Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Insurance Co Ltd vs.indu Devi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of decision: August 21, 2018 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Ms. Seema Gulati, Advocate ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. K.B.B.Singh & Mr. Vikrant Guleria, Advocates for respondents No.3 & 4 + MAC.APP. 709/2016 INDU DEVI & ORS. Versus + MAC.APP. 680/2016 DEEPAK & ORS. Versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Ms. Seema Gulati, Advocate ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. K.B.B.Singh & Mr. Vikrant Guleria, Advocates for respondents No.2 & 3 + MAC.APP. 677/2018 INDU DEVI & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate Page 1 of 8 MAC.APP. 709/2016 MAC.APP. 680/2016 MAC.APP. 677/2018 1. Versus NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS. Through: Ms. Seema Gulati, Advocate for ........ RESPONDENTS respondent No.1 Mr. K.B.B.Singh & Mr. Vikrant Guleria, Advocates for respondents No.2 & 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. ...
Jogender Sharma @ Raju & Ors. Vs.state & Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3637/2018 Judgment delivered on:21. 08.2018 JOGENDER SHARMA @ RAJU & ORS. STATE & ANOTHER versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr.A.K.Azad, Adv. Mr.Kamal Kr.Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with SI Ashish Kumar, P.S.Bhajanpura. Mohd.Elahi, Adv. for R-2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2108.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.1483 of 2014 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC registered at Police Station Bhajanpura, Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.2. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes by way of a settlement dated 23.04.2018 before the Counselling Cell, Family Courts, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi.3. As per the settlement, a total sum of Rs. 10,00,000/- has been agreed to be paid to ...
Aradhana Foods and Juices Pvt. Ltd vs.commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
$~13 and 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.701/2017 and CM No.30647/2017 INCOME TAX APPEAL No.702/2017 and CM No.30648/2017 Date of decision:21. t August, 2018. ARADHANA FOODS AND JUICES PVT. LTD..... Appellant Through: Mr. Deepak Chopra, Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Mr. Rashi Khanna and Mr. Yojit Pareek, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel & Mr. Deepak Anand, Jr. Standing Counsel for Revenue. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Above captioned appeals preferred by Aradhana Foods and Juices Private Limited ('appellant-assessee' for short) under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short), challenge the order dated 5th June, 2017 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) in ITA No.2427/Del/2011 filed by the assessee and ITA No.2340/Del/2011 filed by the Revenue for the Assessment Year 2007-08.2....
Hitesh Kakkar vs.sanjay Kakkar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % HITESH KAKKAR RFA No.362/2018 21st August, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Mishra, Advocate with Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey, Advocate (M. No.9650732474). SANJAY KAKKAR & ANR. versus Through: ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 7.12.2017 by which trial court has dismissed the suit for partition, possession, rendition of accounts and injunction filed by the appellant/plaintiff with respect to the suit property being plot no.49, Block-A, part of Killa No.10, Rect. No.35 situated in the abadi known as Radhey Sham Park Extn. of village Khureji Khas, Shahdara, Delhi-110051 (admeasuring 100 sq RFA No.362/2018 Page 1 of 6 yds.). The appellant/plaintiff is the nephew of two defendants...
Madhu vs.moti Ram & Ors (Tata Aig General Ins Co Ltd)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: August 21, 2018 + MAC.APP. 408/2017 SAVITRI DEVI (DECEASED) THR HER LRS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V.V. Gautam and Mr. Prashant Dubey, Advocates versus MOTI RAM & ORS (TATA AIG GENERAL INS CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goel, Advocate for Mr. Sameer Nadwani, Advocate for respondent-Insurer + MAC.APP. 415/2017 MADHU Through: Mr. V.V. Gautam and Mr. Prashant ..... Appellant versus Dubey, Advocates MOTI RAM & ORS (TATA AIG GENERAL INS CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goel, Advocate for Mr. Sameer Nadwani, Advocate for respondent-Insurer + MAC.APP. 418/2017 LATIKA SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V.V. Gautam and Mr. Prashant Dubey, Advocates versus MAC.APP. 408/2017 MAC.APP. 415/2017 MAC.APP. 418/2017 Page 1 of 11 1. MOTI RAM & ORS (TATA AIG GENERAL INS CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goel, Advocate for Mr. Sameer Nadwani, Advocate for respondent-Insurer CORAM: HON'BLE MR....
Indu Devi & Anr. Vs.national Insurance Company Ltd & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of decision: August 21, 2018 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Ms. Seema Gulati, Advocate ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. K.B.B.Singh & Mr. Vikrant Guleria, Advocates for respondents No.3 & 4 + MAC.APP. 709/2016 INDU DEVI & ORS. Versus + MAC.APP. 680/2016 DEEPAK & ORS. Versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD. Through: Ms. Seema Gulati, Advocate ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. K.B.B.Singh & Mr. Vikrant Guleria, Advocates for respondents No.2 & 3 + MAC.APP. 677/2018 INDU DEVI & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate Page 1 of 8 MAC.APP. 709/2016 MAC.APP. 680/2016 MAC.APP. 677/2018 1. Versus NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS. Through: Ms. Seema Gulati, Advocate for ........ RESPONDENTS respondent No.1 Mr. K.B.B.Singh & Mr. Vikrant Guleria, Advocates for respondents No.2 & 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. ...
Suraj vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 2307/2018 & CRL.M.A. 8193/2018 Judgment delivered on:21. 08.2018 ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS SURAJ versus STATE & ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr.Gaurav Gupta, Advocate. Ms.Neelam SharmaAPP for the State with SI Soamya Kulhar, P.S.Jaitpur. Mr.N.L.Suman, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2108.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.554/2014 under Sections 323/341/354D/5IPC, Police Station Jaitpur.2. At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Komal, the sister of respondent No.2 is impleaded as respondent No.3. Amended Memo of parties has already been filed. Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are present in Court.3. The parties are neighbours. Subject FIR was registered on the allegation that the petitioner proposed to the respondent No.2/complainant even after she had got married which led to a quarrel...
Archana Chopra vs.shashi Roy and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % ARCHANA CHOPRA RFA No.681/2018 21st August, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Ashish Sharma, and Mr. Kunal Advocate Vashist, Advocate (M. No.9911794319). SHASHI ROY AND ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.33561/2018(exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. No.33562/2018 (for condonation of delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 99 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.681/2018 Page 1 of 11 RFA No.681/2018 and C.M. No.33560/2018 (stay) 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 14.12.2017 by which trial court has dismissed the suit for injunction filed by the app...
Savitri Devi (Deceased) Thr Her Lrs vs.moti Ram & Ors (Tata Aig Genera ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: August 21, 2018 + MAC.APP. 408/2017 SAVITRI DEVI (DECEASED) THR HER LRS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V.V. Gautam and Mr. Prashant Dubey, Advocates versus MOTI RAM & ORS (TATA AIG GENERAL INS CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goel, Advocate for Mr. Sameer Nadwani, Advocate for respondent-Insurer + MAC.APP. 415/2017 MADHU Through: Mr. V.V. Gautam and Mr. Prashant ..... Appellant versus Dubey, Advocates MOTI RAM & ORS (TATA AIG GENERAL INS CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goel, Advocate for Mr. Sameer Nadwani, Advocate for respondent-Insurer + MAC.APP. 418/2017 LATIKA SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V.V. Gautam and Mr. Prashant Dubey, Advocates versus MAC.APP. 408/2017 MAC.APP. 415/2017 MAC.APP. 418/2017 Page 1 of 11 1. MOTI RAM & ORS (TATA AIG GENERAL INS CO LTD) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Navneet Goel, Advocate for Mr. Sameer Nadwani, Advocate for respondent-Insurer CORAM: HON'BLE MR....
Surjit Manna vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. 08.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1666/2018 SURJIT MANNA versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Tiwari, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State. SI Prabhanshu, Crime Branch CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2108.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.314/2017 under Sections 381/328/4IPC, Police Station Karol Bagh (now before the Special Investigation Cell).2. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner, who was an employee of the complainant, had after the complainant left from his BAIL APPLN. 1666/2018 Page 1 of 3 factory, which was that of making gold ornaments, celebrated the birthday of his son and gave some intoxicant to the other workers, after consuming which they became unconscious. In the morning when the complainant returne...