Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pradeep Kumar Khera vs.engineering Projects (India) Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of pronouncement:17. h August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 8613/2018 & CM APPLs.33060-33061/2018 PRADEEP KUMAR KHERA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.M. Sarada and Mr.Rajeev Gulani, Advs. versus ENGINEERING PROJECTS (INDIA) LIMITED & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel for GNCTD with Ms.Palak Rohmeta, Adv. for R-1 & 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % ORDER (ORAL) CM APPL.33061/2018 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 8613/2018 & CM APPL.33060/2018 (for stay) 1. After arguing the matter for some time, Ms.Sarada, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she would be satisfied, for the nonce, if this writ petition is disposed of with a direction, to the respondent, to expeditiously decide the representation, dated 10th August, 2018, submitted by her client. W.P.(C) 8613/2018 Page 1 of 2 2. In view of the said submission, this...
Rakesh Kanaujia vs.m/s Superwhite Drycleaners & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.665/2018 % RAKESH KANAUJIA17h August, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Biswas, Advocate (Mobile No.9810813936). versus M/S SUPERWHITE DRYCLEANERS & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.32831/2018 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Appl. No.32830/2018 (for delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application the delay of 41 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned, subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.665/2018 Page 1 of 22 RFA No.665/2018 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 31.1.2018 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit for rendition of accounts of the respondent No.1/defendant No.1/partnership...
Rajeev Verma & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
$~84 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 4165/2018 RAJEEV VERMA & ORS. THE STATE & ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: Mr.Anshuman Gargesh, Adv. Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State with SI Himanshu Balyan Mr.Deepak Sharma, Adv. for R-2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1708.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 30200/2018(Exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4165/2018 & Crl. M.A. 30199/2018 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner No.5 and 6 could not be present today on account of heavy traffic. He submits that they have filed affidavits in support of the petition and are agreeable to the quashing of the subject FIR. He prays that they CRL.M.C. 4165/2018 Page 1 of 3 may be granted exemption from personal appearance. In view of the above, petitioner No.5 an...
Gulshan Singh vs.hari Chand (Deceased) Through Lrs & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h August, 2018 GULSHAN SINGH RSA2822017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.C. Singhal, Adv. Versus HARI CHAND (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun K. Yadav, Adv. for LRs of R-1. AND RSA632018 & CMs No.15472/2018 (for condonation of 45 days delay in filing), 15473/2018 (for stay) & 15475/2018 (for condonation of 37 days delay in re-filing the appeal) GULSHAN SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.C. Singhal, Adv. Versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun K. Yadav, Adv. for LRs of R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 RSA No.282/2017 impugns the judgment [dated 14th September, 2017 in CIS-RCA DJ-8743-2016 (CNR-DLST01-000170-2013) of the Court of District Judge (South)]. of dismissal as abated of the First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree [dated 31st Oct...
Ram Chander vs.bisania & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.314/1997 Reserved on :6. h August, 2018 Pronounced on :17thAugust, 2018 RAM CHANDER BISANIA & ORS. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr. Kshitij Arora, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Sahu, ........ RESPONDENTS Advocate for respondent Nos.1 & 2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J1 This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 24.4.1997 by which the trial court dismissed the suit for recovery of possession and mesne profits filed by the appellant/plaintiff with respect to part of the subject property being House No.289, Krishna Gali, Chhota Bazar, RFA No.314/1997 Page 1 of 11 Kashmere Gate, Delhi. The suit property comprises of one room, open courtyard and latrine on the first floor of the subject property. Trial...
Ram Niwas vs.o.p.khanna (Decd.) Thru Lrs & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % RAM NIWAS RFA No.669/2018 17th August, 2018 Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Khatri, Advocate. (9717960907) O.P.KHANNA (DECD.) THRU LRS & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Ms. Vandana Aneja and Ms. Nisha Sharma, Advocates. (9910507896) CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) Caveat No.737/2018 Counsel appears for the caveator. Caveat accordingly stands discharged. CM No.32889/2018(Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. RFA No.669/2018 Page 1 of 12 RFA No.669/2018 & CM No.32888/2018(stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 5.7.2018 by which trial court has decreed the suit for declaration, mandatory and permanent injunction filed by the respondents/plaintiffs w...
Pawan Kumar Sharma & Ors. Vs.the State ( Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
$~72 & 80 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Judgment delivered on:17. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 4151/2018 PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. CRL.M.C. 4159/2018 VINAY SHARMA & ORS versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. J.K. Sharma, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State. ASI Udayan Rana, PS Kanjhawala in CRL.M.C. 4151/2018 ASI Anand Kumar, PS Kanjhawala in Crl.M.C.4159/2018. JUDGMENT1708.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.30156/2018 (exemption) in CRL.M.C. 4151/2018 CRL.M.C. 4151/2018 CRL.M.C.4159/2018 & Page 1 of 3 Crl.M.A.30186/2018 (exemption) in CRL.M.C. 4159/2018 Exemptions are allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4151/2018 & CRL.M.C. 4159/2018 1.... Petitioners in Crl.M.C.4151/2018 seek quashing of FIR No.43...
Subinder Singh Tokas vs.land & Building Department
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Order: August 17, 2018 + W.P.(C) 8386/2016 DEEP CHAND Through: Mr. N.S.Dalal & Mr. Devesh ........ Petitioner Pratap Singh, Advocates Versus LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate + W.P.(C) 8458/2016 SUBINDER SINGH TOKAS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. N.S.Dalal & Mr. Devesh Pratap Singh, Advocates Versus LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions, denial of consideration of 1. application for alternate plot in lieu of acquired land is under challenge by placing reliance upon order of 8th November, 2017 of a Division Bench of W.P.(C) 8386/2016 W.P.(C) 8458/2016 Page 1 of 3 this Court in LPA No.276/2017, titled as Shri Jai Bhagwan Vs. Land & Building Department.2. With the consent of counsel for the...
Dalbir Singh Sohi vs.punjab & Sind Bank & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. d February, 2018 Pronounced on:17. h August, 2018 + W.P.(C) 8614/2003 DALBIR SINGH SOHI ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Geetanjali Mohan, Advocate versus PUNJAB & SIND BANK & ANR. Through Mr.Jagat Arora Mr.Rajat Arora, Advocates ........ RESPONDENTS and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. Dalbir Singh Sohi, the petitioner, joined the services of the Respondent No.2-Bank (hereinafter referred to as the Bank) in 1974. On 30th March, 1991, he applied, to the Bank, for being sanctioned two months earned leave, w.e.f. 10th April, 1991, to enable him to attend the marriage of his niece in Canada. Leave, as prayed for, was admittedly sanctioned, to the petitioner, by the Bank, for the period 7th May, 1991 to 6th July, 1991 (the Bank calls it privilege leave).2. The petitioner, thereafter, applied for extension of leave, on 29th June, 1991 and 28th July, 1991, for thirty days on each occasion, ...
Rajiv Sharma vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
Judgment delivered on:17. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 1919/2018 $~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RAJIV SHARMA STATE & ANR. versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Ms. Pallavi Kansal and Mr. Deepak Pandey, Advs. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State with SI R.P. Singh. Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Arnav Vidyarthi, Adv. for R-2 Mr. Pradeep Baisoya, Assistant Manager-Legal, BSES-RPL CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1708.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.190/2017 under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, Police Station Sunlight Colony, New Delhi, based on a settlement.2. The subject FIR was registered for theft of electricity consequent to an inspection. A direct theft bill of Rs. 3,43,606/- was raised. The matter was referred to Special Lok Adalat. Thereafter, the said amount was set...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »