Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Deepa Arya vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 04.2018 CRL.M.C. 1692/2018 & Crl. M.A. 6105/2018 DEEPA ARYA versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : : Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. and Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mehmood Pracha, Mr. R.H.A. Sikander, Mr. Mohd. Danish, Mr. Amit Sharma, Mr. R.K. Saini, Mr. Sitab Ali Chaudhary, Mr. Azharuddin Chaudhary, Mr. Tushar Agarwal, Mr. Prateek Gupta and Mr. Karan Khanuja, Advs. Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP Mr. Promod Singh Kushwah, DCP/ Spl. Cell Mr. Govind Sharma, ACP/Spl. Cell Inspr. Mukesh Kumar, Spl. Cell CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1004.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. It is noticed that the name of the petitioner has been incorrectly shown in the cause list as Deepa Arora. The record reveals that the petitioners correct name is Deep...
State Bank of India vs.satish Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: April 10, 2018 + W.P. (C) 7237/2007 + W.P. (C) 7238/2007 + W.P. (C) 7239/2007 + W.P. (C) 7240/2007 + W.P. (C) 7241/2007 + W.P. (C) 7242/2007 + W.P. (C) 7243/2007 + W.P. (C) 7244/2007 + W.P. (C) 7245/2007 + W.P. (C) 7246/2007 + W.P. (C) 7247/2007 STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates versus DEVESH KUMAR SHARMA KEDAR NATH SATISH KUMAR MUKESH KUMAR LALIT SHARMA RAMESH LAL RAM KISHAN SHARMA VIJAY KUMAR SINGH SANJAY KUMAR RAM KUMAR RAM CHET .....Respondents + W.P. (C) 8739/2009 Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate RAM CHET & ORS. .....Petitioners W.P. (C) 7237/2007 & other connected matters Page 1 of 13 1. Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate versus STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Imp...
State Bank of India vs.ram Chet
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: April 10, 2018 + W.P. (C) 7237/2007 + W.P. (C) 7238/2007 + W.P. (C) 7239/2007 + W.P. (C) 7240/2007 + W.P. (C) 7241/2007 + W.P. (C) 7242/2007 + W.P. (C) 7243/2007 + W.P. (C) 7244/2007 + W.P. (C) 7245/2007 + W.P. (C) 7246/2007 + W.P. (C) 7247/2007 STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates versus DEVESH KUMAR SHARMA KEDAR NATH SATISH KUMAR MUKESH KUMAR LALIT SHARMA RAMESH LAL RAM KISHAN SHARMA VIJAY KUMAR SINGH SANJAY KUMAR RAM KUMAR RAM CHET .....Respondents + W.P. (C) 8739/2009 Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate RAM CHET & ORS. .....Petitioners W.P. (C) 7237/2007 & other connected matters Page 1 of 13 1. Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate versus STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Imp...
Union of India vs.ashok Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~62 * + W.P.(C) 3500/2018 & CM Nos.13825-27/2018 UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Jasmeet Singh, Advocate ASHOK KUMAR versus Through: None ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI The petitioner/Union of India is aggrieved by the judgment ORDER1004.2018 % 1. dated 16.01.2017, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal allowing O.A. No.4141/2015, filed by the respondent herein, who is presently working on the post of Additional Commissioner in the Income Tax, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, praying inter alia for issuing directions to the respondent/UOI to promote him to the post of Commissioner, Income Tax in terms of the promotion order dated 16.09.2015, with effect from the date when his juniors were promoted, with all consequential benefits.2. The facts of the case as emerge from the records are that on 05.09.1993, the respondent had joined service as an Assistant Comm...
Jagveeri & Anr vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
$~9 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. 04.2018 FAO642017 JAGVEERI & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Shyam Singh Sisodia, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) 1. This appeal impugns an order dated 10.11.2016 dismissing the appellants claim for compensation from the Railways for the demise of their son Mr. Rahul Jatav in a rail accident. On 19.10.2015, Mr. Rahul Jatav was travelling in Kashi Vishwanath Express from New Delhi to Hapur, Uttar Pradesh alongwith his friend Mr. Wasim. On the way, near Mehrauli, Ghaziabad (UP), due to a sudden jerk in the train, he fell down and suffered grievous injuries. Later, he was stated to be taken to Maxwell Multispeciality Hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, where he was declared dead.2. The Railways registered the accident and initiated an inquiry. The crux of the DRM Report was that the deceased fell down from the train due to h...
Container Corporation of India Ltd vs.titagarh Wagons Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:10. 04.2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 312/2016 & IA No.8092/2016 CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD ........ Petitioner versus TITAGARH WAGONS LTD. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr M.M. Kalra and Ms Sonali Kumar. For the Respondent : Ms Maneesha Dhir, Ms Sharmistha Ghosh ..... Respondent and Mr Mahipal Singh. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner (hereafter CONCOR) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning the arbitral award dated 01.03.2016 (hereafter the impugned award) delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted by Justice R. P. Gupta (Retired), Presiding Arbitrator, Shri A. K. Srivastava and Shri K. K. Sood. The impugned award was rendered by majority with one of the arbitrators, Shri K. K. Sood, entering a dissenting opinion. O.M.P. (COMM) 312/2016 Page 1 of 15 2. The impugn...
Sumit Kumar Dahiya vs.the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
$~5 to 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 04.2018 BAIL APPLN. 871/2017 SHASHWAT & ANR versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 942/2017 + + RANBIR SINGH versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI BAIL APPLN. 979/2017 MAHABIR SINGH versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI BAIL APPLN. 982/2017 SUMIT KUMAR DAHIYA versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr.Puneet Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr Neeraj Kumar, Advocate. BAIL APPLN. 871/2017,942/2017, 979/2017 & 982/2017 Page 1 For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the State. SI Om Prakash , PS Hauz Khas. Mr P.K.Dubey with Ms Vasundhara Nagrath, Advocates for the complainants. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1004.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The... Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR ...
State Bank of India vs.ram Kishan Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: April 10, 2018 + W.P. (C) 7237/2007 + W.P. (C) 7238/2007 + W.P. (C) 7239/2007 + W.P. (C) 7240/2007 + W.P. (C) 7241/2007 + W.P. (C) 7242/2007 + W.P. (C) 7243/2007 + W.P. (C) 7244/2007 + W.P. (C) 7245/2007 + W.P. (C) 7246/2007 + W.P. (C) 7247/2007 STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates versus DEVESH KUMAR SHARMA KEDAR NATH SATISH KUMAR MUKESH KUMAR LALIT SHARMA RAMESH LAL RAM KISHAN SHARMA VIJAY KUMAR SINGH SANJAY KUMAR RAM KUMAR RAM CHET .....Respondents + W.P. (C) 8739/2009 Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate RAM CHET & ORS. .....Petitioners W.P. (C) 7237/2007 & other connected matters Page 1 of 13 1. Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate versus STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Imp...
Mrs. Urmila Verma vs.director of Education and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 10, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3494/2018 & CMs 13795-96/2018 MRS. URMILA VERMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mohd. Asad Khan and Mr. Mrinal Kumar Sharma, Advocates versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ANR. Through: Nemo .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1.... Petitioner stands promoted from the post of Assistant Teacher to Trained Graduate Teacher (Sanskrit) vide order of 31st October, 2016 (Annexure P-15).... Petitioners request for grant of pecuniary benefits of the post of TGT (Sanskrit) w.e.f. the year 2013 has been turned down by respondent-School vide order of 3rd July, 2017 (Annexure P-22) wherein it is noted that the Departmental Promotion Committee in its meeting of 7th June, 2016 has recommended petitioners promotion from the post of Assistant Teacher to TGT (Sanskrit).... Petitioners prayer for promotion from July, 2013 has been considered and rejected by the Competent Authority because the benef...
Shahadab vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1349/2017 Judgment delivered on:10. 04.2018 SHAHADAB versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr. Jitender Tyagi and Mr. Rishi Bhardwaj, Advs. Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Addl. PP for the State with CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1004.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.288/2014 under Section 302/307/120B/34 of the IPC registered at Police Station Amar Colony, New Delhi.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that three eye witnesses namely, Mohd. Nawab, Mohd. Zuber and Mohd. Jakir have already been examined and have not supported the case of the prosecution and have failed to identify the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.04.2014. BAIL APPLN. 1349/2017 Page 1 of 2 3. Without commenting upon the merits o...