Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State Bank of India vs.ram Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: April 10, 2018 + W.P. (C) 7237/2007 + W.P. (C) 7238/2007 + W.P. (C) 7239/2007 + W.P. (C) 7240/2007 + W.P. (C) 7241/2007 + W.P. (C) 7242/2007 + W.P. (C) 7243/2007 + W.P. (C) 7244/2007 + W.P. (C) 7245/2007 + W.P. (C) 7246/2007 + W.P. (C) 7247/2007 STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates versus DEVESH KUMAR SHARMA KEDAR NATH SATISH KUMAR MUKESH KUMAR LALIT SHARMA RAMESH LAL RAM KISHAN SHARMA VIJAY KUMAR SINGH SANJAY KUMAR RAM KUMAR RAM CHET .....Respondents + W.P. (C) 8739/2009 Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate RAM CHET & ORS. .....Petitioners W.P. (C) 7237/2007 & other connected matters Page 1 of 13 1. Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate versus STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Imp...
Oriflame India Private Limited vs.assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
$~4 to 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:10. 04.2018 + ITA8112017 ORIFLAME INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent + ITA8122017 ORIFLAME INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent + ITA8132017 ORIFLAME INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX..... Respondent + ITA8252017 ORIFLAME INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ..... Respondent ITA8112017 & connected appeals Page 1 of 12 Present: Mr.Himanshu Sinha and Mr. Bhuwan Dhoopar, Advocates for petitioner. Mr.Deepak Anand, Jr.Standing Counsel for Revenue. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1 2 Admit. The following question of law arises for consideration in all these appeals: 1.Did the ITAT fall into error in regard to the finding w...
Kailash Chand Jain vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on :13. h March, 2018 Date of decision :10. h April, 2018 BAIL APPLN. 537/2018 KAILASH CHAND JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, Sr. Adv with. Mr. Rajesh Srivastava, Mr. Narveer Dabas, Advs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for State. Mr. Gaurav Singh, APP for SIT. Mr. Surender Mohit Singh, APP for SIT. IO Inspr. Jagdish for SIT. ACP Ranvir Khatri for SIT. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA ANU MALHOTRA, J.ORDER1 Vide the present bail application, the petitioner Kailash Chand Jain seeks the grant of bail of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in FIR No.137/1991, registered at the Police Station Shahdara and now known as Police Station Welcome, registered under Sections 120B/147/148/149/302/395/ 397/427/436/201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 submitting to the effect that ; (a). he is innocent and has been falsely implicated; (b). t...
Govt. Of Nct of Delhi vs.continental Engineering Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 143/2018 and IA Nos. 4682-4683/2018 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel for GNCTD with Mr Sanjay Dewan, ASC for GNCTD with Mr Chirayu Jain, Advocate. ..... Respondent versus CONTINENTAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1004.2018 Through VIBHU BAKHRU, J Introduction 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning the arbitral award dated 30.11.2017 (hereafter the impugned award) delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted of a sole arbitrator, Sh K.K. Varma (Retired), Additional Director General, CPWD (hereafter the Arbitral Tribunal).2. The impugned award was rendered in the context of disputes that had arisen between the parties in respect of contract for execution of the works relating to the Comprehensive Development of Corridor O.M.P. (COM...
M/S Current Advertising Pvt. Ltd. Vs.m/s Cement Corporation of India L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:21. t March, 2018 Pronounced on:10. h April, 2018 CS(COMM) 136/2017 M/S CURRENT ADVERTISING PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.Kamal Gupta, Ms.Tripti Gupta, and Mr.Kirti Kakkar, Advocates. versus M/S CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD .. Defendant Through : Mr.Arvind Kr Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This is an application under Section 14 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 for filing the award dated 27.2.2009 and making it a rule of Court. This application is pending since 2009. The brief facts of the case are as follows : (a) The petitioner has been carrying on business of publicity and advertisements. The respondent No.1 is a Government of India enterprise and is a company under the Indian Companies Act, 1956; (b) that a contract dated 02.02.1993 came into existence between the petitioner and the respondent No.1 on the petitioner accepting the terms and conditions which were received...
Ranbir Singh vs.the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
$~5 to 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 04.2018 BAIL APPLN. 871/2017 SHASHWAT & ANR versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 942/2017 + + RANBIR SINGH versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI BAIL APPLN. 979/2017 MAHABIR SINGH versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI BAIL APPLN. 982/2017 SUMIT KUMAR DAHIYA versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr.Puneet Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr Neeraj Kumar, Advocate. BAIL APPLN. 871/2017,942/2017, 979/2017 & 982/2017 Page 1 For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the State. SI Om Prakash , PS Hauz Khas. Mr P.K.Dubey with Ms Vasundhara Nagrath, Advocates for the complainants. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1004.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The... Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR ...
State Bank of India vs.lalit Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: April 10, 2018 + W.P. (C) 7237/2007 + W.P. (C) 7238/2007 + W.P. (C) 7239/2007 + W.P. (C) 7240/2007 + W.P. (C) 7241/2007 + W.P. (C) 7242/2007 + W.P. (C) 7243/2007 + W.P. (C) 7244/2007 + W.P. (C) 7245/2007 + W.P. (C) 7246/2007 + W.P. (C) 7247/2007 STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates versus DEVESH KUMAR SHARMA KEDAR NATH SATISH KUMAR MUKESH KUMAR LALIT SHARMA RAMESH LAL RAM KISHAN SHARMA VIJAY KUMAR SINGH SANJAY KUMAR RAM KUMAR RAM CHET .....Respondents + W.P. (C) 8739/2009 Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate RAM CHET & ORS. .....Petitioners W.P. (C) 7237/2007 & other connected matters Page 1 of 13 1. Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate versus STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Khushboo Kapur, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Imp...
Ankita vs.idbi Bank Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 10, 2018 W.P.(C) 3512/2018 & CMs 13847-48/2018 ANKITA Through: Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Mr. Waseem Khan and Mr. Amique Khalid, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus IDBI BANK LTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through: Mr. Sumit Nagpal, Advocate ..... Respondent ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner claims that in pursuance of Advertisement No.2/16-17 (Annexure P-1), petitioner had applied for the post of Assistant Manager, Grade-A and as per the result declared, she had scored 90 marks out of 200 marks in the written examination and 44 marks out of 100 marks in the interview, but the reason put forth by respondent-Bank for non- selection of petitioner is unsuccessful in interview. Learned counsel for petitioner has drawn attention of this Court to RTI reply of 22nd March, 2018, which reveals that the cut-off of final merit list for the post in question was 71.50 marks and petitioner had secured 134 marks.... Petitioner further...
Oriflame India Private Limited vs.additional Commissioner of Income Ta ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
$~5 to 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:10. 04.2018 + ITA8122017 ORIFLAME INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent + ITA8132017 ORIFLAME INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX..... Respondent + ITA8252017 ORIFLAME INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ..... Respondent Present: Mr.Himanshu Sinha and Mr. Bhuwan Dhoopar, Advocates for petitioner. Mr.Deepak Anand, Jr.Standing Counsel for Revenue. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT ITA8122017 & connected appeals Page 1 of 2 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The appeals are allowed.2. For reasons, the judgment dated 10.4.2018 in ITA8112017 may be referred to. APRIL10 2018 ndn S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J A. K. CHAWLA, J ITA8122017 & connected appeals Page 2 of 2...
Khalifa Chain Sukh vs.ajit Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2018
$~8 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"10th April, 2018 CM (M) 1236/2017 and CM No.42896/2017 KHALIFA CHAIN SUKH ..... Appellant AJIT SINGH Through: Mr. Ram Krishan Saini, Adv. Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mayank Wadhwa, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the orders dated 09.07.2012 of the Additional Rent Controller and dated 29.07.2017 of the Rent Control Tribunal on his prayer for an order to be passed under Section 15 (1) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, against the respondent in the context of his petition (E-16/11) seeking an order of eviction on the ground of non-payment of rent under Section 14 (1) (a) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 respecting shop No.7 (private) in premises No.3- A/112, Sat Nagar, W.E.A., Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005.2. The respondent does not dispute in the pleadings that he is a tenant in the said shop. The petitioner has brought the case for eviction on the ground that the res...