Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vipin Kumar vs.hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 11, 2018 VIPIN KUMAR W.P.(C) 5795/2017 Through: Mr. Aasim Ali and Mr. Faiz Sherwani, Advocates ........ Petitioner Versus HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD AND ORS Through: Mr.Raj Birbal with Ms. Raavi Birbal, Advocate for respondent-HPCL .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1.... Petitioners Representation against 4 rating for the year 2014- 2015 (Annexure A-2 colly.) stands rejected by impugned order of 20th September, 2016 (Annexure A-1 Colly.). Prayer clause of the writ petition refers to a Representation of 20th September, 2016. It is pointed out by learned counsel for respondents that no such Representation is on record. Learned counsel for petitioner clarifies that it is a typographical error and infact, the Representation is of 20th September, 2015.2. Be that as it may. Upon hearing and on perusal of impugned rejection (Annexure A-1 colly.), I find that petitioners appraisal for th...
Indian Oil Corporation Limited vs.general Secretary, Bhartiya Shramjiv ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 11, 2018 (i) + W.P.(C) 22957/2005 INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Navet & Mr. Kushagra Pandit, Advocates Versus PETROLEUM WORKERS UNION Through: Mr. B.K. Singh, Advocate ..... Respondent (ii) + W.P.(C) 22992/2005 INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Navet & Mr. Kushagra Pandit, Advocates Versus GENERAL SECRETARY, BHARITYA SHRAMJIVI SANGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. B.K. Singh, Advocate (iii) + W.P.(C) 6915/2010 INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Navet & Mr. Kushagra Pandit, Advocates Versus GENERAL SECRETARY, BHARTIYA SHRAMJIVI SANGH Through: Mr. Sunil Dwivedi, Mr. Puneet Saini & Mr. Bimal Prakash, Advocates ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 22957/2005 W.P.(C) 22992/2005 W.P.(C) 6915/2010 Page 1 of 5 1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR (ORAL) JUDGMENT The challenge to the impugned Award of 19th September, 2005 in W.P.(C) 22957/...
Radha Krishan Wadhwa vs.kusum Wadhwa & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
$~5 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"11th April, 2018 CM (M) 8/2017 RADHA KRISHAN WADHWA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S.C. Singhal, Adv. versus KUSUM WADHWA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sourabh Malhotra, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Anil Kumar Chandel, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is the first plaintiff of the civil suit (CS No.55/2016) which was instituted in January, 2011 on the original side of this Court where it was registered as CS (OS) 185/2011. The suit as presented is directed against the first respondent, the reliefs claimed being decree for possession, injunction prohibitory and mandatory, damages and mesne profits in respect of ground floor portion of property described as I-30, Lajpat Nagar, III, New Delhi.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 09.11.2016 passed by the Additional District Judge whereby the application of the second respondent for impleadment in the said suit under Order...
Suranjan Singh vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 822/2002 & CRL.M.A.2996/2003 Decided on:11. h April 2018 Reserved on:22. d March 2018 MANOJ & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Vikram Singh Panwar and Mr. Vikas Walia, Advocates. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State. With CRL.A. 836/2002 RAM NIWAS & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advocates for appellant no.1 Mr. Manoj Kumar Ohri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Varun Tyagi, Mr. Bharat Gupta, Mr. Nawab Singh Jaglan, Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Raj, Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Mr. Vishesh Chauhan and Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Advocates for Appellant Nos. 3 and 4. Versus + STATE OF NCT OF DELHI CRL.A Nos. 822/2002, 836/2002, 929/2002 & 937/2002 ..... Respondent Page 1 of 34 Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State. + CRL.A. 929/2002 With SURANJAN SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikram Singh Panwar and Mr. Vikas Walia, Advocates. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........
R. K. Aggarwal & Anr. Vs.state of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST CAS.11/2003 + % R. K. AGGARWAL & ANR. Through:11. h April, 2018 ........ Petitioners Mr. Rana Ranjit Singh, Mr. Vivek Kumar and Mr. Ravish Singh, Advocates. versus STATE OF DELHI & ORS. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ........ RESPONDENTS To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This probate petition is filed by two petitioners seeking probate of the Will dated 26.3.2002 executed by late Smt. Sudha Rani.... Petitioner no.1 Sh. Rajeev Kumar Aggarwal is the son of late Smt. Sudha Rani. Original petitioner no.2 Sh. Hari Mohan Goel was the father of the deceased testator Smt. Sudha Rani, and who expired pendente lite, and he is now substituted by his son Sh. Anil Goel and who as per the subject Will was appointed as a guardian of the petitioner no.1 after the death of Sh. Hari Mohan Goel. TEST CAS No.11/2003 Page 1 of 15 2. There are a total of two private respondents. Respondent no.2 is the daughter o...
Shri Ramesh Kaboo vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Order: April 11, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3526/2018 & C.M. 13924-25/2018 1. SHRI RAMESH KABOO ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Raina, Advocate Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Suparna Srivastava, Standing Counsel for respondent No.1-UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner was prematurely retired on 5th July, 2017 and his Representation seeking revocation of his premature retirement has been rejected vide impugned order of 29th December, 2017, which is a cryptic order. It gives no reason as to why petitioners Representation has been rejected.2. In view of aforesaid, Director General of Bureau of Indian Standards is called upon to reconsider petitioners Representation of 25th July, 2017 and 6th September, 2017 and pass a speaking order thereon within a period of six weeks. The fate of Representations be conveyed to petitioner within a week thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of ...
Wimpy International Limited & Anr vs.kalvinder Singh Sandhu & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % EFA(OS) 13/2016 Date of decision:11. h April, 2018 WIMPY INTERNATIONAL LIMITED & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Hrishikesh Baruah, Mr.Pranav versus Jain, Ms. Radhika Gupta, Advs. KALVINDER SINGH SANDHU & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anand Verma, Ms. Manpreet Kaur, Ms. Shubhangi Jain, Advs. for R1 Mr. Giriraj Subramanium, Mr.Simarpal Singh Sawhney, Mr.Vikash Pathak, Advs. for R2 Mr. Manav Gupta, Ms.Esha Dutta, Mr.Sahil Garg, Advocates for R3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J (ORAL) CM No.14895/2016 This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay of 37 days in filing of the appeal against order of the single Judge dated 5th February, 2016. Reply to this application has not been preferred by the respondents.2. Paragraph 3 of the application reads as under: That the Applicant/Appellant herein had applied for the certified copy...
Audio Voice India Private Limited vs.vivek Khanna & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h April, 2018. CS(OS) 107/2018, IA No.4622/2018 (u/S151CPC) & IA No.4633/2018 (u/O XXXIX R-4 CPC) AUDIO VOICE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Through: Mr. Jatinder Kumar Sethi, Adv. ..... Plaintiff Versus VIVEK KHANNA & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Through: Dr. Man Mohan Sharma, Adv. ..... Defendants 1. The plaintiff has instituted this suit against the two defendants viz. Vivek Khanna and Shikha Khanna, for i) declaration that Clause 19 of the registered Lease Deed dated 20th May, 2013 between the parties is null, void, inoperative and unenforceable; ii) declaration that there is no valid termination of the registered Lease Deed dated 20th May, 2013 and that the said Lease Deed subsists and the plaintiff has a legal right to remain in occupation of property No.D-27, Lajpat Nagar-II, New Delhi-110024 till 30th June, 2019, as long as the plaintiff continues to pay the contracted rent; iii) permanent injunction...
Nhai vs.m/s. Prakash Atlanta (Jv)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:04. 04.2018 Pronounced on:11. 04.2018 FAO(OS) (COMM) 1/2017 & CM APPL. 114/2017 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain, Advocate. versus M/S PRAKASH ATLANTA (JV) ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Chirag. M. Shroff, Ms. Neha Sangwan, Ms. Aakashi Lodha and Mr. Sanjeevi Seshadri, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) questions the decision of a learned Single Judge, rejecting the appellant's objections/petition under Section 34. The petition had challenged an arbitral award, dated 30.01.2015 (and the corrected award dated 07.11.2015). The appellant is described for convenience as NHAI and the respondent is hereafter referred to variously as the Claimant or Prakash.2. The relevant fac...
Sunder Singh Talwar vs.kamal Chand Dugar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
$~J- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:11. 04.2018 RC.REV. 74/2017 and CM No.6184/2017(stay) SUNDER SINGH TALWAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Brij Bhushan Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Jai Sahai Endlaw, Advocate Versus KAMAL CHAND DUGAR ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ravi Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Jain, and Mr.Manu Jain, Mr.Sachin Mr.Ankit Mr.Sarvesh Rai Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. This revision petition is filed under Section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) seeking to impugn the eviction order and judgment dated 09.08.2016 passed by the court of Additional Rent Controller (hereinafter referred to as the ARC). By the impugned order, the ARC dismissed the application for leave to defend under Section 25B of the DRC Act and passed an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act.2. The respondent/landlord filed the eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Ac...