Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
J vs.r
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:9. h April, 2018 + MAT.APP. 62/2011 & C.M. Nos. 16979/2011, 19900/2016, 28099/2016 and 5315/2017 R J ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Reena Jain Malhotra, Advocate along with petitioner present in person versus Through: Ms. Vandana Sharma, ..... Respondent Advocate along with respondent present in person + MAT.APP. 69/2011 J Through: Ms. Vandana Sharma, ........ Petitioner Advocate along with petitioner present in person R versus Through: Ms. Reena Jain Malhotra, ..... Respondent Advocate along with respondent present in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 J and R got married on 03rd July, 1978 and two children were born out of their wedlock, namely a daughter, Pooja on 29th October, 1980 and a son, Raghav on 04th September, 1983. On 29th November, 2002, J instituted a petition for dissolution of marriage MAT. APP. NOS.62/2011 & 69/2011 Page 1 of 24 on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the...
Rajendra Pal Singh & Ors vs.harender Singh & Ors (Universal Sompo Gen ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
$~16 & 17 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:09. h April, 2018 + MAC.APP. 583/2017 & CM No.24259/2017 16 UNIVERSAL SOMPO GEN. INS. CO. LTD...... Appellant RAJENDRA PAL SINGH & ORS. versus Through: Mr. Mohammad Mustafa, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.S. Kanwar, Adv. for R1 to R4. + MAC.APP. 967/2017 17 RAJENDRA PAL SINGH & ORS versus Through: Mr. J.S. Kanwar, Adv. ..... Appellants HARENDER SINGH & ORS (UNIVERSAL SOMPO GEN INSURANCE CO LTD ) ..Respondents Through: Mr. Mohammad Mustafa, Adv. for R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The parties have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby the compensation of Rs.62,24,103/- has been awarded to the claimants. The appellant in MAC.APP.583/2017 is seeking reduction of the award amount whereas the appellants in MAC.APP.967/2017 are seeking enhancement of the award amount. MAC. APP. NOs.583/2017 & 967/2017 Page 1 of 5 2. The accident dated 13th September, 2015 resulted in the death o...
Atlanta Limited vs.uoi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:06. 02.2018 Pronounced on:09. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) 10854/2017 ATLANTA LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Chirag M. Shroff and Ms. Neha Sangwan, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr.Kavindra Gill and Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tewari, Advs. for UOI. Ms. Gunjan Jain, Mr. Mukesh Kumar and Mr. Simranjeet Singh, Advs. for NHAI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The writ petitioner is aggrieved by clause 2.1.19 of the tender conditions stipulated by the second respondent, National Highway Authority of India (NHAI in short) and impugns it as arbitrary.2. The facts in brief are that the petitioner is incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, and has a diversified work portfolio: Engineering, Procurement, Construction (EPC) & Realty, involved in executing Public Private Partnership (PPP) Inf...
Poonam Taneja vs.mmtc Lmited and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 09, 2018 W.P.(C) 10575/2017 & CM432962017 POONAM TANEJA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Samdarshi Sanay, Advocate with petitioner in person Versus MMTC LMITED AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of Memorandum of Charge of 6th April, 2017 (Annexure P-1 colly.) and order of 1st September, 2017 vide which Inquiry Officer was appointed is sought in this petition by petitioner, who is working as Chief Manager with first respondent.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that although petitioner has a good case on merits, but petitioner would be satisfied if it is directed that the Inquiry is concluded within a period of six months from today, so that petitioner may not lose out on promotion as her case for promotion was kept in sealed cover in February, 2018. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner had sought documents fr...
R vs.j
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:9. h April, 2018 + MAT.APP. 62/2011 & C.M. Nos. 16979/2011, 19900/2016, 28099/2016 and 5315/2017 R J ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Reena Jain Malhotra, Advocate along with petitioner present in person versus Through: Ms. Vandana Sharma, ..... Respondent Advocate along with respondent present in person + MAT.APP. 69/2011 J Through: Ms. Vandana Sharma, ........ Petitioner Advocate along with petitioner present in person R versus Through: Ms. Reena Jain Malhotra, ..... Respondent Advocate along with respondent present in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 J and R got married on 03rd July, 1978 and two children were born out of their wedlock, namely a daughter, Pooja on 29th October, 1980 and a son, Raghav on 04th September, 1983. On 29th November, 2002, J instituted a petition for dissolution of marriage MAT. APP. NOS.62/2011 & 69/2011 Page 1 of 24 on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the...
Universal Sompo Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd vs.rajendra Pal Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
$~16 & 17 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:09. h April, 2018 + MAC.APP. 583/2017 & CM No.24259/2017 16 UNIVERSAL SOMPO GEN. INS. CO. LTD...... Appellant RAJENDRA PAL SINGH & ORS. versus Through: Mr. Mohammad Mustafa, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.S. Kanwar, Adv. for R1 to R4. + MAC.APP. 967/2017 17 RAJENDRA PAL SINGH & ORS versus Through: Mr. J.S. Kanwar, Adv. ..... Appellants HARENDER SINGH & ORS (UNIVERSAL SOMPO GEN INSURANCE CO LTD ) ..Respondents Through: Mr. Mohammad Mustafa, Adv. for R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The parties have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby the compensation of Rs.62,24,103/- has been awarded to the claimants. The appellant in MAC.APP.583/2017 is seeking reduction of the award amount whereas the appellants in MAC.APP.967/2017 are seeking enhancement of the award amount. MAC. APP. NOs.583/2017 & 967/2017 Page 1 of 5 2. The accident dated 13th September, 2015 resulted in the death o...
M/S Harry & Sonia Salon Pvt Ltd & Anr. Vs.the State Govt of Nct of Del ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :9. h APRIL, 2018 M/S HARRY & SONIA SALON PVT LTD & ANR. CRL.REV.P. 146/2018 Through : Mr.Gurpratap Singh, Advocate. ....... Petitioners versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through : Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP. Mr.K.S.Sharma, Advocate with Mr.Raj K.Varshney, Advocate for R2 along with R2 in person. ....... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG + S.P.GARG, J.(Oral) CRL.M.A.No.6273/2018 1. Since the matter has been settled between the parties, the file is taken up today.2.3. The application stands disposed of. The date already fixed in the matter i.e. 20.07.2018 stands cancelled. CRL.REV.P. 146/2018 1. The petitioner was convicted under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act by a judgment dated 01.02.2017 and was Crl.Rev.P.146/2018 Page 1 of 3 sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for eight months with fine `6 lac. The said order was challenged in Crl.A. 106/2017; it came to be dismissed. The appellant was tak...
S vs.r
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:09. h April, 2018 FAO3512013 & C.M. Appl. Nos.25186/2016 S R Through: Mr. Prashanto Chandra Sen, Sr. Adv. ..... Appellant with Mr. Shivanshu Singh and Mr. Sanjay Kothiyal, Advs. versus Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with ..... Respondent Mr. Muhammad Ali Khan, Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Mr. Jaspal Singh, Mr. Omar Hoda, Ms. Namrah Nasir and Ms. Karishma Thakur, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The appellant has challenged the judgment dated 30th July, 2013 whereby the learned Trial Court dissolved the marriage between the parties by a decree of divorce on the ground of desertion under Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955.2. The respondent instituted a petition for dissolution of marriage on the ground of desertion on various averments inter alia that the parties were married according to Hindu rites and ceremonies on 10th June, 1987, they were blessed with a daughter, named Vardha on 24th ...
M/S Aditya Industries Through Its Proprietor Mrs Kusum Ghildiyal vs.ad ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Pronouncement:09. 04.2018 M/S ADITYA INDUSTRIES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MRS KUSUM GHILDIYAL Through: Mr.Prem Kumar, Adv. versus ........ Petitioner ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr.Abhinav Tyagi, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Satyakam, ASC with Mr. Shaswat Parihar, Adv. for R-2 and Mr.Dheeraj Kumar, Jr.Asstt. C/o SDM, Sarita Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J (ORAL) CM. APPL. 13602/2018 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 3443/2018 2. The challenge in this petition is laid to the letter dated 23.11.2015, issued by respondent No.1 and final notice dated 25.01.2016 issued under Section 136 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954.3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that this is a case of mistaken identity as the recovery notice has been directed against M/s. Aditya Industries having its registered office at 605, Rohit Hou...
Rajesh @ Sudama vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-07-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 07, 2018 CRL.A. 20/2014 RAJESH @ SUDAMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ajay Verma and Ms.Sudha Reddy, Advocates STATE versus Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, Additional Public ..... Respondent Prosecutor with Insp.Vipin Kumar and SI Ramesh Kumar, PS Sultan Puri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR SUNIL GAUR, J.1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned judgment of 4th October, 2013 holds appellant guilty of the offence of murdering his wife with a knife at his house in the afternoon of 28th August, 2012. Vide impugned order of 19th October, 2013, appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life with fine of `10,000/- for the offence under Section 302 of IPC and in default of payment of fine, it has been directed by Trial Court that appellant shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month. Rishi (PW-13) is the first informant, at whose instance, the police machinery was set into...
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »