Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs.petroleum Workers Union
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 11, 2018 (i) + W.P.(C) 22957/2005 INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Navet & Mr. Kushagra Pandit, Advocates Versus PETROLEUM WORKERS UNION Through: Mr. B.K. Singh, Advocate ..... Respondent (ii) + W.P.(C) 22992/2005 INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Navet & Mr. Kushagra Pandit, Advocates Versus GENERAL SECRETARY, BHARITYA SHRAMJIVI SANGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. B.K. Singh, Advocate (iii) + W.P.(C) 6915/2010 INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Navet & Mr. Kushagra Pandit, Advocates Versus GENERAL SECRETARY, BHARTIYA SHRAMJIVI SANGH Through: Mr. Sunil Dwivedi, Mr. Puneet Saini & Mr. Bimal Prakash, Advocates ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 22957/2005 W.P.(C) 22992/2005 W.P.(C) 6915/2010 Page 1 of 5 1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR (ORAL) JUDGMENT The challenge to the impugned Award of 19th September, 2005 in W.P.(C) 22957/...
M/S Khushi Ram Behari Lal vs.m/s Whitefields International Pvt. Ltd. & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
$~4 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM (M) 283/2016 Decided on:-"11th April, 2018 M/S KHUSHI RAM BEHARI LAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla & Mr. Ajay Amitabh Saran, Advs. versus M/S WHITEFIELDS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. & ANR. Through: ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Akhil Schar, Mr. Nikhil Chawla & Ms. Gayatri Nandwani, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is the plaintiff of the civil suit (TM072013) which was filed sometime in 2013 initially against the first respondent for reliefs in the nature of permanent injunction for restraint order against passing off or infringement of the trademark and the copyright of the plaintiff besides other reliefs in the nature of delivery up, rendition of accounts etc., the cause of action claimed being with regard to the use of trademark/label Taj Mahal with device of Taj Mahal of copyright whereof the plaintiff claims to be the owner. As per ...
M. Vs.v.s.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~27 * % + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 73/2018, CM APPL. 13930/2018 (exemption), CM APPL. 13931/2018 (Stay) and CM APPL. 13932/2018 (Condonation of delay 35 days in filing of appeal) Decided on:11. 04.2018 M. V.S. ..... Appellant Through: Mr Satish Kumar, Adv. Versus ..... Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 assails the judgment and decree dated 19.01.20018, passed by the learned Family Court, Dwarka, New Delhi, in HMA No.817/2017, titled as V.S. vs. M., whereby the petition for divorce instituted on behalf of the respondent/husband was decreed and the marriage between the parties was dissolved.2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant at length and perused the Trial Court record, it is evident that the respondent/husband has been able to successfully establish the ...
Manjeet Singh vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 822/2002 & CRL.M.A.2996/2003 Decided on:11. h April 2018 Reserved on:22. d March 2018 MANOJ & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Vikram Singh Panwar and Mr. Vikas Walia, Advocates. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State. With CRL.A. 836/2002 RAM NIWAS & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advocates for appellant no.1 Mr. Manoj Kumar Ohri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Varun Tyagi, Mr. Bharat Gupta, Mr. Nawab Singh Jaglan, Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Raj, Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Mr. Vishesh Chauhan and Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Advocates for Appellant Nos. 3 and 4. Versus + STATE OF NCT OF DELHI CRL.A Nos. 822/2002, 836/2002, 929/2002 & 937/2002 ..... Respondent Page 1 of 34 Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State. + CRL.A. 929/2002 With SURANJAN SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikram Singh Panwar and Mr. Vikas Walia, Advocates. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........
Binoy Kumar Jha vs.rama Arjun Retail Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % BINOY KUMAR JHA RFA No.308/2018 11th April, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate. RAMA ARJUN RETAIL PVT. LTD. versus ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.14055/2018 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. No.14054/2018 (for condonation of delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 55 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.308/2018 and C.M. No.14053/2018 (stay) 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the appellant/defendant impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 12.10.2017 by which RFA No.308/2018 Page 1 of 10 trial court has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the appellant/defendant in an Order XXXVII CPC suit filed by the respondent/pla...
Heera Lal vs.dav Public School & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Order: April 11, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3516/2018 & C.M. 13863/2018 1. HEERA LAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate Versus DAV PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchika Gupta & Mr. Bhaskar Chhakara, Advocates for respondents No.3 & 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Quashing of Suspension Order of 12th November, 2014 with ORDER (ORAL) consequential relief is sought by petitioner, who claims to have made various Representations followed by a Legal Notice of 26th December, 2017 (Annexure-L) to respondents.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that there is no response to the legal notice (Annexure L).3. Despite service of advance notice, none has appeared on behalf of respondent-School.4. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition and application with direction to respondent- School to consider Legal Notice of 26th December, 2017 (Annex...
Ram Niwas & Ors. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 822/2002 & CRL.M.A.2996/2003 Decided on:11. h April 2018 Reserved on:22. d March 2018 MANOJ & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Vikram Singh Panwar and Mr. Vikas Walia, Advocates. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State. With CRL.A. 836/2002 RAM NIWAS & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advocates for appellant no.1 Mr. Manoj Kumar Ohri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Varun Tyagi, Mr. Bharat Gupta, Mr. Nawab Singh Jaglan, Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Raj, Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Mr. Vishesh Chauhan and Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Advocates for Appellant Nos. 3 and 4. Versus + STATE OF NCT OF DELHI CRL.A Nos. 822/2002, 836/2002, 929/2002 & 937/2002 ..... Respondent Page 1 of 34 Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State. + CRL.A. 929/2002 With SURANJAN SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikram Singh Panwar and Mr. Vikas Walia, Advocates. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........
Hindustan Unilever Ltd. Vs.reckitt Benckiser (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
$~52 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI5 Date of Judgment:11. h April, 2018 FAO (OS) (COMM) 62/2018 & C.M.13949/2018 (stay) & 13950/2018 (for additional documents) HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sudhir Chandra and Mr.Akhil Sibal, Senior Advocates with Mr.Ajay Bhargava, Ms.Vanita Bhargava, Mr.Nishad Nadkarni, Mr.Ankur Sangal, Ms.Sucheta Roy, Ms.Pragya Mishra and Ms.Richa Bhargava, Advocates. versus RECKITT BENCKISER (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Chander M.Lall, Senior Advocate with Mr.Jawahar Lal, Ms.Nancy Roy and Mr.Rupin Bahl, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an appeal filed by the appellant herein (defendant in the suit) against the order dated 06.04.2018 passed in a suit for permanent injunction and damages on account of disparagement and unfair trade practices instituted by the respondent herein (plaintiff in the suit).2. At the outset, it may be noted t...
Rational Intellectual Holdings Ltd. Vs.mr. Sunny Karira, & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on :11. 04.2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 446/2017 RATIONAL INTELLECTUAL HOLDINGS LTD. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS MR. SUNNY KARIRA, & ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent :Mr Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Senior Advocate With Mr Ashish Kabra, Mr Brijesh Kumar. :Mr P. Sinha with Ms Reshmi Rea Sinha And Mr Rudra Dutta, Advocates for R-1. Mr Neel Mason and Ms P. Vennela for R-2. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner, a company organized under the laws of the Isle of Man, has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning the arbitral award dated 21.08.2017 (hereafter the impugned award) delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted under the .IN Dispute Resolution Policy and Rules of Procedure framed thereunder. O.M.P. (COMM) 446/2017 Page 1 of 16 2. By the impugned orde...
M/S Rmc Ready Mix (India) vs.m/s Clarion Projects Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
$~CP-17 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:11. 04.2018 CO.PET. 759/2014 and CA No.4921/2016, 99/2017 M/S RMC READY MIX (INDIA) Through M.V.K.Monga, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus M/S CLARION PROJECTS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Paritosh Budhiraja and Mr.Vimal Dubey, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. This petition is filed under Sections 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking to wind up the respondent Company. It has been pleaded that the petitioner supplied to the respondent Ready Mix Concrete against various orders. It is pleaded that a balance of Rs.9,26,252/- is due to the petitioner as on 12.03.2013. Reliance is placed on two balance confirmation letters said to have been executed by the respondent whereby the respondent has confirmed the balance due to be Rs.9,26,252/- as on 28.02.2013 and also on 15.10.2013. It has also been pleaded that the respondent issued three cheques dated 08.03.2013, 15...
- ‹ Prev
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- Next ›
- Last »