Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Attire Deisigners Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Known as M/S Sidh Designers ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.5082/2017 Date of decision:12. h April, 2018 M/S WELLDONE EXIM PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S G.D. MANGALAM EXIM PVT. LTD.) ........ Petitioner Through Mr. G.K. Sarkar, Ms. Malabika Sarkar, Mr. Prashant Srivastava and Mr. Deepak Mahajan, Advocates. versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE & ANR...Respondent Through Mr. Amit Mahajan, Advocate for DGFT. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel for Customs. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.5091/2017 M/S ATTIRE DEISIGNERS PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S ........ Petitioner SIDH DESIGNERS PVT. LTD.) Through Mr. G.K. Sarkar, Ms. Malabika Sarkar, Mr. Prashant Srivastava and Mr. Deepak Mahajan, Advocates. versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE & ANR...Respondent Through Mr. Amit Mahajan, Advocate for DGFT. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel for Customs. W.P. (C) Nos. 5082/2017, 5091/2017 & 5093/2017 Page 1 of 14 M/S GOODONE TRADERS PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S ...
Praduman Patel vs.government of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:12. h April, 2018 + W.P.(C) 10283/2015 PRADUMAN PATEL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Vishal Maan, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr.Kushal Raj Tater, Advocates for respondent / L&B/ LAC/ GNCTD. Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Ms.Komal Ms.Mrinalini Sharma, Advocates for respondent/DDA. Sorout and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings in respect of the land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra No.1428 min (1-4) total admeasuring 01 bigha 4 biswas situated in the revenue estate of village Malikpur Kohi @ Rangpuri, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) stands lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of ...
Kaptan Singh vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-12-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:12. h April, 2018 $~28 * % + W.P.(C) 3476/2015 KAPTAN SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Gupta and Mr. Harpreet Singh, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Mr. Sidharth Rathore, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Ms. Komal Sorout and Ms. Mrinalini Sharma, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is fully covered by the decision rendered in the case of N.K.Bakshi & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors., W.P.(C) 8989/2014. It is stated that the acquisition made through the notification published on 26.04.2013 is contrary to The Lan...
Exide Life Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.mitun Garg
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h April, 2018. CS(OS) 15/2016, OA No.69/2017 & IA No.240/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) EXIDE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Siddharth Agarwal, Mr. Adit S. Pujari, Mr. Faraz Maqbool, Ms. Surabhi Dhar and Mr. Rohan Kothari, Advs. Versus MITUN GARG Through: In person. ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff instituted this suit against the now sole defendant Mitun Garg as well as against one Ms. Sana Khan for (i) recovery, jointly and severally, of compensation in the sum of Rs.2,50,00,000/- for the loss sustained by the plaintiff on account of loss of reputation caused by defamatory statements and malicious falsehoods published by the defendants; (ii) permanent injunction restraining the defendants from publishing, communicating and circulating statements which are defamatory of the plaintiff, alleging that the plaintiff aided and abetted the alleged accused and ...
Monsanto Technology Llc and Ors. Vs.nuziveedu Seeds Ltd. And Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:09. 03.2018 Pronounced on:11. 04.2018 FAO (OS) (COMM) 76/2017, CAV. 328/2017, C.M. APPL.13348- 13352/2017 MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC AND ORS. ..Appellants Through: Sh. Sandeep Sethi, Ms. Prathiba. M. Singh, Sh. C.M. Lall, Sr. Advocates with Ms. Bitika Sharma, Sh. Kapil Midha, Ms. Namrita Kochhar, Ms. Deepshika Malhotra, Sh. Adarsh Ramanujam, Sh. Anil Dutt, Sh. Shantanu Agarwal, Sh. Rishi Agarwala, Ms. Anusuya Nigam, Sh. Lakshay Kaushik and Ms. Ruchika Wadhawan, Advocates. NUZIVEEDU SEEDS LTD. AND ORS. Respondents Through: Sh. C.A. Sundaram, Sh. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Diya Kapur, Ms. Swathi Sukumar, Ms. Swati Setia, Sh. Essence Obhan, Ms. Himanie Katoch, Sh. Nikhil Ratti Kapoor, Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Ms. Pooja Katara, Ms. Charul Yadav, Sh. Abhishek Saket, Ms. Vijaya Singh, Sh. Jatin and Ms. Rohini Musa, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % ...
Pratyush Anand Mishra and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 11, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3553/2018 & C.M. 14026/2018 1. PRATYUSH ANAND MISHRA AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Kabir Dixit, Mr. Krishnan Mishra & Mr. Shashank Singh, Advocates Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Atul Shanker Mathur, Ms. Priya Singh, Ms. Sweta Singh & Ms. Deepabali Datra, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Advertisement No.02/2018 (Annexure P-1) for the post of Law Officer (E1Grade) recruitment through CLAT, 2018 (PG Exam Scores) requires that a candidate should have a Bachelors Degree in Law (BL or LL.B.) from Colleges approved by Bar Council of India and one years post-qualification experience as an Executive/Officer in the Legal set up of the Government / Semi Government/ Public Sector Undertaking/ Nationalised Banks/ Listed Companies on NSE/BSE.2. The grievance of petitioners in this petition is that the experience qualificati...
Hari Singh Dulgas vs.the Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 11, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3563/2018 & C.M. 14043-44/2018 1. HARI SINGH DULGAS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Dalal & Ms. Garima Goel, Advocates Versus THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur & Mr. Himanshu Joshi, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR... Petitioner is facing a departmental inquiry and vide e-mail of 14th ORDER (ORAL) March, 2018, petitioner had requested the Inquiry Officer to appoint Mr. Pratap Singh or Mr. Sunil Kumar Ranga, retired officers of respondent- Insurance Company as Defence Assistant. As per E-Mails of 14th March, 2018 and 15th March, 2018 (Annexure P-14 colly), the Inquiry Officer has turned down petitioners request for appointment of an ex employee as Defence Assistant by referring to Conduct, Discipline and Appeal (CDA) Rules , which permit only the existing employee of respondent-Company to act as a Defence Assistant.2. Learned counsel for...
Vinay Kaushik vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:11th April, 2018 + W.P.(C) 1837/2016 and CM No.7894/2016 VINAY KAUSHIK ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Soumyajit Pani and Mr. Chittaranjan Singh, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Prateek Dhanda and Mr. Waize Ali Noor Advs. for R-1&2. Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Adv. for R-4 Mr. Arunav Patnaik and Mr. Karun Pahwa, Advs. for R-5 CORAM:-"HONBLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT (ORAL) C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. After hearing arguments on behalf of both sides, we had, on 11th April, 2018, dismissed the present writ petition, stating that the reasons for our decision would follow. This judgement proceeds to record the said reasons. W.P.(C) 1837/2016 Page 1 of 15 2. The petitioner, who is a student pursuing his Vidyavaridhi (Ph.D.) with the Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri Rashtriya Sanskrit Vidyapeetha (Respondent No 4 herein, and referred to, h...
Snehlata (Through Legal Heirs) Sai Chanakya Maverick vs.priti Tandon & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h April, 2018 Counter Claim No.12/2014 SNEHLATA (THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS) SAI CHANAKYA MAVERICK .... Counter-claimant Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav and Mr. Wasim Ashraf, Advs. Versus PRITI TANDON & ANR. ...Defendants Through: Mr. Arvind K. Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhimanyu Walia, Mr. Nikhil Sharda and Mr. Mehtaab Singh Sandhu, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 Application of the defendants, being IA No.12861/2016 under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), for rejection of the Counter Claim is for adjudication.2. This Counter Claim, inter alia for partition of property no.B-9, West End Colony, New Delhi 110 021, was filed in CS(OS) No.1352/2012 filed for partition of property no.C-31, West End Colony, New Delhi 110 021.3. Vide order dated 5th December, 2013 on application under Order XII Rule 6 of the CPC of the defendants herein (who were plaintiffs in the suit), a preliminary d...
Sandisk Llc vs.ishu Narang
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-2018
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 857/2016 SANDISK LLC Through Mr.Prithvi Singh with Mr.Utkarsh ..... Plaintiff Joshi, Advocates. versus ISHU NARANG Through None .....Defendant Date of Decision:11. h April, 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) I.A. 4478/2018 1. Present application has been filed under Order XIII-A, Rule 2 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for summary judgment.2. It is pertinent to mention that the present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade dress, copyright, passing off; rendition of account of profits, damages and delivery up. The prayer clause in the present suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-"CS(COMM) 857/2016 Page 1 of 6 26. It is, therefore, prayed that the following reliefs may be granted to the Plaintiffs: a) indirectly dealing An order for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their partners, proprietors, servants, agents and all...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »