Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Maahir Rajeev Sharma (Minor Through His Father) vs.central Board of Se ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :09. 04.2018. + W.P.(C) 1329/2018 & C.M. No.5533/2018 MAAHIR RAJEEV SHARMA (MINOR THROUGH HIS FATHER) Through Mr.K.P. Toms, Adv. with ........ Petitioner versus Mr.Anil Singh Bist, Adv. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION AND ANR. Through Mr.Atul Kumar, Adv. for R-1. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Thomas Skaria, Adv. for R- 2/ ndraprastha International School. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the respondents submit that since the petitioner has filed all the relevant documents, he does not wish to file a counter affidavit and would make submissions based on the pleadings already on record.2. Vide the present petition, the petitioner, a student of class X in respondent no.2/School, seeks a direction to respondents, to change his name from Maahir Sharma to Maahir Rajeev Sharma in his Class X certificate to be issued to him by respondent no.1/CBSE, in which examination, he has alread...
Ram Krishn Rajpal vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 09, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3439/2018 & C.M. 13596/2018 1. RAM KRISHN RAJPAL ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj & Mr. T.P. Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR... Petitioners request for cancellation of transfer stands declined vide ORDER (ORAL) order of 7th March, 2018 (Annexure P-8).... Petitioner claims to have appeared before the Estate Officer on 14th March, 2018 and on the said date, he had come to know about rejection of his Representation. As per petitioner, the Estate Officer had orally directed him to vacate the accommodation allotted to him in New Delhi by 10th April, 2018 without passing any formal order in eviction proceedings. In this petition, retention of Group Pool Residential Accommodation No.A-330, Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi is sought by petitioner.2. Counsel for petitioner submits that as per ...
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. Vs.gaurav Enterprises
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:09. 04.2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 286/2016 and IA No.6836/2016 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD. ....... Petitioner versus ..... Respondent GAURAV ENTERPRISES Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Saket Sikri, Mr Junaid Nahvi and Ms Niyati Patwardhan. : Dr Anurag Kumar Agarwal with Ms Chelina Chelina. WITH + O.M.P. (COMM) 181/2017 and IA Nos. 4244/2017 & 7724/2017 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD........ Petitioner versus H.S. CONSTRUCTIONS CO. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Saket Sikri, Mr Junaid Nahvi and Ms Niyati Patwardhan. : Mr Dinesh Mohan Sinha. + O.M.P. (COMM) 182/2017 and IA Nos. 4245/2017 & 7726/2017 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD........ Petitioner versus O.M.P. (COMM) 286/2016 & Other Connected Matters Page 1 of 15 H.S. CONSTRUCTIONS CO. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitione...
Lokendra Gehlot vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:9. h April, 2018 + W.P.(C) 10535/2016 and CM No.41377/2016 LOKENDRA GEHLOT Through : Mr. M. Tarique Siddiqui, Mr. ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Tamim Qadri, Mr. Tanveer Ahmad and Ms. Reetika Gupta, Advs. Versus Through : Mr. GiGi C. George, Adv. for ........ RESPONDENTS R-1,2 & 5 with R-5. Mr. Naresh Kaushik and Mr. Devik Singh, Advs. for R Mr. Girish Pande, Adv. for R CORAM:-"HONBLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT (ORAL) C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. After hearing detailed arguments in this matter, we had, on 9th April, 2018, dismissed this writ petition stating that the reasons for our decision would follow. This judgment proceeds to record the reasons therefor.2. The petitioner, who claims to be a public spirited citizen, belonging to the agriculture background who works for the benefits and upgradation of farming community and, incidentally, an advocate W.P.(C) 10535/2016 Page ...
Trimax It and Infrastructure Services Ltd vs.kalakriti Interiors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.304/2018 + % TRIMAX IT AND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES LTD. Reserved on:4. h April, 2018 Pronounced on:9. h April, 2018 Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Dilip Kumar Mishra, Advocate versus KALAKRITI INTERIORS ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J CM No.12701/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. CM No.12699/2018 (delay of 118 days in filing the appeal) For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing is condoned, subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. RFA No.304/2018 & CM No.12700/2018 (stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit RFA No.304/2018 Page 1 of 11 impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 18.8.2017 by which the trial court has decreed the suit of the respondent/plaintiff for a sum of Rs.34,08,6...
Narinder Singh Narang vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : APRIL09 2018 + BAIL APPLN. 92/2018 NARINDER SINGH NARANG ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr.Advocate, with Mr.Manjeet Singh Ahluwalia & Mr.Mohit Bhandari, Advocates. STATE ..... Respondent Versus Through : Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP with SI Sanjeev Kumar, PS C.R.Park. Mr.Puneet Mittal, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Amit Gupta, Advocate for the complainant along with complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.87/2017 under Sections 420/120-B IPC registered at Police Station Chitranjan Park. Status report is on record.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties including the counsel for the complainant and have examined the file. Contention of the learned Senior counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has Bail Appl.92/2018 Page 1 of 4 been falsely named in the FIR. The complainant was not cheated in any manner by the pe...
S vs.V
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
$~ * % + MAT.APP. 68/2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:09. h April, 2018 S V Through: Ms. Deepali Gupta, Adv. ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.C. Gupta, Adv. for Bank of India. Mr. N.K. Sharma, Adv. as amicus curiae. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The appellant has challenged the judgment dated 25th February, 2010 whereby the learned Trial Court dissolved the marriage between the parties by a decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. For the sake of convenience, the respondent herein is referred to as the petitioner and the appellant is referred to as the respondent, as per their nomenclature before the learned Trial Court.2. The petitioner instituted a petition for divorce against the respondent under Sections 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act on the averments that the parties were married according to the Hindu rites and ceremonies on 07th November, ...
M/S. Vibhor Marketing (P) Ltd. Vs.assistant Provident Fund Commissione ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :09. 04.2018 WP(C) 3431/2018 M/S. VIBHOR MARKETING (P) LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Rashmi Chopra and Ms.Asiya, Advocates. versus ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER...Respondent Through: Mr.Rajesh Manchanda & Mr.Rajat Manchanda, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 13522/2018 (Exemption) Exemptions granted subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 3431/2018 & CM APPL. 13521/2018 1. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 14.03.2018 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court No.1, Dwarka Courts Complex, New Delhi (in short the Tribunal) in ATA No.O- 1/07/2017 by which the pre-deposit amount was reduced to 50% from 75% of the assessed amount.2. The respondent, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, by an order dated 29.04.2016, had assessed the provident W...
Steria India Ltd. (Earlier Known as Xansa (India) Ltd.) vs.deputy Comm ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
* IN THE HIGH CO URT O F DE L HI AT NEW DE LHI % Judgment delivered on:9. h April, 2018 + ITA4032017 STERIA INDIA LTD. (EARLIER KNOWN AS XANSA (INDIA) LTD.) DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX ..... Respondent ..... Appellant Versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr. Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Jain & Mr. Aniket D. Agrawal, Advs For the Respondent : Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. The question of law arising for consideration in this appeal by the assessee under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), impugning the judgment dated 04.11.2016 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the tribunal) is as under:-"Did the Tribunal fall into error in including M/s. Thirdware Solutions Limited in the List of Comparables and excluding M/s. CG-VAK Software and Exports Limi...
Sachin Nandal vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3442/2018 Date of Order: April 09, 2018 1. SACHIN NANDAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Yashpal Rangi, Advocate Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vikas Mehta & Mr. Rajat Sehgal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner claims to have applied for the post of Marketing Assistant in pursuance to Advertisement No.GAIL/OPEN/MISC/1/2017 issued by second respondent and is said to have participated in the written examination. According to petitioner, an e-mail was received from 2nd respondent on 18th January, 2018 asking petitioner to come for verification of original certificates and for pre-employment medical examination scheduled on 10th / 11th February, 2018.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner had produced his original certificates for verification and had undergone the medical examination but thereafter, petitioner was orally told that his case has bee...