Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Balbir Kaur Dahele vs.delhi Sikh Gurudwara Managing Committee & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 09, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3421/2018 1. BALBIR KAUR DAHELE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurab Chadda & Mr. Rohit Bhagat, Advocates Versus DELHI SIKH GURUDWARA MANAGING COMMITTEE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh & Mr. Aditya Madaan, Advocates for respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. V. Balaji, Advocate for respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In this petition, implementation of order of 11th February, 2009 (Annexure A-1) of respondent No.3-Directorate of Education in respect of payment of salary etc. in terms of recommendations of Sixth Central Pay Commission is sought.... Petitioner is a Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT) and it is her case that various oral and written requests for implementation of recommendations of Sixth Central Pay Commission were made to second respondent but to no avail. Copy of such Representations has not been placed on record.2. In the facts and circumstances of th...
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. Vs.h.s. Constructions Co.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:09. 04.2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 286/2016 and IA No.6836/2016 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD. ....... Petitioner versus ..... Respondent GAURAV ENTERPRISES Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Saket Sikri, Mr Junaid Nahvi and Ms Niyati Patwardhan. : Dr Anurag Kumar Agarwal with Ms Chelina Chelina. WITH + O.M.P. (COMM) 181/2017 and IA Nos. 4244/2017 & 7724/2017 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD........ Petitioner versus H.S. CONSTRUCTIONS CO. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Saket Sikri, Mr Junaid Nahvi and Ms Niyati Patwardhan. : Mr Dinesh Mohan Sinha. + O.M.P. (COMM) 182/2017 and IA Nos. 4245/2017 & 7726/2017 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD........ Petitioner versus O.M.P. (COMM) 286/2016 & Other Connected Matters Page 1 of 15 H.S. CONSTRUCTIONS CO. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitione...
Sanjay Choudhary vs.dinesh Kundra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:9. h April, 2018 CRL.L.P. 211/2018 SANJAY CHOUDHARY ........ Petitioner DINESH KUNDRA Represented by: versus , Advocates Represented by: , Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. No.6156/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CRL.L.P. 211/2018 1. Aggrieved by the judgment dated 19th December, 2017, whereby the learned Metropolitan Magistrate acquitted the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, petitioner has preferred the present leave petition.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that respondent approached the petitioner with a request for a friendly loan from time to time for his business and personal requirement, committing to repay the same by the last week of December 2014. When the petitioner approached the respondent for repayment of loan, respondent sought more time to repay a...
Sachin Mann vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 04.2018 BAIL APPLN. 476/2018 SACHIN MANN versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Sumit Choudhary, Advocate. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the State. SI Tejwati, PS Alipur. Mr. Gaurav Chitkara with Mr. Ankit Sethi, Advocates for the complainant. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0904.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The Nominal Roll of the petitioner has been received. The same is taken on record. As per the Nominal Roll, the petitioner was arrested on 03.02.2018 and, as on 03.04.2018, has already undergone two months of imprisonment.2. The petitioner seeks Regular Bail in FIR No.48/2018 under Sections 376/323/506 IPC, Police Station Alipur. The allegations in the FIR are that the prosecutrix and the petitioner were known to each other for the last 3-4 BAIL APPLN. 476/2018 P...
Jaskinder Kaur & Ors. Vs.punjabi Academy & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Order: April 09, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3441/2018 & C.M. 13601/2018 1. JASKINDER KAUR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Bharat Bhushan Bhatia, Advocate Versus PUNJABI ACADEMY & ORS. Through: Nemo. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioners seek a mandamus to first respondent to pay salary / allowances as per Rule 101 (2) of Delhi School Education Act & Rules, 1973 and as per recommendations of Seventh Central Pay Commission. It is submitted that for the relief sought in this petition, representation was made by petitioners to first respondent on 7th February, 2018 but to no avail.2. Despite service of advance notice, there is no representation on behalf of respondents.3. In the facts and circumstances of this case, this petition is disposed of with direction to first respondent to consider and decide petitioners Representation of 7th February, 2018 (Annexure P-5) within a period of W.P.(C) 3441...
Chadha Sports (Regd) vs.pwd, Gnctd and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:09. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) 851/2018, C.M. APPL.3631-3632/2018 CHADHA SPORTS (REGD) ........ Petitioner Through : Ms. Aanchal Basur with Sh. Shahab Ahmad, Advocates. versus PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, GNCTD AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Sh. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel, GNCTD with Sh. Aniruddha Deshmukh, Advocates, for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioner, in these writ proceedings, challenges a stipulation in the Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) dated 12.01.2018 for construction of Synthetic Athletic Track (SAT) at the Rajiv Gandhi Stadium, Bawana (hereafter referred to as the project). The NIT was issued by the GNCTD on 12.01.2018. The condition specifically challenged is the technical specification in the NIT requiring that the thickness of the SAT should be not less than 15 mm. The petitioner complains that this st...
Moti Lal vs.raj Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
$~10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"9th April, 2018 + RC.REV. 302/2015 MOTI LAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate versus RAJ KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vikrant Arora, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) The petitioner had instituted a case (E. No.508/2014) for eviction on 27.08.2012 against the respondent seeking order of eviction on the ground of bona fide need invoking Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 in respect of residential house at ground floor, bearing property No.5384/12, Gali No.6, New Chandrawal, Delhi-110007 (the tenanted premises).2. Having regard to the ground taken, the procedure under Section 25-B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 was invoked and the additional rent controller (ARC) issued summons to the respondent under Section 25-B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. The respondent, admittedly a tenant in respect of the tenanted premises, filed an application seeking ...
State Bank of India vs.satish Kumar Mittal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $-21,22,23, & 24 * % Decided on:09. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) 674/2017 .Petitioner STATE BANK OF INDIA Through: Mr. Sanjiv Kakra and Mr. Bheem Sain Jain, Advocates. versus SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ..Respondent Through: Mr. Krishna Kumar and Ms. Srujana Suman Mund, Advocates. And + W.P.(C) 675/2017 STATE BANK OF INDIA .Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjiv Kakra and Mr. Bheem Sain Jain, Advocates. versus SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ..Respondent Through: Mr. Krishna Kumar and Ms. Srujana Suman Mund, Advocates. And + W.P.(C) 676/2017 STATE BANK OF INDIA .Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjiv Kakra and Mr. Bheem Sain Jain, Advocates. versus SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ..Respondent Through: Mr. Krishna Kumar and Ms. Srujana Suman Mund, Advocates. And W.P.(C) 674/2017 Page 1 + W.P.(C) 677/2017 STATE BANK OF INDIA .Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjiv Kakra and Mr. Bheem Sain Jain, Advocates. versus SATISH KUMAR MITTAL & Ors. ..Respondent Through: Mr. Krishna Kumar and Ms. Srujana Suman Mund, Advocate...
Indian Statistical Institute vs.a2z Constructions
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
$~J- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:09. 04.2018 ARB.A. 38/2015 INDIAN STATISTICAL INSTITUTE ..... Appellant Through Mr.Neeraj Chaudhari, Mr.Ravjyot Singh and Mr.S.A.Srinivas, Advocates versus A2Z CONSTRUCTIONS ..... Respondent Through Mr.Dilraj Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. This appeal is filed under section 37(2) (a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking to impugn the order dated 6.4.2015 by which order the learned Tribunal concluded that the Arbitral Tribunal has no jurisdiction in the matter relating to arbitration between the parties.2. The case of the appellant is that the work for construction of Mess Building, (Civil and Allied Work) was awarded to the respondent vide letter dated 7.2.2011. The total costs of the work after rebate was Rs.2,71,89,805/-.3. On 16.8.2011 a New Mess Building Construction Evaluation Committee was constituted to oversee and evaluate the work. Various observations about ...
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited vs.m/s Carrycon India Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:09. 04.2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 288/2016 and IA Nos. 6842/2016, 4440/2017 & 5924/2017 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus ..... Respondent M/s CARRYCON INDIA LIMITED Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr Saket Sikri, Mr Junaid Nahvi and Ms Niyati Patwardhan. Ms Kamlakshi and Mr D. Saundarya Singh. For the Respondent: CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J Introduction 1. The petitioner (hereafter MTNL) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning the arbitral award dated 30.12.2015 (hereafter the impugned award) delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted by a sole arbitrator, Mr Ashok Sharma, former CGM (Law), MMTC (hereafter the Arbitral Tribunal). The impugned award was rendered in the context of disputes that had arisen between the parties in respect of the Agreement for...