a building/wall wrap on the said property. The... Petitioners also seek a direction to the Respondent to per...
Shri Prem Chand Gupta vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~8, 41, 42 & 44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8522/2018 & CM No.32769/2018 SMT. SUNITA GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Varun Jain and Mr Navin Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr Sidharth Singh and Mr R. R. Rai, Advocates for UOI. Mr Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel. WITH + W.P.(C) 8468/2018 & CM No.32548/2018 SHRI PREM CHAND GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Varun Jain and Mr Navin Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr Siddharth Singh, Advocates for R-1/UOI. Mr Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel. WITH W.P.(C) 8522/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 17 + W.P.(C) 8470/2018 & CM No.32550/2018 SHUBHAM GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Varun Jain and Mr Navin Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr Siddharth Singh, Advocates for R-1/U...
C Natesan & Ors. Vs.nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~24 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"20th August, 2018 CRL. M.C. 3357/2016 & Crl.M.A. Nos. 14227-28/2016 C NATESAN & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Kuldeep Mansukhani, Adv. versus NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Gulshan Yadav, EOW. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioners have approached this Court by the petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) to seek quashing of the proceedings in the criminal case arising out of FIR No.186/1999 under Sections 406/420/120B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) of police station Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi which is pending in the Court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, South-East, New Delhi, primarily on the grounds that they had settled the dispute with the second respondent and were ready and willing to settle the dispute with the other victims of the crime alleged in the case. Though, from the documents,...
Naeem @ Sameer @ Habib vs.the State ( Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:20. 08.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1092/2018 NAEEM @ SAMEER @ HABIB versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr. S.A. Rajput, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for the State with the Investigating Officer. JUDGMENT2008.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.362/2017 under Sections 307/195-A/394/3IPC read with Section Arms Act, Police Station Ranhola.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner had shot the complainant, who is his wife. The allegations are that a complaint was lodged by the complainant against the accused petitioner of BAIL APPLN. 1092/2018 Page 1 of 3 misbehaving with their daughter. The complainant was being pressurised to withdraw the case. When she refused, the petitioner is alleged to have shot the ...
Suresh Kumar Rathore & Others vs.the State, (Govt. Of n.c.t. Of Delhi) ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~61 & 64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4176/2018 Judgment delivered on:.20.08.2018 SURESH KUMAR RATHORE & OTHERS ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE, (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ANR....respondents + CRL.M.C. 4184/2018 SURESH KUMAR RATHORE & ANOTHER THE STATE, (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ANR..... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner(s) : For the Respondent(s): CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr.Ravinder Tyagi, Adv. Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with W/ASI Santosh, P.S.South Rohini. Mr.Manoj Sharma, Adv. for R-2. JUDGMENT2008.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 30241/2018 CRL.M.A. 30248/2018 Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C.4176/2018 & 4184/2018 Page 1 of 4 CRL.M.C. 4176/2018 & Crl.M.C.4184/2018 1.... Petitioners in Crl. M.C. 4176/2018 seek quashing of FIR No.177/2017 under Sections 323/354/354A/354B/5at Police Station South Rohini and... P...
Fakir Chand Pal & Anr. Vs.rajinder Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment: August 20, 2018 + MAC.APP. 173/2013 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate Versus + MAC.APP. 300/2013 FAKIR CHAND PAL & ANR. FAKIR CHAND PAL & ORS. Through: Mr. Aditya Sharda, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Nemo Versus ..... Appellant RAJINDER SINGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth and Mr. Aditya, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The above captioned two appeals are directed against Award of 26th November, 2012 vide which compensation of 6,04,320/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum has been awarded to Claimants. In the above captioned first appeal, the Insurer seeks exoneration on the ground of lack of negligence on the part of driver of Insured vehicle and reduction of quantum of compensation granted, whereas in the above captioned second appeal, MAC. APP. 173/2013 MAC. APP. 300/2013 Page 1 of 6 enhancement of compensation is so...
Nitin Tyagi & Ors vs.election Commission of India&anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~37 and 38 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.7612/2018 Date of decision:20. h August, 2018. NITIN TYAGI & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Vashisht, Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Mr. Rikky Gupta, Mr. Kamal Mehta, Ms. Rani Raghunath, Ms. Manshury Jha and Mr. Kapil Gupta, Advocates. versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA&ANR...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Sharma, Mr. Dipesh Sinha, Mr. Pratik Kumar and Ms. Ayial Imti, Advocates. WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.7635/2018 SHRI KAILASH GAHLOT AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Vashisht, Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Mr. Rikky Gupta, Mr. Kamal Mehta, Ms. Rani Raghunath, Ms. Manshury Jha and Mr. Kapil Gupta, Advocates. versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANR...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arvindkr Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amit Sharma, Mr. Dipesh Sinha, Mr. Pratik Kumar and Ms. Ayial Imti, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. J...
Aditya Sharma vs.income Tax Department
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~12 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"20th August, 2018 CRL. M.C. 4666/2015 & CRL. 16736/2015 ADITYA SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Handoo & Ms. Aditya Chaudhary, Advs. versus INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing counsel for Income Tax Department. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On the criminal complaint (CC No.96/2004) dated 27.01.2015 of the respondent, the petitioner was summoned as (second) accused by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM), by his order dated 30.01.2015, the other (first) accused being Moin Akhtar Quereshi. The criminal complaint was filed, inter alia, on the strength of sanction for prosecution under Section 279 of Income Tax Act, 1961 accorded by the Director of Income Tax (Investigation) - 02, Delhi on 09.01.2015.2. The background facts, as set out in the criminal complaint, would reveal that a search and seizure action was carried out in the premises...
Tapan Bhowmik vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(CRL) 3046/2015 and Crl. M.A. No.18714/2015 (Stay) Reserved on:30. h July, 2018 Decided on:20. h August, 2018 HARADHAN BHOWMIK ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Raghav Bansal and Mr. Shashwat Bansal, Advocates. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Piyush Singhal, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Additional Standing Counsel for State with SI Manish Kumar, EOW. + W.P.(CRL) 2333/2016 and Crl. M.A. No.12196/2016 (Stay) BIJANENDU BHOWMIK ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Raghav Bansal and Mr.Shashwat Bansal, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT) DELHI& ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel for State, Mr. Chaitanya Gosain and Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Advocates with SI Manish Kumar, EOW. + W.P.(CRL) 2340/2016 and Crl. M.A. No.12214/2016 (Stay) TAPAN BHOWMIK ........ Petitioner W.P.(CRL) 3046/2015, 2333/2016 and 2340/2016 Page 1 of 11 Represented by: Mr. Raghav Bansal...
Shubhashish Ganguly & Anr. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3124/2018 Judgment delivered on:20. 08.2018 SHUBHASHISH GANGULY & ANR versus THE STATE & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Ms.Namita Roy and Mr. Abhijit Acharaya, Advs. Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ashok Ahlawat Mr. Sandeep Kaushik and Mr. Muskan Sharma, Advocates for R-2 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2008.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.377 of 2014 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC registered at Police Vikas Puri, New Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.2. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes by way of a settlement before the Lok Adalat dated 11.02.2017. As per the settlement, a total sum of Rs. 15 lakhs CRL.M.C. 3124/2018 Page 1 of 3 h...