Delhi Court August 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. Novateur Electrical & Digital Systems Pvt Ltd. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
$~11 to 19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"17th August, 2018 CRL.M.C. 3572/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS CRL.M.C. 3583/2016 CRL.M.C. 3582/2016 versus versus + M/S. NOVATEUR ELECTRICAL & DIGITAL SYSTEMS PVT LTD. ........ Petitioner STATE & ANR. + M/S. NOVATEUR ELECTRICAL & DIGITAL SYSTEMS PVT LTD. ........ Petitioner STATE & ORS. + M/S. NOVATEUR ELECTRICAL & DIGITAL SYSTEMS PVT LTD. ........ Petitioner STATE & ORS. + M/S. NOVATEUR ELECTRICAL & DIGITAL SYSTEMS PVT LTD. ..... Petitioner STATE & ANR. + M/S. NOVATEUR ELECTRICAL & DIGITAL SYSTEMS PVT LTD. ........ Petitioner STATE & ORS. versus versus versus CRL.M.C. 3584/2016 CRL.M.C. 3585/2016 ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS Crl. M.C. No.3572/2016 & conn.matters Page 1 of 5 CRL.M.C. 3587/2016 CRL.M.C. 3586/2016 versus + M/S. NOVATEUR ELECTRICAL & DIGITAL SYSTEMS PVT LTD. ........ Petitioner STATE & ORS. + M/S. NOVATEUR ELECTRICAL & DIGITAL SYSTEMS PVT LTD. ........ Petiti...
Sanjeev Dass vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % BAIL APPLN. 611/2018 Judgment delivered on:17. 08.2018 SANJEEV DASS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent : Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Mr. Raman Sahney and Mr. Rachit Sahney, Advs. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Ravinder Kumar % ORDER1708.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks anticipatory Bail in case FIR No.384 of 2017 under Sections 452/354/506/509 of the IPC Police Station Pandav Nagar, Delhi.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant who resided as a tenant in the property was assaulted by the petitioner. It is alleged that the complainant was in her house when she heard someone abusing from outside. On coming out, she found that the petitioner was hurling abuses and when she confronted him and asked him not to abuse he got annoyed and pushed her on wh...
Sainik Welfare Org – India vs.nehra Infrastructures & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
$~33 & 34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:17. h August, 2018 + + O.M.P. 88/2014 O.M.P. 89/2014 SAINIK WELFARE ORG INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. P. D. Prasad Rao, Mr. Satyavan Kudalwal and Mr. Atul Pandey, Advocates. (M:9920093284) versus NEHRA INFRASTRUCTURES & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kamal Nijhawan and Mr. Chirag Mudgal, Advocates. (M:9958571011) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) I.A. 2307/2018 & O.M.P. 88/2014 I.A. 2308/2018 & O.M.P. 89/2014 1. The present applications have been filed by the... Petitioner with the prayer that the Settlement Agreements dated 6th August, 2014, entered into between the... Petitioner and the... RESPONDENTS, in both matters, should be taken on record.2. The present Section 9 petitions were filed by the... Petitioner, which is a registered public trust (NGO) created under the provisions of the Charitable and Religious Trusts Act, 1920. The NGO has been established for the welfar...
Union of India & Anr. Vs.ishwar Dass
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:17. 08.2018 + W.P.(C) 8623/2018 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... PETITIONERS Through : Mr.Ashok Singh, Advocate. versus ISHWAR DASS Through : None. ..... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. By the present petition, the petitioners have sought quashing of the order dated 17.02.2015, passed in OA No.4286 of 2013 as also the order dated 23.01.2018, passed in Review Application No.259/2016, whereby the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, has allowed the Original Application (OA) filed by the respondent with a direction to the petitioners to re-determine the qualifying service of the respondent by counting 50% of his casual service and 100% of his substitute service as a store Khallasi and pay him the arrears with interest at the rate of 9% per annum within a period of two months. WP (C) No.8623/2018 Page 1 of 5 2. The brief facts of the cas...
Jagmohan @ Jaggu vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1286/2018 Judgment delivered on:16. 08.2018 JAGMOHAN@ JAGGU versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Jangra, Advocate. For the Respondent : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State. SI Rajbir Singh, PS Mundka. JUDGMENT1608.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.352/2017 under Section 307 IPC read with Sections 25/Arms Act.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant along with his brother and the petitioner and other friends were celebrating the release of the brother of the complainant from jail in another case.3. At night when they were drinking, it is contended, that there BAIL APPLN. 1286/2018 Page 1 of 3 was an altercation between the brother of the complainant as well as the petitioner. It is contended that the petitioner took out a co...
Rohtash & Ors. Vs.the State ( Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 08.2018 CRL.M.C. 4126/2018 ROHTASH & ORS ....... Petitioners versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Ms.Kavita Saini, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State. SI Virender Kumar, P.S.K.N.Katju Marg. Mr.Roshan Saini, Advocate for R-2. JUDGMENT1608.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.30055/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4126/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.69/2016 under Sections 498A/4IPC and Section 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station K.N.Katju Marg. CRL.M.C. 4126/2018 Page 1 of 3 2.3. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have reconciled their disputes and are amicably residing together as husband and wife.4. The re...
Larsen & Toubro Ltd. Vs.delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$-24 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h August, 2018 O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 328/2018 & IA109262018 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Atul Sharma, Mr.Ravi Varma, Mr.Suadat Kirmani, Mr.Abhinav Sharma & Mr.Lakshay Khanna, Advs. versus DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) In view of the order passed today by this Court in OMP(I)(Comm.) No.329/2018 titled Larsen & Toubro Ltd. vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. & Anr., the present petition and all pending applications are dismissed, with no order as to cost. A copy of the aforesaid order in OMP(I)(Comm.) No.329/2018 is placed below. NAVIN CHAWLA, J.AUGUST16 2018/rv OMP (I) (COMM.) 328/2018 Page 1 $-25 & 24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h August, 2018 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 329/2018 & IA109272018 (24) O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 328/2018 & IA109262018 LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. ....
Fahmida Anjum vs.government of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: August 16, 2018 W.P.(C) 4730/2018 & CMs 18166-67/2018 FAHMIDA ANJUM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Bajaj, Mr. Soayib Qureshi, Ms. Aakanksha Nehra, Ms. Kritika Sachdeva and Ms. Shourya Mittal, Advocates Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI Through: Ms. Ruchika Rathi, Advocate .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioners application for allotment of alternate plot in lieu of acquired land, was recommended on 31st August, 2017 by the Recommending Committee to the Competent Authority. Impugned order of 28th February, 2018 (Annexure P-1) reveals that the Competent Authority/Committee has rejected petitioners application for allotment of alternate plot on the ground that the property in question, i.e., two rooms, is owned by petitioner and is with the tenants, who are residing there.2. To assail impugned order, learned counsel for petitioner has drawn attention of this Court to MCD record (A...
High Court of Delhi Through Registrar General vs.rk Jain and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~13 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 981/2017 & CM No.4497/2017 HIGH COURT OF DELHI THROUGH REGISTRAR GENERAL ........ Petitioner RK JAIN AND ANR Through Mr Jayant K. Mehta, Ms Suveni Bhagat, Mr Rahul Kukreti, Advocates. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr Rajveer Singh, Mr Sameer Gupta, Advocates for R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1608.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 1. 16.08.2016 passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter CIC), whereby the CIC has directed the petitioner to make available all orders passed by the First Appellate Authorities under Section 19 (1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereafter the RTI Act) as well as all replies furnished under the Right in response to applications under the said Act, on its website within a defined time frame. to Information Act 2. This Court has reservations as to whether such information was liable for disclosure unde...
Prabhat Agarwal vs.deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DATE OF JUDGMENT:16. 08.2018 + W.P.(C) 8907/2008 PRABHAT AGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.C.S.Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Prakash Kumar, Ms.Pushpa Sharma and Mr.Uma Shankar, Advocates. Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The writ petitioner (hereafterassessee is aggrieved by a re- assessment notice issued to him, under Sectionof the Income Tax Act, 1961, by the respondent (hereafter revenue) on 25th May 2007, for the assessment year (AY) 2004-05; he seeks directions for the quashing of that notice.2. Briefly, the case relates to assessment for AY200405; the assessee had filed his original return of income on 25/10/2004 declaring `18,00,16,650/- including income of `60,00,000/- chargeable at normal rates and the balance from long term capital gains. The income f...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »