Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Highways Authority of India vs.som Dutt Builders -Ncc(jv)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~J- * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Pronounced on:20. 08.2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 252/2017 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA....... Petitioner Through Ms.Bhavana, Advocate versus SOM DUTT BUILDERS -NCC(JV) ..... Respondent Through Mr.Milenka Chaudhary, Mr.Abhishek Sharma & Mr.Vineet Dwivedi, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The present petition is filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to impugn the award passed by the learned arbitral tribunal dated 14.02.2017. The majority award has been passed by the presiding arbitrator and the co-arbitrator rejecting the claims of the respondent except claim Nos.1 and 3. The second co-arbitrator Sh.Puran Chand has passed a separate award also rejecting all the claims of the respondent other than claim Nos.1 and 3. However, in the separate award, the quantification of the claims have been reduced.2. The brief facts are that pursuant to the issuance of a notice invi...
Ms. Sakshi Gupta vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~8, 41, 42 & 44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8522/2018 & CM No.32769/2018 SMT. SUNITA GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Varun Jain and Mr Navin Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr Sidharth Singh and Mr R. R. Rai, Advocates for UOI. Mr Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel. WITH + W.P.(C) 8468/2018 & CM No.32548/2018 SHRI PREM CHAND GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Varun Jain and Mr Navin Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr Siddharth Singh, Advocates for R-1/UOI. Mr Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel. WITH W.P.(C) 8522/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 17 + W.P.(C) 8470/2018 & CM No.32550/2018 SHUBHAM GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Varun Jain and Mr Navin Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr Siddharth Singh, Advocates for R-1/U...
Vijay Singh vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-2018
$~23 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"20th August, 2018 CRL. M.C. 2766/2016 VIJAY SINGH STATE & ORS. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Sarna, Ms. Mamta Sarna & Mr. Pradeep Kataria, Advs. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the State with SI Sanjeet Singh, PS Rajouri Garden. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petition at hand was filed invoking the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) to seek quashing of the proceedings arising out of FIR No.804/2006 under Sections 420/511/468/471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) of police station Rajouri Garden, primarily on the basis of settlement of the dispute with the third respondent, it being accompanied amongst others by an affidavit of Paramjeet Singh, director of the third respondent (company), he having submitted his no objection to the prayer in the petition in terms, inter alia, of he having been authorize...
b.s.n.l & Ors. Vs.ram Pratap & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on - 09.08.2018 Date of Decision- 17.08.2018 + W.P.(C) 3612/2017 & CM No.15859/2017 (stay) B.S.N.L & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. R.V.Sinha Mr.A.S.Singh, Advs. with versus RAM PRATAP & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Lalit Kumar Jha, Adv for R-1. Mr.Kavindra Gill, Adv for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI JUDGMENT REKHA PALLI, J1 The present writ petition under Articleof the Constitution of India, impugns the order dated 07.10.2016, passed by the Principal Bench, Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi in OA No.4352/2014, whereunder the Original Application filed by the respondent No.1, has been allowed by quashing the Disagreement Note dated 18.10.2012, the Penalty Order dated 23.04.2013 passed by WP (C) No.3612/2017 Page 1 of 12 the Disciplinary Authority as also the order dated 04.08.2013 passed by Appellate Authority, rejecting the respondent no.1s appeal.2. The brief fac...
Rajpal Singh Tanwar vs.kamal Nanda
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.672/2018 & CM Nos. 32946-47/2018 + % RAJPAL SINGH TANWAR Through:17. h August, 2018 ..... Appellant Mr. Jayant Mehta, Ms. Nupur Goswami and Mr. Sajal Jain, Advocates (9899016945) KAMAL NANDA versus ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 5.5.2018 by which the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff with respect to possession of the suit property being a plot bearing no.E-8, Kanwar Singh Colony Village Ranhaula, Nangloi, Delhi- 110041 as shown in red colour in the site plan Ex.PW1/1. RFA No.672/2018 Page 1 of 10 2. The subject suit for possession, permanent injunction and mandatory injunction was filed by the respondent/plaintiff pleading ownership of the s...
Vinay Sharma & Ors. Vs.the State ( Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
$~72 & 80 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Judgment delivered on:17. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 4151/2018 PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. CRL.M.C. 4159/2018 VINAY SHARMA & ORS versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. J.K. Sharma, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State. ASI Udayan Rana, PS Kanjhawala in CRL.M.C. 4151/2018 ASI Anand Kumar, PS Kanjhawala in Crl.M.C.4159/2018. JUDGMENT1708.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.30156/2018 (exemption) in CRL.M.C. 4151/2018 CRL.M.C. 4151/2018 CRL.M.C.4159/2018 & Page 1 of 3 Crl.M.A.30186/2018 (exemption) in CRL.M.C. 4159/2018 Exemptions are allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4151/2018 & CRL.M.C. 4159/2018 1.... Petitioners in Crl.M.C.4151/2018 seek quashing of FIR No.43...
Gail (India) Ltd vs.m/s Lanco Tanjore Power Co Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. 08.2018 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 182/2018 GAIL (INDIA) LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sachin Puri, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Yoginder Handoo, Mr. Kamil Khan and Mr. Dhananjay Grover, Advocates. versus M/S LANCO TANJORE POWER CO LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manu Seshadri and Ms. Tanvi Rana, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (ORAL) % CM APPL. 32866/2018 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. 32867/2018 (for condonation of delay) For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay of 6 days in filing the instant appeal is hereby condoned. CM stands disposed of. FAO(OS) (COMM) 182/2018 At the outset, it was urged on behalf of Gas Authority of India Ltd. (hereinafter GAIL) that the identical questions were considered FAO(OS) (COMM) 182/2018 Page 1 of 5 and pending consideration by the Supreme Court in transfer pro...
Jitender Singh vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:9. h August, 2018 Delivered on:17. h August, 2018 CRL.A. 835/2016 JITENDER SINGH ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Anurag Jain, Mr. Vinit Malhotra, Ms. Ayush Sharma, Mr. Tarun Khanna and Mr. Rahul Dubey, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok K. Garg, APP for CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA State.1. By the present appeal Jitender Singh challenges the impugned judgment dated 26th July 2016, whereby he was convicted for offences punishable under Sections 363/366/342/376 IPC and the order on sentence dated 1st August 2016 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for the period of three years and to pay a fine of 3000/-, in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of fifteen days for the offence punishable under Section 363 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and to a fine of 3000/- , in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a...
Vijender @ Sonu Donald @ Kailash & Ors. Vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
$~85 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4170/2018 VIJENDER @ SONU DONALD @ KAILASH & ORS. Judgment delivered on:17. 08.2018 versus ........ Petitioners THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Rakesh Sharma, Advocate. Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for the State. SI Kartar Singh, PS Bindapur. JUDGMENT1708.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.30190/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4161/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.11/2017 under Sections 427/323/341/5IPC, Police Station Bindapur.2. The parties are neighbours. The accused/petitioners had come to the shop of the complainant and purchased an item. Thereafter, when they did not pay and were confronted by the complainant, they assaulted CRL.M.C. 4170/2018 Page 1 of 2 the complainant and damaged some of the goods lying in t...
Deep Chand vs.land & Building Department
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Order: August 17, 2018 + W.P.(C) 8386/2016 DEEP CHAND Through: Mr. N.S.Dalal & Mr. Devesh ........ Petitioner Pratap Singh, Advocates Versus LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate + W.P.(C) 8458/2016 SUBINDER SINGH TOKAS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. N.S.Dalal & Mr. Devesh Pratap Singh, Advocates Versus LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions, denial of consideration of 1. application for alternate plot in lieu of acquired land is under challenge by placing reliance upon order of 8th November, 2017 of a Division Bench of W.P.(C) 8386/2016 W.P.(C) 8458/2016 Page 1 of 3 this Court in LPA No.276/2017, titled as Shri Jai Bhagwan Vs. Land & Building Department.2. With the consent of counsel for the...
- ‹ Prev
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- Next ›
- Last »