Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Fankaar Interiors Pvt Ltd vs.m/s Doonvalley Technopolis Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:02. d April, 2018 Pronounced on:10. h April, 2018 CS(COMM) 243/2016 + M/S FANKAAR INTERIORS PVT LTD Through Mr.Rajat Joseph, Advocate. ..... Plaintiff versus M/S DOONVALLEY TECHNOPOLIS PVT LTD ..... Defendant Through Mr.Keshav Mohan, Mr.Rishi K. and Ms.Ritu Arora, Awasthi Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.O.A. 21/2017 (filed against order dated 09.12.2016 of the learned Joint Registrar); IA No.1970/2017 (under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning 45 days in moving OA No.21/2017); IA No.8138/2017 (under Section of the Arbitration Act); IA No.10169/2017 (for leave to defend moved by defendant); IA No.10170/2017 (under Section 5 of Limitation Act for condoning 369 days in moving IA No.10169/2017) 1. All four applications and Chamber Appeal No.21/2017 have been moved by the defendant. Before coming to the appeal and applications, some dates and facts relevant are noted hereunder:-"a) The ...
The Stc Ex-Employees Welfare Association (Regd.) vs.the State Trading ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 10, 2018 W.P.(C) 3454/2018 & CMs 13624-25/2018 THE STC EX-EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION (REGD.) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit Jain and Mr. Gaurav Jain, Advocates versus THE STATE TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Mr. Onkar Nath and Mr. Saurabh Kumar Tuteja, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Vide impugned Circular of 15th March, 2018, State Trading * + 1. Corporation Retired Employees Medical Benefit Scheme, 1981 has been reviewed on the ground of affordability and precarious financial position of respondent-The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as STC). Aggrieved by the aforesaid Circular, petitioner- Association vide Representation (Annexure P-16) of even date, has sought withdrawal of Circulars of the years 2013, 2017 and 2018, as the said Circulars are said to be ...
Mahabir Singh vs.the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
$~5 to 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 04.2018 BAIL APPLN. 871/2017 SHASHWAT & ANR versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 942/2017 + + RANBIR SINGH versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI BAIL APPLN. 979/2017 MAHABIR SINGH versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI BAIL APPLN. 982/2017 SUMIT KUMAR DAHIYA versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr.Puneet Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr Neeraj Kumar, Advocate. BAIL APPLN. 871/2017,942/2017, 979/2017 & 982/2017 Page 1 For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the State. SI Om Prakash , PS Hauz Khas. Mr P.K.Dubey with Ms Vasundhara Nagrath, Advocates for the complainants. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1004.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The... Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR ...
State Bank of India vs.ramesh Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: April 10, 2018 + W.P. (C) 7237/2007 + W.P. (C) 7238/2007 + W.P. (C) 7239/2007 + W.P. (C) 7240/2007 + W.P. (C) 7241/2007 + W.P. (C) 7242/2007 + W.P. (C) 7243/2007 + W.P. (C) 7244/2007 + W.P. (C) 7245/2007 + W.P. (C) 7246/2007 + W.P. (C) 7247/2007 STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates versus DEVESH KUMAR SHARMA KEDAR NATH SATISH KUMAR MUKESH KUMAR LALIT SHARMA RAMESH LAL RAM KISHAN SHARMA VIJAY KUMAR SINGH SANJAY KUMAR RAM KUMAR RAM CHET .....Respondents + W.P. (C) 8739/2009 Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate RAM CHET & ORS. .....Petitioners W.P. (C) 7237/2007 & other connected matters Page 1 of 13 1. Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate versus STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Imp...
Dharambir Singh vs.director of Education & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
#21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. 04.2018 LPA1822018 & CM No.13387/2018 (under Section 151 CPC for taking additional grounds in the appeal) DHARAMBIR SINGH ..... Appellant versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: FortheAppellant FortheRespondents ........ RESPONDENTS :MrMr.J.P.Sengh,SeniorAdvocatealongwithMs.ManishaMehta, Ms.VaishaliTanwar,Mr.JitenderVermaandMs.MrignaShekhar, Advocatesalongwithappellantinperson. : Mr. Mr. Naushad Ahmad Khan, ASC (Civil), GNCTD with Mr. Devesh Dubey, Advocate for respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) CM No.13386/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. LPA1822018 Page 1 of 7 LPA No.182/2018 1. The present appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent Act assails a judgment and order dated 23.02.2018, rendered by a learned Single Judge of...
Upasana & Ors. Vs.government of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 10, 2018 W.P.(C) 3507/2018 & CM138372018 UPASANA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, Advocate versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rashmi Chopra and Ms. Asiya, Advocates for respondents No.1 and 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioners are TGT (Science), Peon and Water-Women (Aaya), who claim to be employees of respondent-School. It is the grievance of petitioners that their Representation seeking regularization of House Rent Allowance (HRA) and Transport Allowance (TA) w.e.f. from 1st April, 2014 stood rejected by DAV College Management Committee vide Communication (Annexure P-13) in November, 2017.... Petitioners counsel claims that they had requested respondent-Directorate of Education for disbursement of HRA, TA arrears and other financial benefits in terms of Sixth Pay Commission vide Representations of 20th December, 2017, ...
Vijay Rani vs.madan Lal & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
$~4 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :-"10th April, 2018 CM (M) 170/2016 VIJAY RANI Through: Mr. Sunil Tiwari, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Adv. MADAN LAL & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The proceedings in the suit (suit No.247/2010) of the petitioner instituted on 11.01.2010 for reliefs of declaration, partition, possession, rendition of accounts, permanent injunction, primarily concerning two immovable properties, they having been described as property bearing No.16/975, Bapa Nagar, Pyare Lal Road, Old Chungi, Bodla Wala ki Basti, New Delhi 110005 and shop bearing No.14-A/B, Sangita Press, Pyare Lal Road, Dev Nagar, New Delhi - 110005, stood concluded on 10.12.2013 on the basis of statements, inter alia, of the petitioner (plaintiff of the case) and of the first respondent (first defendant of the case), recorded in the context of an application moved under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code ...
Ntpc Limited vs.jindal Itf Limited & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
$~21 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h April, 2018 ARB. A. (COMM.) 19/2018 NTPC LIMITED Through: Mr.R.P. Bhatt, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Bani ........ Petitioner versus Dikshit & Mr.Nikita Chonkse, Advs. JINDAL ITF LIMITED & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Manoj K. Singh & Mr.Nilava Bandyopadhyay, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) CAV2952018 As the learned counsel for the respondent enters appearance on advance notice, the caveat stands discharged. IA No.4672-4673/2018(Exemptions) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. ARB. A. (COMM.) 19/2018 & IA No.4671/2018 1. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by Mr.Manoj K. Singh, Advocate on behalf of the respondent.2. By way of the present appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the appellant seeks to challenge the order dated 20.12.2017 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal in arbitration proceedings between the parties insofar as it directs the appellant...
Shri Ram vs.national Capital Territory of Delhi (Govt of Delhi ) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:10. h April, 2018 CM(M) 804/2017 and CM270912017 SHRI RAM Through: Ms. Raghubir Singh Rana, ........ Petitioner versus Advocate NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI (GOVT OF DELHI ) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.S. Parashar, Adv. for R-6 to 11 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The sixth to eleventh respondents (collectively, the plaintiffs) had instituted civil suit (suit no.445/12) seeking reliefs of declaration and mandatory injunction with damages, impleading the first to fifth respondents (first to fifth defendants before the trial court), the cause of action pleaded and the prayer made therein concerning certain land over which the petitioner has been claiming right of way, this assertion on his part having earlier been the subject matter of dispute before the Financial Commissioner leading to order dated 23.08.2011 in proceedings taken out by him against Consolidation Officer / Tehsildar, Khe...
State Bank of India vs.satish Kumar Mittal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $-21,22,23, & 24 * % Decided on:09. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) 674/2017 .Petitioner STATE BANK OF INDIA Through: Mr. Sanjiv Kakra and Mr. Bheem Sain Jain, Advocates. versus SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ..Respondent Through: Mr. Krishna Kumar and Ms. Srujana Suman Mund, Advocates. And + W.P.(C) 675/2017 STATE BANK OF INDIA .Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjiv Kakra and Mr. Bheem Sain Jain, Advocates. versus SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ..Respondent Through: Mr. Krishna Kumar and Ms. Srujana Suman Mund, Advocates. And + W.P.(C) 676/2017 STATE BANK OF INDIA .Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjiv Kakra and Mr. Bheem Sain Jain, Advocates. versus SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ..Respondent Through: Mr. Krishna Kumar and Ms. Srujana Suman Mund, Advocates. And W.P.(C) 674/2017 Page 1 + W.P.(C) 677/2017 STATE BANK OF INDIA .Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjiv Kakra and Mr. Bheem Sain Jain, Advocates. versus SATISH KUMAR MITTAL & Ors. ..Respondent Through: Mr. Krishna Kumar and Ms. Srujana Suman Mund, Advocate...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »