Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs.general Secretary, Bharitya Shramjivi S ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 11, 2018 (i) + W.P.(C) 22957/2005 INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Navet & Mr. Kushagra Pandit, Advocates Versus PETROLEUM WORKERS UNION Through: Mr. B.K. Singh, Advocate ..... Respondent (ii) + W.P.(C) 22992/2005 INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Navet & Mr. Kushagra Pandit, Advocates Versus GENERAL SECRETARY, BHARITYA SHRAMJIVI SANGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. B.K. Singh, Advocate (iii) + W.P.(C) 6915/2010 INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajat Navet & Mr. Kushagra Pandit, Advocates Versus GENERAL SECRETARY, BHARTIYA SHRAMJIVI SANGH Through: Mr. Sunil Dwivedi, Mr. Puneet Saini & Mr. Bimal Prakash, Advocates ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 22957/2005 W.P.(C) 22992/2005 W.P.(C) 6915/2010 Page 1 of 5 1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR (ORAL) JUDGMENT The challenge to the impugned Award of 19th September, 2005 in W.P.(C) 22957/...
Amrik Singh Khurana & Ors. Vs.sardar Joginder Singh Soni (Deceased) Th ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
$~12 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"11th April, 2018 R.C. REV. 656/2015 AMRIK SINGH KHURANA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Anil Hooda & Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advs. versus SARDAR JOGINDER SINGH SONI (DECEASED) THRU LRs. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Goswami, Mr. Rajiv Dewan & Mr. Angad Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioners are concededly the tenants in premises described as shop admeasuring 8 feet x 9 feet, side portion (facing West) forming part of property No.H-12A, Kalkaji, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the suit shop) under the respondent. Admittedly, the letting purpose is non-residential, the suit shop being used accordingly for running business in the name and style of Navrang Gift Shop. The respondent had filed an application in the Court of Rent Controller for eviction of the petitioners on the ground of bona fide need under Section 14 (1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. The said proceed...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.m/s Prithvi Associates
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
$~49 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:11. h April, 2018 FAO(OS) (COMM) 61/2018 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Bajaj, Mr. Soayib Qureshi and Mr. Naveen Advocates versus M/S PRITHVI ASSOCIATES Through: Nemo. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M.13915/2018 (delay) 1.2. This is an application seeking condonation of 38 days delay in filing the present appeal. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the present appeal is condoned.3. The application stands disposed of. C.M.13916/2018 (exemption) 4.5. Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. FAO(OS) (COMM) 61/2018 6. The present appeal has been filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act read with Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act for setting aside the impugned judgment dated 28.11.2017 passed by the L...
Manoj & Anr. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 822/2002 & CRL.M.A.2996/2003 Decided on:11. h April 2018 Reserved on:22. d March 2018 MANOJ & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Vikram Singh Panwar and Mr. Vikas Walia, Advocates. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State. With CRL.A. 836/2002 RAM NIWAS & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advocates for appellant no.1 Mr. Manoj Kumar Ohri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Varun Tyagi, Mr. Bharat Gupta, Mr. Nawab Singh Jaglan, Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Raj, Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Mr. Vishesh Chauhan and Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Advocates for Appellant Nos. 3 and 4. Versus + STATE OF NCT OF DELHI CRL.A Nos. 822/2002, 836/2002, 929/2002 & 937/2002 ..... Respondent Page 1 of 34 Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State. + CRL.A. 929/2002 With SURANJAN SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vikram Singh Panwar and Mr. Vikas Walia, Advocates. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ........
Sangeeta Kumari & Anr vs.shittal Parsad Nekie
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : APRIL11 2018 + CRL.REV.P. 368/2014 SANGEETA KUMARI & ANR ........ Petitioners Through : Mr.Rajesh Pandey, Advocate. versus SHITTAL PARSAD NEKIE ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Suparna Sinha, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioners to challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 26.03.2014 of learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Courts by which in the proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance @ `7,500/- p.m. was granted to petitioner No.2 only declining it to the petitioner No.1. The revision petition is contested by the respondent.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. The petitioners had filed proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C. against the respondent. The petitioner No.1 examined herself as PW-1 and respondent appeared as RW-1 in the said Crl.Rev.P.368/2014 Page 1 of...
Ritu Bajaj vs.delhi State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 11, 2018 W.P.(C) 3570/2018 & C.Ms. 14092-93/2018 RITU BAJAJ ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Senior Advocate with Mr.Sumit Rana, Ms. Manish Mehta & Ms. Mrigna Shekhar, Advocates Versus DELHI STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD. Through: Mr. Anil Bector & Mr. A.K. Jain, Advocates ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1.... Petitioner claims that she is officiating as Company Secretary in respondent-Corporation since May, 2015 and the post of Company Secretary advertised in July, 2017 is required to be filled up by promotion/deputation in the first instance and if no suitable candidate is found, then by direct recruitment. To submit so, reliance is placed upon respondents Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 1989.2. Learned senior counsel for petitioner has handed over a copy of RTI reply of July, 2017 of respondent obtained under The Right to Information Act, 2005, which reveals that ...
Dhannu Dabi vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Order: April 11, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3521/2018 & C.M. 13872/2018 1. DHANNU DABI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M. Rais Farooqui & Ms. Deep Shikha, Advocates Versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel for North DMC & Ms. Swagata Bhumna, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. Sujeet Kumar Mishra, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner is a Primary Teacher, who seeks a mandamus to respondent-Directorate of Education to take over the management of the School and to fill up the vacant posts of Principal and two teachers in respondent-School.... Petitioner claims to have made various Representations to first respondent to seek the relief as claimed in this petition.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that there is no response to petitioners Representation by first respondent. W.P.(C) 3521/2018 Page 1 of 2 3. In the fact...
Birender Sangwan vs.distt. Judge North West & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
$~33 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 486/2018 % Date of decision :11. h April, 2018 BIRENDER SANGWAN ........ Petitioner Through :... Petitioner (Adv.) in person with Ms. Kanika Sharma, Adv. versus DISTT. JUDGE NORTH WEST & ANR ...... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sanjay Dewan and Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advs. for R-1. Mr. T. Singhdev and Mr. Tarun Verma, Advs. for BCD. Mr. Praveen Nagar and Mr. Rakesh Chauhan, Advs. in person. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition complained of defacement of the walls of the court complexes by the contestants during the recently conducted elections to the Delhi Bar Council.2. Pursuant to the notices issued by this court, several candidates against whom the petitioner has made complaints have got removed W.P.(C)No.486/2018 Page 1 of 2 the offending material which was displayed/pasted by them in the court complexes. Moreover, these candi...
Shailesh @ Rinku vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:6. h April 2018 Decided on:11. h April 2018 + CRL.A. 1105/2013 SHAILESH @ RINKU STATE Through: Mr. Vikas Padora with Ms. Inderjeet Sindhu and Mr. Dipanshu Chugh, Advocates ...Appellant versus Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for... RESPONDENTCORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA State JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: Introduction 1. This appeal is directed against a judgment dated 20th May 2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Dwarka Courts in Sessions Case No.15/2013 arising out of FIR No.296/2011 registered at Police Station (PS) Dabri, convicting the Appellant for the offences under Sections 411/392/397/302/201 Indian Penal Code (IPC).2. This appeal is also directed against the order on sentence dated 28th May 2013 passed by the learned ASJ whereby: (i) For the offence under Section 302 IPC, the Appellant was sentenced Crl.A. 1105/2013 Page 1 of 21 to undergo imprisonment for life and pay a fi...
Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd. And Ors. Vs.monsanto Technology Llc and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:09. 03.2018 Pronounced on:11. 04.2018 FAO (OS) (COMM) 86/2017, C.M. APPL.14331, 14335, 15669, 17064/2017 NUZIVEEDU SEEDS LTD. AND ORS. Appellants Through: Sh. C.A. Sundaram, Sh. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Diya Kapur, Ms. Swathi Sukumar, Ms. Swati Setia, Sh. Essence Obhan, Ms. Himanie Katoch, Sh. Nikhil Ratti Kapoor, Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Ms. Pooja Katara, Ms. Charul Yadav, Sh. Abhishek Saket, Ms. Vijaya Singh, Sh. Jatin and Ms. Rohini Musa, Advocates. Versus MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC AND ORS. ..Respondents Through: Sh. Sandeep Sethi, Ms. Prathiba. M. Singh, Sh. C.M. Lall, Sr. Advocates with Ms. Bitika Sharma, Sh. Kapil Midha, Ms. Namrita Kochhar, Ms. Deepshika Malhotra, Sh. Adarsh Ramanujam, Sh. Anil Dutt, Sh. Shantanu Agarwal, Sh. Rishi Agarwala, Ms. Anusuya Nigam, Sh. Lakshay Kaushik and Ms. Ruchika Wadhawan, Advocates. Sh. Sunil Mathews, Advocate, for UOI. Sh. Neel Mason and Ms. Ridhima, Advocates, for Amar Biotech Ltd. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- Next ›
- Last »