Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Global Car Group Pte. Limited & Anr vs.droom Technology Private Limite ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:17. hAugust , 2018 CS(COMM) 897/2018 GLOBAL CAR GROUP PTE. LIMITED & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr.Anil Sapra, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ajay Kohli, Ms.Bhumika Kapoor, Ms.Pooja Vohra, Mr.Jaideep Singh, Mr.Sarthak Katyal, Advocates. versus DROOM TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Defendant Through: Mr.Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr.Nitin Bhatiam, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT I.A.7047/2018 1. The plaintiffs are seeking interim injunction against the defendant from publishing and circulating the impugned advertisement comprising of the Pop up, Second Link and Third Link. According to the plaintiffs, the defendants advertisement disparages and denigrates the business, services, goodwill, reputation and trademark/tag line of the plaintiffs.2. The plaintiffs are carrying on the business of sale of used/pre-owned cars in the name of Cars24. The plaintiffs have developed an advertisement campaign ...
M/S. Novateur Electrical & Digital Systems Pvt Ltd. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
$~11 to 19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"17th August, 2018 CRL.M.C. 3572/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS CRL.M.C. 3583/2016 CRL.M.C. 3582/2016 versus versus + M/S. NOVATEUR ELECTRICAL & DIGITAL SYSTEMS PVT LTD. ........ Petitioner STATE & ANR. + M/S. NOVATEUR ELECTRICAL & DIGITAL SYSTEMS PVT LTD. ........ Petitioner STATE & ORS. + M/S. NOVATEUR ELECTRICAL & DIGITAL SYSTEMS PVT LTD. ........ Petitioner STATE & ORS. + M/S. NOVATEUR ELECTRICAL & DIGITAL SYSTEMS PVT LTD. ..... Petitioner STATE & ANR. + M/S. NOVATEUR ELECTRICAL & DIGITAL SYSTEMS PVT LTD. ........ Petitioner STATE & ORS. versus versus versus CRL.M.C. 3584/2016 CRL.M.C. 3585/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS Crl. M.C. No.3572/2016 & conn.matters Page 1 of 5 CRL.M.C. 3587/2016 CRL.M.C. 3586/2016 versus + M/S. NOVATEUR ELECTRICAL & DIGITAL SYSTEMS PVT LTD. ........ Petitioner STATE & ORS. + M/S. NOVATEUR ELECTRICAL & DIGITAL SYSTEMS PVT LTD. ........ Petiti...
Yogesh Gupta vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:3. d August, 2018 Decided on:17. h August, 2018 BAIL APPLN. 1613/2018 YOGESH GUPTA ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Aggarwal, Mr. P.K. Aggarwal, Mr. Bharat Sharma, Mr.Ekansh Aggarwal and Mr.Akshat Aggarwal, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with ACP Naresh Kumar, Operation Cell, Central District. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By this petition, the petitioner seeks bail in case FIR No.72/2017 under Sections 420/409/468/471/201/120-B IPC registered at PS Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been in custody for nearly ten months now since 29th September, 2017 and is no more required for investigation. Co-accused Subhash Jindal has already been granted bail. The prime accused Narinder Jain is absconding till date and has not joined the investigation, thus...
Dinesh Kumar vs.the State ( Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4161/2018 DINESH KUMAR THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ORS versus Judgment delivered on:17. 08.2018 ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate. Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for the State. SI Vinay Kumar, PS Neb Sarai. For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1708.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.30190/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4161/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.173/2016 under Sections 354-D/506 IPC read with Section 12 POCSO Act, Police Station Neb Sarai.2. The subject FIR was registered consequent to a complaint given by the complainant. It is stated by the respondent No.2 that the CRL.M.C. 4161/2018 Page 1 of 2 complaint was made at the asking of her father.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have settled their di...
Dr. R. N. Gupta Technical Educational Society vs.union of India and An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8649/2018 DR. R. N. GUPTA TECHNICAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY Through Mr Aseem Mehrotra, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through Ms Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr Kushal Kumar, Advocate. Mr T. Singhdev, Ms Biakthan Sangi Das, Advocates for MCI. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1708.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning a letter dated 09.05.2014 (hereafter the impugned letter) issued by the Medical Council of India (respondent no.2 hereafter MCI) and further praying that directions be issued to the respondents for refunding 7,00,000/- with interest.2. The aforesaid amount of 7,00,000/- was deposited by the petitioner along with its application for establishment of a new Medical College at Agra, Uttar Pradesh. This application was made for the academic year commencing in 2014. This application was rejected by the MCI by a let...
Gulshan Singh vs.municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h August, 2018 GULSHAN SINGH RSA2822017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.C. Singhal, Adv. Versus HARI CHAND (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun K. Yadav, Adv. for LRs of R-1. AND RSA632018 & CMs No.15472/2018 (for condonation of 45 days delay in filing), 15473/2018 (for stay) & 15475/2018 (for condonation of 37 days delay in re-filing the appeal) GULSHAN SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.C. Singhal, Adv. Versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun K. Yadav, Adv. for LRs of R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 RSA No.282/2017 impugns the judgment [dated 14th September, 2017 in CIS-RCA DJ-8743-2016 (CNR-DLST01-000170-2013) of the Court of District Judge (South)]. of dismissal as abated of the First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree [dated 31st Oct...
N K Jain vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
Date of Judgment:17. h August, 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~23 * % + W.P.(C) 8478/2017 Through Mr. Samit Khosla, Advocate. versus CORAM: N K JAIN UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through Mr. Prashant Varma, SCGC with Ms. Shalu Goswami, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate, for L&B/LAC. Mr. Arjun Pant, Advocate for DDA. ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated in respect of the land of petitioner measuring 7 bighas and 6 biswas, comprised in Mustatil no.76, Killa no.2(4-12), 9(2-14), situated in the revenue estate of village Devli, Tehsil Mehrauli, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation a...
Rashid Hussain & Ors. Vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
$~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4150/2018 RASHID HUSSAIN & ORS. THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI) & ANR. versus Judgment delivered on:17. 08.2018 ........ Petitioners ..Respondents Mr. Rashid Hussain with Mr. Javed Hussain, Advocates with petitioners in person. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State. SI Jitender, PS Welcome. Mr. Anuj Tomar, Advocate for respondent No.2. JUDGMENT1708.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.30155/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL. M.C. 4150/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.276/2013 under Sections 498A/4IPC and Section 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Police Station Welcome Colony. CRL.M.C. 4150/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2.... Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are the fath...
M vs.A
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:17. h August, 2018 + MAT.APP. 79/2010 M Through: Ms. Kajal Chandra, Ms. Prerna Chopra and Mr. Vivek Kapur, Advocates ..... Appellant A versus Through: Mr. I.V. Raghav, Advocate along with ..... Respondent respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The appellant has challenged the judgment dated 23rd February, 2010 whereby his petition for dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act has been dismissed.2. The parties were married according to the Hindu rites and ceremonies on 1st April, 1988 and three children were born out of their wedlock, namely, one daughter and two sons. On 29th April, 2005, the appellant filed a petition for dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty on various grounds inter alia that the respondent had treated the appellant with cruelty; there were continuous fights between the parties since marriage; the respondent di...
Tanishq Gangwar & Ors vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:30. 07.2018 Pronounced on:17. 08.2018 + W.P.(C) 6773/2018 & CM APPL. 25697-98/2018, 28282/2018, 28287-88/2018 & 29674-75/2018 TANISHQ GANGWAR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Avijit Mani Tripathi, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms. Gauraan and Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocates for UOI. Mr.Vikas Singh, Sr.Advocate with Mr. T. Singhdev, Ms. Amandeep Kaur and Ms. Puja Sarkar, Advocates for R-2. Mr. Amit Bansal and Ms. Seema Dolo, Advocates for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT1 In these writ proceedings, the... Petitioners challenge the constitutional validity of the Regulations on Graduate Medical Education(Amendment), WP(C) No.6773/2018 Page 1 2018 (impugned amendment hereafter) issued by notification dated 22.01.2018 by the Medical Council of India (MCI hereafter) with the previous approval ...
- ‹ Prev
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- Next ›
- Last »