Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.deepak & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of decision: August 21, 2018 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Ms. Seema Gulati, Advocate ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. K.B.B.Singh & Mr. Vikrant Guleria, Advocates for respondents No.3 & 4 + MAC.APP. 709/2016 INDU DEVI & ORS. Versus + MAC.APP. 680/2016 DEEPAK & ORS. Versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Ms. Seema Gulati, Advocate ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. K.B.B.Singh & Mr. Vikrant Guleria, Advocates for respondents No.2 & 3 + MAC.APP. 677/2018 INDU DEVI & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate Page 1 of 8 MAC.APP. 709/2016 MAC.APP. 680/2016 MAC.APP. 677/2018 1. Versus NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS. Through: Ms. Seema Gulati, Advocate for ........ RESPONDENTS respondent No.1 Mr. K.B.B.Singh & Mr. Vikrant Guleria, Advocates for respondents No.2 & 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. ...
Narayan Singh & Anr. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
$~2 & 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3014/2018 Judgment delivered on:21.08.2018 NARAYAN SINGH & ANR versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR + CRL.M.C. 3038/2018 KAMLESH STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner(s) : For the Respondent(s): Mr.Rajeshwar Dagar and Mr.Ravinder Hooda, Advs. for petitioners in Crl.M.C.3014/2018. Mr.Syed Hasan Isfahani, Adv. for petitioner in Crl.M.C.3038/2018. Mr.Raghuvinder Verma, Addl. PP for the State with SI B.K.Bharti, P.S.Jaffarpur Kalan. Mr.Syed Hasan Crl.M.C.3014/2018. Mr.Rajeshwar Dagar and Mr.Ravinder Hooda, Advs. for R-2 in Crl.M.C.3038/2018. Isfahani, Adv. for R-2 in CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2108.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.C. 3014/2018 & 3038/2018 Page 1 of 3 1.... Petitioners in Crl.M.C.3014/2018 seek quashing of FIR No.29/2012 under Sections 452/323/5IPC ...
Mrs. Harwant Kaur Sabharwal vs.mrs. Davinder Kaur Chadha & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
$~OS-8 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. 08.2018 CS(OS) 693/2017 MRS. HARWANT KAUR SABHARWAL ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.P.S.Bindra, Adv. versus MRS. DAVINDER KAUR CHADHA & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Tanmay Mehta, Mr.Anurag Sahay and Mr.Siddhant Singh, Advs. for D- 1 to 3. Mr.Amit Sethi, Adv. for D-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, (ORAL) IA No.3715/2018 1.2. This application is filed seeking amendment in the plaint. The plaintiff has filed the suit seeking a decree of specific performance of the Oral Family Settlement dated 30.08.2015. The plaintiff has also sought a decree of declaration declaring the Will dated 25.05.2017 as null and void; a decree declaring the Codicil dated 31.05.2017 as null and void. Further a decree is sought declaring the Nominee Transfer Form dated 07.04.2017, Bond Transfer Form dated 24.05.2017 and Gift deed dated 20.03.2017 as being null and void. Other connected relief...
Arun Singh Chauhan vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.5003/2018 ARUN SINGH CHAUHAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through Ms.Barkha Babbar, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % 1. ORDER2108.2018 The petitioner, a Major in the Indian Army, has filed the present petition under Articleof the Constitution of India, seeking directions to the respondents to permit him to proceed on study leave to pursue a M.Sc. course in International Strategy and Diplomacy at the London School of Economics and Political Science (hereinafter referred to as LSE).2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the petitioner upon being commissioned in the Indian Army on 17.03.2007 as a Lieutenant, was promoted to the rank of Captain on 17.10.2009 and thereafter as a Major on 17.10.2013. As on date, he has completed over eleven years of service in the WP (C) No.5003/2018 Page 1 of 14 Indian A...
Raj Singh vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Order: August 21, 2018 + W.P.(C) 9285/2015 RAJ SINGH Through: Mr. V.P.Rana & Ms. Pooja Wason, ........ Petitioner Advocates Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel & Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned order of 23rd July, 2014 (Annexure-A) rejects petitioners application for allotment of alternate plot in lieu of acquired land on the ground that the subject land was built up and was not being used for agricultural activities. Impugned order notes that since the subject land was not being used for agricultural purpose, so, applicant/ petitioner is not entitled for allotment of alternate plot against acquisition of his land. As per the guide lines of Government of NCT of Delhi for allotment of alternate plot, if the built up acquired land of more than 20% is not taken over in the acquisition proceedings, then such applicant is not...
Lalita vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"21st August, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 4107/2016 LALITA Through: Ms. Shashi Bala for Mr. Anil K. ........ Petitioner Batra, Advocate with Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate. versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State with ASI Shiv Charan, P.S. Vijay Vihar. Mr. Mahendra Singh, Adv. with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The case (first information report) (FIR) No.417/2013 was registered by Police Station Vijay Vihar at the instance of the petitioner (wife), inter alia, against the second respondent (the husband), it involving offences punishable under Sections 498A/4Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The second respondent (husband) was arrested in the course of the said investigation, his bail application (no.1834/2013) having come up before this Court on 11.10.2013. The said respondent was produced from custody pursuant to the production warrants that were issued. The parties a...
Bijanendu Bhowmik vs.state (Govt of Nct) Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(CRL) 3046/2015 and Crl. M.A. No.18714/2015 (Stay) Reserved on:30. h July, 2018 Decided on:20. h August, 2018 HARADHAN BHOWMIK ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Raghav Bansal and Mr. Shashwat Bansal, Advocates. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Piyush Singhal, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Additional Standing Counsel for State with SI Manish Kumar, EOW. + W.P.(CRL) 2333/2016 and Crl. M.A. No.12196/2016 (Stay) BIJANENDU BHOWMIK ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Raghav Bansal and Mr.Shashwat Bansal, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT) DELHI& ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel for State, Mr. Chaitanya Gosain and Mr. Jamal Akhtar, Advocates with SI Manish Kumar, EOW. + W.P.(CRL) 2340/2016 and Crl. M.A. No.12214/2016 (Stay) TAPAN BHOWMIK ........ Petitioner W.P.(CRL) 3046/2015, 2333/2016 and 2340/2016 Page 1 of 11 Represented by: Mr. Raghav Bansal...
Rajesh Singh vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
Judgment delivered on:20. 08.2018 $~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RAJESH SINGH THE STATE CRL.M.C. 1448/2018 & CRL.M.A. 5265/2018 versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: Mr. Rakesh Mittal, Adv. Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai, APP for the State with IO CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2008.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.331/2003 under Section 411 of the IPC registered at Police Station Kotwali, Delhi.2. The allegations in the FIR are that an information was received that surgical supplies meant for Govt. Departments and hospitals were being stolen and diverted. A raid was conducted and at the premises of a co-accused, drug items and surgical supply items were recovered from the said person. It is alleged that the co-accused disclosed the CRL.M.C. 1448/2018 Page 1 of 8 name of the petitioner.3. The petitioner is alleged to have been app...
Anjana Khaneja vs.state Bank of Patiala
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.230/2005 % ANJANA KHANEJA20h August, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Biji Rajesh, Advocate (Mobile No.9717577733). versus STATE BANK OF PATIALA ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 28.1.2005 by which the trial court dismissed the suit for recovery of Rs.8,62,336/-. Defendant in the suit is State Bank of Patiala.2. The basic issue in the suit and the appeal was/is whether the respondent/defendant-bank was entitled to deduct one additional percent of the Fixed Deposit amount, in addition to giving a 2% lesser RFA No.230/2005 Page 1 of 6 interest rate than as payable on completion of Fixed Deposit period, as charges on account of premature conversion by the appell...
Jagjeet Singh vs.united India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of decision: August 20, 2018 + MAC.APP. 228/2013 JAGJEET SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Suvesh Sharma, Advocate with appellant in person Versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate + MAC.APP. 804/2014 1. SH RAMESH CHANDRA SHARMA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Nemo. Versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE LTD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned two appeals are directed against Award of 30th November, 2012 vide which compensation of `11,83,400/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum has been awarded to Claimants. In the above captioned first appeal, Owner of the insured vehicle seeks exoneration from paying the awarded compensation, whereas in the above captioned MAC.APP. 228/2013 MAC.APP. 804/2014 Page 1 of 6 second appeal, enhancement of compensation is sought by Claimants. Since these two...