Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Delhi Development Authority vs.k. R. Anand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OMP (COMM) 377/2017 & IAs 12254/2017, 184/2018, 3152/2018 Reserved on:6. h March, 2018 Date of decision :10. h April, 2018 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Kanika Singh and Mr. Rishi Vohra, Advocates. versus K. R. ANAND ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajender Agarwal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 The petitioner by way of this present petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), challenges the Arbitral Award dated 09.06.2017 passed by the Sole Arbitrator awarding certain claims in favour of the respondent.2. The challenge in the petition was confined to the grant of Claim Nos.4,5,6,7 and 8. However, after notice of the petition was issued to the respondent, the petitioner by way of I.A. No.3152/2018, sought leave of this Court to amend this petition so as to also challenge the Award o...
State Bank of India vs.devesh Kumar Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: April 10, 2018 + W.P. (C) 7237/2007 + W.P. (C) 7238/2007 + W.P. (C) 7239/2007 + W.P. (C) 7240/2007 + W.P. (C) 7241/2007 + W.P. (C) 7242/2007 + W.P. (C) 7243/2007 + W.P. (C) 7244/2007 + W.P. (C) 7245/2007 + W.P. (C) 7246/2007 + W.P. (C) 7247/2007 STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates versus DEVESH KUMAR SHARMA KEDAR NATH SATISH KUMAR MUKESH KUMAR LALIT SHARMA RAMESH LAL RAM KISHAN SHARMA VIJAY KUMAR SINGH SANJAY KUMAR RAM KUMAR RAM CHET .....Respondents + W.P. (C) 8739/2009 Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate RAM CHET & ORS. .....Petitioners W.P. (C) 7237/2007 & other connected matters Page 1 of 13 1. Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate versus STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Imp...
Ranjana Arora vs.surender Kumar Arora & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
$~5 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :-"10th April, 2018 CM (M) 162/2017 & CM Nos. 5348/2017, 18554/2017, 26099/2017 RANJANA ARORA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Alok Kumar & Mr. Rahul Madan, Advs. versus SURENDER KUMAR ARORA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Pinki Aggarwal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The civil suit (presently registered as suit No.613211/2016) was instituted by the petitioner on the original side of this Court in 1997, the prayer made being for partition of the subject property and rendition of accounts. The respondents who are defendants in the said suit are her siblings, all children and successors-in-interest of late Mr. Madan Lal Arora, the property which is the subject matter having been left behind by him as the estate. It appears reference has been made to a document described as last Will and testament of Mr. Madan Lal Arora. The written statement was filed by the first respondent (second defendant before ...
State Bank of India vs.sanjay Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: April 10, 2018 + W.P. (C) 7237/2007 + W.P. (C) 7238/2007 + W.P. (C) 7239/2007 + W.P. (C) 7240/2007 + W.P. (C) 7241/2007 + W.P. (C) 7242/2007 + W.P. (C) 7243/2007 + W.P. (C) 7244/2007 + W.P. (C) 7245/2007 + W.P. (C) 7246/2007 + W.P. (C) 7247/2007 STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates versus DEVESH KUMAR SHARMA KEDAR NATH SATISH KUMAR MUKESH KUMAR LALIT SHARMA RAMESH LAL RAM KISHAN SHARMA VIJAY KUMAR SINGH SANJAY KUMAR RAM KUMAR RAM CHET .....Respondents + W.P. (C) 8739/2009 Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate RAM CHET & ORS. .....Petitioners W.P. (C) 7237/2007 & other connected matters Page 1 of 13 1. Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate versus STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Imp...
Ashok Kumar Rai vs.veerammal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: April 10, 2018 + MAC.APP. 820/2014 1. ASHOK KUMAR RAI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj K. Tripathi & Mr. K.K. Tiwari, Advocate with appellant in person Versus VEERAMMAL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Harbir Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Impugned Award of 11th march, 2014 grants compensation of JUDGMENT (ORAL) `3,74,025/- with interest @9% p.a. to respondents-claimants on account of death of one Veera Swami, aged 56 years, in a vehicular accident on 20th April, 2010. The facts, as noted in the impugned Award by learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) are as under:-"Brief facts of the case are that on 20.4.2010 at around 11.15 am deceased Veera Swami going for his duty, when reached at Gate no.1 I.P.Park, opposite Ring Road, Sarai Kale Khan, New Delhi offending motorcycle number DL-3S-AX-3220 driven by R1 in rash and negligent manner hit the deceased,...
Sudhir Vohra vs.council of Architecture & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
$~24 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7170/2017 & CM No.29738/2017 % Date of decision :10. h April, 2018 ........ Petitioner Through :... Petitioner in person. SUDHIR VOHRA COUNCIL OF ARCHITECTURE & ORS ...... RESPONDENTS versus Through : Mr. Abhimanyu Verma and Mr. Naveen R. Nath, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel with Ms. Monisha Handa, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition seeks quashing of the letter dated 29th June, 2015 issued by the respondent no.3 Government of NCT of Delhi, nominating the respondent no.2 as a part of the Council of Architecture and consequently, setting aside the nomination of the respondent no.2 to the Council. W.P.(C)No.7170/2017 Page 1 of 2 2. The primary ground of challenge rested on the plea that the nomination of the respondent no.2 has not been made with the concurrence of the Lt. Governor of Delhi.3...
Ashwani Kumar vs.santosh Solanki
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h April, 2018. CS(OS) 326/2016 ASHWANI KUMAR ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Mohit Singh, Adv. Versus SANTOSH SOLANKI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Through: Mr. Prag Chawla, Adv. ..... Defendant 1. The plaintiff instituted this suit for recovery of Rs.3.20 crores with interest, pleading i) that the defendant is the sister of the plaintiff; ii) that the father of the parties was the owner of property No.C- 163, Surajmal Vihar, Delhi and died on 14th July, 1993 leaving besides the plaintiff and the defendant as his son and daughter, Smt. Premwati as his widow and Anil Kumar as another son; iii) CS(OS) No.761/2006 was filed by Anil Kumar, brother of the parties, for partition of the aforesaid property; iv) that during settlement talks in the course of CS(OS) No.761/2006, the plaintiff expressed intention to purchase 1/4th undivided share of the defendant in the aforesaid property and defendant agreed to receiv...
k.m.tomar vs.state Bank of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % K.M.TOMAR W.P.(C) No.791/2000 10th April, 2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. K.C. Mittal, Advocate with Ms Ruchika Mittal, Advocate, Mr. Yugansh Mittal, Advocate and Mr. Amit Prakash, Advocate. Versus Through: Mr. Rajiv Kapur, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.13454/2018 (for condonation of delay in filing review petition) 1. Though there is no ground for condonation of delay, however in the interest of justice, delay of 365 days in filing the review petition is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. Review Petition No.147/2018 2. Some litigants, it appears, are never satisfied. This is being stated by this Court because filing of review petition has now RP No.147/2018 in W.P.(C) No.791/2000 Page 1 of 4 become almost a habit with respect to certain litigants. Not only filing of the review petition becomi...
Samsung Electronics Company Limited & Anr. Vs.a.shajahantrading as M/S ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
21 $~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 574/2017 & I.As. 6484/2015 AND942017 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LIMITED & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Karan Bajaj, Advocate with Ms. Kangan Roda and Mr. Dhruv Nayar, Advocates. Versus A.SHAJAHANTRADING AS M/s. S.S.ENTERPRISES AND ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Date of Decision:10th April, 2018. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN MANMOHAN, J (Oral) JUDGMENT1 Present suit has been filed against the defendants for permanent injunction for infringement of trademarks and copyright, passing off, unfair competition, dilution, rendition of accounts, delivery up and recovery of damages etc. The prayer clause in the present suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-"A. A decree of permanent injunction be passed restraining the Defendants, their partners, agents, distributors, franchisees, representatives and assigns from: CS(COMM) 574/2017 Page 1 of 11 i. Manufacturing, importing, marketing, offering for sale, selling, exporting and/or u...
State Bank of India vs.vijay Kumar Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: April 10, 2018 + W.P. (C) 7237/2007 + W.P. (C) 7238/2007 + W.P. (C) 7239/2007 + W.P. (C) 7240/2007 + W.P. (C) 7241/2007 + W.P. (C) 7242/2007 + W.P. (C) 7243/2007 + W.P. (C) 7244/2007 + W.P. (C) 7245/2007 + W.P. (C) 7246/2007 + W.P. (C) 7247/2007 STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates versus DEVESH KUMAR SHARMA KEDAR NATH SATISH KUMAR MUKESH KUMAR LALIT SHARMA RAMESH LAL RAM KISHAN SHARMA VIJAY KUMAR SINGH SANJAY KUMAR RAM KUMAR RAM CHET .....Respondents + W.P. (C) 8739/2009 Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate RAM CHET & ORS. .....Petitioners W.P. (C) 7237/2007 & other connected matters Page 1 of 13 1. Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate versus STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Imp...
- ‹ Prev
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- Next ›
- Last »