Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Suman Ram vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 11, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3551/2018 & C.M. 14023/2018 1. SUMAN RAM Through: Mr. Pavan Kumar, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vikram Jetly, Central Government Standing Counsel for respondent No.1-UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner in this petition, claims that she was appointed on compassionate ground and has rendered service of about 16 years. It is case of petitioner that she had sought regularization of her service vide various Representations and the last Representation was made by her to second respondent on 9th March, 2017. The grievance of petitioner is that her Representation has not been dealt with by second respondent.2. Despite service of advance notice, none has appeared on behalf of second respondent.3. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition with permission to petition...
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd vs.satveeri & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:11. h April, 2018 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Birjesh Bagga, Advocate $~31 * % + MAC.APP. 8/2018 & CM1962018 SATVEERI & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Amit Kumar Pandey, Mr.Nikhil Tripathi, Advocate for respondents no.1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.51,96,200/- has been awarded to respondents no.1 to 3.2. The accident dated 31st August, 2015 resulted in the death of Krishan. The deceased was aged 52 years and was working with Seeds Corporation Ltd. and was earning Rs.43,332/- per month. The deceased was survived by his widow, daughter and son who claimed compensation before the Claims Tribunal.3. The Claims Tribunal took the income of the deceased as Rs.43,332/- per month, added 15% towards future prospects, deducted 1/3rd towards his personal expenses and app...
c.a. Ramesh Babu vs.reebok India Company
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 148/2018 and IA No.4758/2018 & IA No.4759/2018 C.A. RAMESH BABU ........ Petitioner Through: Ms Joseph Aristotle S., Advocate. REEBOK INDIA COMPANY versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr Abhinav Vasisth, Senior Advocate with Mr Niraj Singh, Mr Alok Srivastav, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1104.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act), inter alia, impugning the arbitral award dated 31.12.2017 (hereafter the impugned award) delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted of a sole arbitrator, Justice V.B Gupta (Retired), (hereafter the Arbitral Tribunal).2. The impugned award was rendered in the context of disputes that have arisen between the parties in respect of the Franchise Agreement dated 17.08.2006 (hereafter the Agreement) and the Settlement Agreement dated 27.02.2013 (hereafter the Set...
Shashwat & Anr. Vs.the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
$~5 to 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 04.2018 BAIL APPLN. 871/2017 SHASHWAT & ANR versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 942/2017 + + RANBIR SINGH versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI BAIL APPLN. 979/2017 MAHABIR SINGH versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI BAIL APPLN. 982/2017 SUMIT KUMAR DAHIYA versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr.Puneet Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr Neeraj Kumar, Advocate. BAIL APPLN. 871/2017,942/2017, 979/2017 & 982/2017 Page 1 For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the State. SI Om Prakash , PS Hauz Khas. Mr P.K.Dubey with Ms Vasundhara Nagrath, Advocates for the complainants. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1004.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The... Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR ...
State Bank of India vs.mukesh Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: April 10, 2018 + W.P. (C) 7237/2007 + W.P. (C) 7238/2007 + W.P. (C) 7239/2007 + W.P. (C) 7240/2007 + W.P. (C) 7241/2007 + W.P. (C) 7242/2007 + W.P. (C) 7243/2007 + W.P. (C) 7244/2007 + W.P. (C) 7245/2007 + W.P. (C) 7246/2007 + W.P. (C) 7247/2007 STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates versus DEVESH KUMAR SHARMA KEDAR NATH SATISH KUMAR MUKESH KUMAR LALIT SHARMA RAMESH LAL RAM KISHAN SHARMA VIJAY KUMAR SINGH SANJAY KUMAR RAM KUMAR RAM CHET .....Respondents + W.P. (C) 8739/2009 Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate RAM CHET & ORS. .....Petitioners W.P. (C) 7237/2007 & other connected matters Page 1 of 13 1. Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate versus STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Imp...
Ram Chet & Ors. Vs.state Bank of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: April 10, 2018 + W.P. (C) 7237/2007 + W.P. (C) 7238/2007 + W.P. (C) 7239/2007 + W.P. (C) 7240/2007 + W.P. (C) 7241/2007 + W.P. (C) 7242/2007 + W.P. (C) 7243/2007 + W.P. (C) 7244/2007 + W.P. (C) 7245/2007 + W.P. (C) 7246/2007 + W.P. (C) 7247/2007 STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates versus DEVESH KUMAR SHARMA KEDAR NATH SATISH KUMAR MUKESH KUMAR LALIT SHARMA RAMESH LAL RAM KISHAN SHARMA VIJAY KUMAR SINGH SANJAY KUMAR RAM KUMAR RAM CHET .....Respondents + W.P. (C) 8739/2009 Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate RAM CHET & ORS. .....Petitioners W.P. (C) 7237/2007 & other connected matters Page 1 of 13 1. Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate versus STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Imp...
Oriflame India Private Limited vs.deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
$~5 to 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:10. 04.2018 + ITA8122017 ORIFLAME INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent + ITA8132017 ORIFLAME INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX..... Respondent + ITA8252017 ORIFLAME INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ..... Respondent Present: Mr.Himanshu Sinha and Mr. Bhuwan Dhoopar, Advocates for petitioner. Mr.Deepak Anand, Jr.Standing Counsel for Revenue. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT ITA8122017 & connected appeals Page 1 of 2 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The appeals are allowed.2. For reasons, the judgment dated 10.4.2018 in ITA8112017 may be referred to. APRIL10 2018 ndn S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J A. K. CHAWLA, J ITA8122017 & connected appeals Page 2 of 2...
Jagmohan Arora vs.raj Kumari
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + JAGMOHAN ARORA CRL.REV.P. 293/2018 & Crl. M.A. 6168-70/2018 Judgment delivered on:10. 04.2018 ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent versus RAJ KUMARI Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : None. : None. JUDGMENT1004.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. None appears for the petitioner. The matter was listed on 09.04.2018 when counsel for the petitioner made detailed submissions. When this court was not inclined to accept the present petition and was in the process of dictating the judgment, a pass over was requested on the ground that senior counsel would be addressing arguments. Thereafter when the matter reached later in the day, request for adjournment was made, which was acceded to, and the matter was kept for today.2. Today, at lunch time a request for adjournment was made on the CRL.REV.P. 293-2018 Page 1 of 4 ground that counsel was not available, sa...
Narcotics Control Bureau vs.saad Ansari & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 220/2018 Decided on:10. h April, 2018 NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. P.C. Aggarwal, Advocate versus SAAD ANSARI & ORS. Represented by: None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.6308/2018 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.L.P. 220/2018 1. Aggrieved vide judgment dated 25th September, 2017, whereby the Learned Additional Sessions Judge acquitted Respondent No.1 Saad Ansari for the offences punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) read with Section 28 of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short 'NDPS Act') and Section 29/20(b)(ii)(C) NDPS Act and Respondent No.2 Sonam Dava for the offences punishable Section 20 (b)(ii)(C) and Section 29 of NDPS Act, petitioner has preferred the present leave petition.2. Briefly stated, prosecution case is that on 10th January, 2013 at about 10:00 A.M., a secret information was ...
State Bank of India vs.kedar Nath
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: April 10, 2018 + W.P. (C) 7237/2007 + W.P. (C) 7238/2007 + W.P. (C) 7239/2007 + W.P. (C) 7240/2007 + W.P. (C) 7241/2007 + W.P. (C) 7242/2007 + W.P. (C) 7243/2007 + W.P. (C) 7244/2007 + W.P. (C) 7245/2007 + W.P. (C) 7246/2007 + W.P. (C) 7247/2007 STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates versus DEVESH KUMAR SHARMA KEDAR NATH SATISH KUMAR MUKESH KUMAR LALIT SHARMA RAMESH LAL RAM KISHAN SHARMA VIJAY KUMAR SINGH SANJAY KUMAR RAM KUMAR RAM CHET .....Respondents + W.P. (C) 8739/2009 Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate RAM CHET & ORS. .....Petitioners W.P. (C) 7237/2007 & other connected matters Page 1 of 13 1. Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate versus STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Imp...