Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjeev Soni vs.general Insurance Public Sector Association (Gipsa) an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
$~61 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8786/2018 SANJEEV SONI ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Amit Bansal & Mr. Akhil Kulshrestha, Advocates versus GENERAL INSURANCE PUBLIC SECTOR ASSOCIATION (GIPSA) AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ORDER2108.2018 % VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner is a licensed insurance surveyor and has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the circular dated 15.03.2017 (hereafter the impugned circular) issued by the General Insurers (Public Sector) Association of India to the extent that it seeks to impose a cap on the fees payable to insurance surveyors in respect of the survey conducted by them. The petitioner also seeks a declaration that the fees fixed by the impugned circular is not inclusive of the cost incurred by a surveyor for physical verification of third party bills.2. At the outset, it is relevant to note that the impugned circular seeks to enhance the fees payable to insurance su...
Sita Ram & Ors vs.manoj Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA2752017 and C.M. Appl. No.9569/2017 (for stay) SITA RAM & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Alok Kumar and Mr. Amit Kr. (Mobile No.Singh, Advocates 9810127735). versus MANOJ KUMAR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Dhan Mohan and Ms. Tanu B. Mishra, Advocates for R-1 (Mobile No.9811180987). Mr. A.K. Dey, Advocate for R-2, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 (Mobile No.9540821003). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA % 1. ORDER2108.2018 This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 CPC is filed by the defendant No.1 in the suit, the father, impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 26.11.2016 by which the trial court has decreed the suit for partition filed by the respondent No.1/plaintiff/son with respect to property bearing No.RZ F-382, Raj Nagar-II, Palam Colony, New Delhi-110045 on a plot of land admeasuring 200 sq. yards.2. The only cause of action pleaded in the plaint by the respondent no.1/plaintiff was that the suit property was pu...
Poonam Sharma vs.the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
Judgment delivered on:21. 08.2018 $~58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4217/2018 POONAM SHARMA THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS versus ........ Petitioner Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. M.M. Khan with Ms. Faise, Advocates. Mr. Raghuvender Verma, APP for the State. Mr. Rajat Wadhwa with Mr. Raviyanay Singh, Advocates for the complainant. SI Ajay Kumar, PS Kirti Nagar. JUDGMENT2108.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.30369/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4217/2018 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.478/2013 under SectionsIPC, Police Station Kirti Nagar.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner accused had CRL.M.C. 4217/2018 Page 1 of 3 procured a false marriage certificate and threatened the complainant.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have settled ...
Man Mohan Diwan vs.govt.of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Order: August 21, 2018 + W.P.(C) 11928/2016 & C.M. 47041/2016 1. MAN MOHAN DIWAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. V.P.Rana & Ms. Pooja Wason, Advocates Versus GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Chirag Madan & Ms.Ravleen Sabharwal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) This petition has been listed today in terms of order of 15th May, 2018. With the consent of counsel for the parties, the date of 29th August, 2018 fixed in this petition is cancelled and it is taken up for hearing today itself.2. Impugned order of 29th July, 2016 (Annexure-A) rejects petitioners revision petition against Warrants of Possession issued in respect of petitioners lands by observing that petitioner has failed to challenge the conditional order of 27th September, 1999, which was made absolute on 18th July, 2000. W.P.(C) 11928/2016 Page 1 of 3 3. The grievance of petitioner is that the plea of execution proceed...
Murti Devi & Anr vs.nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. t August, 2018. MURTI DEVI & ANR RSA1152018 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Shekhar Prit Jha, Adv. versus NCT OF DELHI & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS CM No.33214/2018(for exemption) 1.2. Allowed subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. RSA1152018 & CM Nos. 33213/2018 (for condonation of delay of 20 days in filing) & 33215/2018(for condonation of delay of 10 days in re- filing) 3. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 impugns the judgment and decree [dated 1st March, 2018 in RCA No.60/2016 of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, North-West]. allowing the First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the respondent No.2 DDA against the judgment and decree [dated 4th June, 2016 in CS No.510/2013 of the Court of the Civil Judge, North]. allowing the suit filed by the two appellants for restraining the...
B Venkateshwara Rao vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 730/2018 & CRL.M.A. 2632/2018 Judgment delivered on:21. 08.2018 B VENKATESHWARA RAO versus STATE & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Gurpreet Singh and Ms.Aakash Lodha, Advs. For the Respondent: Mr.Raghuvinder Verma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Brijesh Kumar, P.S.Lodhi Colony. Mr.H.K.Chaturvedi, Adv. for R-2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2108.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns judgment dated 30.11.2017 passed by the Revisional Court whereby the revision petition impugning order dated 12.08.2016 of the Trial Court taking cognizance of the offence under Section 352/323/509 IPC has been dismissed.2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner points out that on the CRL.M.C. 730/2018 Page 1 of 4 complaint investigation was carried out by the prosecution and statement of several wi...
Kamlesh vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
$~2 & 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3014/2018 Judgment delivered on:21.08.2018 NARAYAN SINGH & ANR versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR + CRL.M.C. 3038/2018 KAMLESH STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner(s) : For the Respondent(s): Mr.Rajeshwar Dagar and Mr.Ravinder Hooda, Advs. for petitioners in Crl.M.C.3014/2018. Mr.Syed Hasan Isfahani, Adv. for petitioner in Crl.M.C.3038/2018. Mr.Raghuvinder Verma, Addl. PP for the State with SI B.K.Bharti, P.S.Jaffarpur Kalan. Mr.Syed Hasan Crl.M.C.3014/2018. Mr.Rajeshwar Dagar and Mr.Ravinder Hooda, Advs. for R-2 in Crl.M.C.3038/2018. Isfahani, Adv. for R-2 in CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2108.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.C. 3014/2018 & 3038/2018 Page 1 of 3 1.... Petitioners in Crl.M.C.3014/2018 seek quashing of FIR No.29/2012 under Sections 452/323/5IPC ...
r.p Sharma & Anr. Vs.prem Chand & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
$~19 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:21. t August, 2018 LPA2972017 & C.M.15228/2017 R.P SHARMA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Puneet Mittal, Sr. Adv. with versus Mr. Pradeep Purohit and Mr. Rupendra Pratap Singh, Advs. PREM CHAND & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Samrat Nigam and Mr. Shaurya Kuthiala, Advs. for R-1 with R-1 in person. Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Adv. for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 27.03.2017 wherein extensive directions have been given by the Single Judge for filing affidavit of assets, income and expenditure of the appellants herein and other Directors of respondent no.4 company.2. Necessary facts to be noticed for disposal of this appeal are that respondent no.1 (workman) was appointed as an Electrician by respondent no.5 company on 05.07.1986. The respondent no.1 (workman) claimed that his ser...
Sujata Kohli vs.registrar General, High Court of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:23. 11.2017 Judgment pronounced on:21. 08.2018 % + W.P.(C) 3157/2015 SUJATA KOHLI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Adv. along with petitioner-in-person. versus REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose with Mr. Rhishabh Jetley & Mr. Dhanjai Rana, Advs. for Delhi High Court. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Deboshree Mukherjee, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The petitioner, a senior Delhi Higher Judicial service (DHJS) officer, has preferred these proceedings under Article 226 of the WP(C) No.3157/2015 Page 1 Constitution, complaining violation of her fundamental right to equality before law by the adoption of a resolution by the Full Court of the Delhi High Court on 28.4.2009 evolving a new criteria for appointment to the position of District and Sessions Judge. The re...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »